Show simple item record

Dynamic MRI evaluation of urethral hypermobility post‐radical prostatectomy

dc.contributor.authorSuskind, Anne M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDeLancey, John O.L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHussain, Hero K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMontgomery, Jeffrey S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLatini, Jerilyn M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCameron, Anne P.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-21T18:03:27Z
dc.date.available2015-06-01T15:48:45Zen_US
dc.date.issued2014-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationSuskind, Anne M.; DeLancey, John O.L.; Hussain, Hero K.; Montgomery, Jeffrey S.; Latini, Jerilyn M.; Cameron, Anne P. (2014). "Dynamic MRI evaluation of urethral hypermobility post‐radical prostatectomy." Neurourology and Urodynamics 33(3): 312-315.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0733-2467en_US
dc.identifier.issn1520-6777en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106760
dc.description.abstractAims One postulated cause of post‐prostatectomy incontinence is urethral and bladder neck hypermobility. The objective of this study was to determine the magnitude of anatomical differences of urethral and bladder neck position at rest and with valsalva in continent and incontinent men post‐prostatectomy based on dynamic MRI. Methods All subjects underwent a dynamic MRI protocol with valsalva and non‐valsalva images and a standard urodynamic evaluation. MRI measurements were taken at rest and with valsalva, including (1) bladder neck to sacrococcygeal inferior pubic point line (SCIPP), (2) urethra to pubis, and (3) bulbar urethra to SCIPP. Data were analyzed in SAS using two‐tailed t tests. Results A total of 21 subjects (13 incontinent and 8 continent) had complete data and were included in the final analysis. The two groups had similar demographic characteristics. On MRI, there were no statistically significant differences in anatomic position of the bladder neck or urethra either at rest or with valsalva. The amount of hypermobility ranged from 0.8 to 2 mm in all measures. There were also no differences in the amount of hypermobility (position at rest minus position at valsalva) between groups. Conclusions We found no statistically significant differences in bladder neck and urethral position or mobility on dynamic MRI evaluation between continent and incontinent men status post‐radical prostatectomy. A more complex mechanism for post‐prostatectomy incontinence needs to be modeled in order to better understand the continence mechanism in this select group of men. Neurourol. Urodynam. 33:312–315, 2014 . © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherMale Incontinenceen_US
dc.subject.otherMRIen_US
dc.subject.otherProstatctomyen_US
dc.subject.otherUrethral Hypermobilityen_US
dc.titleDynamic MRI evaluation of urethral hypermobility post‐radical prostatectomyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106760/1/nau22408.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nau.22408en_US
dc.identifier.sourceNeurourology and Urodynamicsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSummers A, Winkel LA, Hussain HK, et al. The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 2006; 194: 1438 – 43. Epub 2006/04/04.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA: A Cancer J Clinic 2010; 60: 277 – 300. Epub 2010/07/09.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarlan LC, Potosky A, Gilliland FD, et al. Factors associated with initial therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: Prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93: 1864 – 71. Epub 2001/12/26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThompson I, Thrasher JB, Aus G, et al. Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update. J Urol 2007; 177: 2106 – 31. Epub 2007/05/19.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatz G, Rodriguez R. Changes in continence and health‐related quality of life after curative treatment and watchful waiting of prostate cancer. Urology 2007; 69: 1157 – 60. Epub 2007/06/19.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKordan Y, Alkibay T, Sozen S, et al. Is there an impact of postoperative urethral and periurethral anatomical features in post‐radical retropubic prostatectomy incontinence ? Urol Int 2007; 78: 208 – 13. Epub 2007/04/05.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNarayan P, Konety B, Aslam K, et al. Neuroanatomy of the external urethral sphincter: Implications for urinary continence preservation during radical prostate surgery. J Urol 1995; 153: 337 – 41. Epub 1995/02/01.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoraitim MM. The male urethral sphincter complex revisited: An anatomical concept and its physiological correlate. J Urol 2008; 179: 1683 – 9. Epub 2008/03/18.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStolzenburg JU, Schwalenberg T, Horn LC, et al. Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatecomy. European urology 2007; 51: 629 – 39. Epub 2006/12/02.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMyers RP, Cahill DR, Devine RM, et al. Anatomy of radical prostatectomy as defined by magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 1998; 159: 2148 – 58. Epub 1998/05/23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrooks JD, Chao WM, Kerr J. Male pelvic anatomy reconstructed from the visible human data set. J Urol 1998; 159: 868 – 72. Epub 1998/02/25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNoguchi M, Shimada A, Nakashima O., et al. Urodynamic evaluation of a suspension technique for rapid recovery of continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int J Urol 2006; 13: 373 – 8. Epub 2006/06/01.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRehder P, Gozzi C. Transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence including post‐radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007; 52: 860 – 6. Epub 2007/02/24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardisation sub‐committee of the International Continence Society. Urology 2003; 61: 37 – 49. Epub 2003/02/01.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUmek WH, Kearney R, Morgan DM, et al. The axial location of structural regions in the urethra: A magnetic resonance study in nulliparous women. Obstetr Gynecol 2003; 102: 1039 – 45. Epub 2003/12/16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllen SD, Thompson A, Sohaib SA. The normal post‐surgical anatomy of the male pelvis following radical prostatectomy as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 1281 – 91. Epub 2008/02/14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerger MB, Doumouchtsis SK, Delancey JO. Bony pelvis dimensions in women with and without stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2012; 32: 37 – 42. Epub 2012/06/08.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNardos R, Thurmond AS, Worstell TR, et al. Reference lines in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic floor. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2010; 16: 242 – 5. Epub 2010/07/01.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaw YM, Fielding JR. MRI of pelvic floor dysfunction: Review. Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: S45 – 53. Epub 2008/12/05.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYang A, Mostwin JL, Rosenshein NB, et al. Pelvic floor descent in women: Dynamic evaluation with fast MR imaging and cinematic display. Radiology 1991; 179: 25 – 33. Epub 1991/04/01.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeLancey JO. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: The hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 1994; 170: 1713 – 20 discussion 20–3. Epub 1994/06/01.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoljanik I, Bauer RM, Becker AJ., et al. Morphology and dynamics of the male pelvic floor before and after retrourethral transobturator sling placement: First insight using MRI. World J Urol 2012. Epub 2012/06/20.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.