Show simple item record

The Spatial Distribution of Benefits Resulting from REDD+ and FSC Implementation in Southeastern Tanzania

dc.contributor.authorCornwall, Meghan
dc.contributor.authorO'Gara, Katie
dc.contributor.authorSchaap, Brian
dc.contributor.authorVayo II, Louis
dc.contributor.authorAzeez, Karen
dc.contributor.advisorAgrawal, Arun
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-24T18:35:31Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2014-04-24T18:35:31Z
dc.date.issued2014-04
dc.date.submitted2014-04
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106561
dc.description.abstractForest loss and land use changes associated with agricultural expansion, urban development and bioenergy production are key concerns for many governments and forest-dependent communities around the world. Several strategies exist to address forest loss, including market-based mechanisms that promote good forest governance such as the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation program that includes enhancements in biodiversity and livelihoods (REDD+) and the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification. Many positive outcomes result from forest governance programs like REDD+ and FSC, including payments, increased stakeholder participation, and dissemination of knowledge among forest dependent communities. However, the distribution of and satisfaction with these outcomes is highly contextualized and variable at the community level. The objective of this paper is to analyze and understand the ways in which REDD+ and FSC program design and implementation impact the distribution of, and satisfaction with, program benefits at the community level. Specifically, this paper analyzes three study sites in Southeastern Tanzania implementing these programs. Our study finds that forest conservation programs have the opportunity to either exacerbate or ameliorate underlying disparity caused by spatial asymmetry in rural communities in Southeastern Tanzania. Different benefit-sharing and implementation mechanisms are shown to exhibit varying levels of success in overcoming baseline inequalities, and appear to be more important in determining community level benefits, participation, and knowledge sharing than inherent programmatic differences between REDD+ and FSC.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectREDD+en_US
dc.subjectFSCen_US
dc.subjectTanzaniaen_US
dc.subjectCommunity Forestryen_US
dc.titleThe Spatial Distribution of Benefits Resulting from REDD+ and FSC Implementation in Southeastern Tanzaniaen_US
dc.typeProjecten_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenameMaster of Science (MS)en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberna, na
dc.identifier.uniqnamemacornwaen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnamekogaraen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnamebschaapen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnamelvayoen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnamekazeezen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106561/1/Spatial Distribution of Benefits - REDD+ and FSC in Tanzania.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.