Show simple item record

Finding Correlations Among Successful Reintroductions: An Analysis and Review of Current and Past Mistakes

dc.contributor.authorEstrada, Jillian
dc.contributor.advisorLow, Bobbi
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-23T14:13:56Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2014-04-23T14:13:56Z
dc.date.issued2014-04
dc.date.submitted2014-04
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106549
dc.description.abstractIn the past half century the world has seen a dramatic decline in species. More and more species are being pushed to brink of extinction. In the past, there have been several methods utilized to mitigate these trends, however with the recent surge of local extinctions, reintroductions have become a growing conservation tool. Despite many disadvantages of developing a reintroduction plan, hundreds have been attempted over the past 40 years, with mixed outcomes. Some conservationists have studied the factors associated with success; however the criteria on which their assessments were based were flawed. I attempted to complete my own assessment of successful programs using detailed program information along with life history traits of focal species. My results illustrate the many obstacles faced by reintroduction biologists. Based on the limitations faced throughout this study, I conclude that conservationists must take a step back and address the many issues with current reintroduction protocols prior to attempting any further assessments. My recommended solutions to some of these issues include defining universal criteria for a reintroduction program to be considered successful; monitoring, logging, and disseminating standardized data; and collaborating with captive facilities that have the ability to offer additional support.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectReintroductionen_US
dc.subjectSuccessen_US
dc.subjectConservationen_US
dc.subjectEndangereden_US
dc.titleFinding Correlations Among Successful Reintroductions: An Analysis and Review of Current and Past Mistakesen_US
dc.typePracticumen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenameMaster of Science (MS)en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberMcPhee, M. Elsbeth
dc.identifier.uniqnamejestradaen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106549/1/Estrada_Practicum_2014.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.