A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of the sandwich bone augmentation technique in increasing buccal bone thickness during implant placement surgery
dc.contributor.author | Fu, Jia‐hui | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Oh, Tae‐ju | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Benavides, Erika | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Rudek, Ivan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Hom‐lay | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-21T18:03:29Z | |
dc.date.available | WITHHELD_13_MONTHS | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2014-05-21T18:03:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-04 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Fu, Jia‐hui ; Oh, Tae‐ju ; Benavides, Erika; Rudek, Ivan; Wang, Hom‐lay (2014). "A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of the sandwich bone augmentation technique in increasing buccal bone thickness during implant placement surgery." Clinical Oral Implants Research 25(4): 458-467. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0905-7161 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1600-0501 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106765 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives Sandwich bone augmentation ( SBA ) has been proposed to augment the width of edentulous ridges for implant placement. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a membrane on SBA for the regeneration of buccal implant dehiscence defects. Material and methods Twenty‐six healthy patients, each with a single defect, were randomly assigned into two groups. Both groups received an inner and outer layer of mineralized human cancellous and cortical particulate allograft. In the test group, a bovine pericardium membrane covered the bone grafts, while no membrane was placed in the control group. Cone beam computed tomography ( CBCT ) scans were taken before and immediately after implant placement and at 6 months post‐surgery. Results All implants placed were successfully osseointegrated at 6 months. Clinical re‐entry measurements showed significant buccal bone gain in the test group compared with the control group ( P < 0.05). The test group had 1.12, 2.21 and 2.44 mm more buccal bone thickness at 2, 4 and 6 mm below the bone crest. There were no significant differences in the mid‐buccal vertical bone height, defect height and width reductions and bone fill between the two groups ( P > 0.05). Cone beam computed tomography analysis demonstrated significant buccal bone gain of 1.22 mm in the test group. Radiographic vertical bone loss at 1‐year post‐surgery showed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusion Sandwich bone augmentation is a predictable technique for regenerating buccal bone on implant dehiscence defects. Addition of a barrier membrane prevented significant horizontal buccal bone resorption as space was maintained more effectively when compared with sites treated without a membrane. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Dental Implants | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Cone Beam Computed Tomography | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Bone Regeneration | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Bone Grafts | en_US |
dc.title | A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of the sandwich bone augmentation technique in increasing buccal bone thickness during implant placement surgery | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Dentistry | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106765/1/clr12171.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/clr.12171 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Clinical Oral Implants Research | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Park, S.H. & Wang, H.L. ( 2006 ) Management of localized buccal dehiscence defect with allografts and acellular dermal matrix. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 26: 589 – 595. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Jensen, S.S. & Terheyden, H. ( 2009 ) Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: clinical results with different bone grafts and bone‐substitute materials. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 24 ( Suppl. ): 218 – 236. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Junker, R., Dimakis, A., Thoneick, M. & Jansen, J.A. ( 2009 ) Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research 20 ( Suppl. 4 ): 185 – 206. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lee, A., Brown, D. & Wang, H.L. ( 2009 ) Sandwich bone augmentation for predictable horizontal bone augmentation. Implant Dentistry 18: 282 – 290. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Loe, H. ( 1967 ) The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. Journal of Periodontology 38 ( Suppl. ): 610 – 616. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nevins, M., Mellonig, J.T., Clem, D.S., 3rd, Reiser, G.M. & Buser, D.A. ( 1998 ) Implants in regenerated bone: long‐term survival. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 18: 34 – 45. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Oh, T.J., Meraw, S.J., Lee, E.J., Giannobile, W.V. & Wang, H.L. ( 2003 ) Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects. Clinical Oral Implants Research 14: 80 – 90. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Oh, T.J., Yoon, J., Misch, C.E. & Wang, H.L. ( 2002 ) The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science? Journal of Periodontology 73: 322 – 333. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | O'Leary, T.J., Drake, R.B. & Naylor, J.E. ( 1972 ) The plaque control record. Journal of Periodontology 43: 38. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Park, S.H., Lee, K.W., Oh, T.J., Misch, C.E., Shotwell, J. & Wang, H.L. ( 2008 ) Effect of absorbable membranes on sandwich bone augmentation. Clinical Oral Implants Research 19: 32 – 41. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Park, S.H. & Wang, H.L. ( 2007 ) Clinical significance of incision location on guided bone regeneration: human study. Journal of Periodontology 78: 47 – 51. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Razavi, T., Palmer, R.M., Davies, J., Wilson, R. & Palmer, P.J. ( 2010 ) Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography. Clinical Oral Implants Research 21: 718 – 725. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shiratori, L.N., Marotti, J., Yamanouchi, J., Chilvarquer, I., Contin, I. & Tortamano‐Neto, P. ( 2012 ) Measurement of buccal bone volume of dental implants by means of cone‐beam computed tomography. Clinical Oral Implants Research 23: 797 – 804. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shotwell, J.L., Billy, E.J., Wang, H.L. & Oh, T.J. ( 2005 ) Implant surgical guide fabrication for partially edentulous patients. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 93: 294 – 297. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Skoglund, A., Hising, P. & Young, C. ( 1997 ) A clinical and histologic examination in humans of the osseous response to implanted natural bone mineral. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 12: 194 – 199. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Szmukler‐Moncler, S., Salama, H., Reingewirtz, Y. & Dubruille, J.H. ( 1998 ) Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone‐dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 43: 192 – 203. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Tyndall, D.A. & Brooks, S.L. ( 2000 ) Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the american academy of oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 89: 630 – 637. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wang, H.L., Misch, C. & Neiva, R.F. ( 2004 ) “Sandwich” Bone augmentation technique: rationale and report of pilot cases. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 24: 232 – 245. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wennerberg, A. & Albrektsson, T. ( 2009 ) Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research 20 ( Suppl. 4 ): 172 – 184. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zambon, R., Mardas, N., Horvath, A., Petrie, A., Dard, M. & Donos, N. ( 2012 ) The effect of loading in regenerated bone in dehiscence defects following a combined approach of bone grafting and gbr. Clinical Oral Implants Research 23: 591 – 601. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zitzmann, N.U., Naef, R. & Scharer, P. ( 1997 ) Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with bio‐oss for guided bone regeneration. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 12: 844 – 852. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zitzmann, N.U., Scharer, P., Marinello, C.P., Schupbach, P. & Berglundh, T. ( 2001 ) Alveolar ridge augmentation with bio‐oss: a histologic study in humans. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 21: 288 – 295. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Adell, R., Lekholm, U., Rockler, B. & Branemark, P.I. ( 1981 ) A 15‐year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. International Journal of Oral Surgery 10: 387 – 416. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Adell, R., Lekholm, U., Rockler, B., Branemark, P.I., Lindhe, J., Eriksson, B. & Sbordone, L. ( 1986 ) Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures (i). A 3‐year longitudinal prospective study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 15: 39 – 52. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Aghaloo, T.L. & Moy, P.K. ( 2007 ) Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 22 ( Suppl. ): 49 – 70. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bashutski, J.D. & Wang, H.L. ( 2007 ) Common implant esthetic complications. Implant Dentistry 16: 340 – 348. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Benic, G.I., Jung, R.E., Siegenthaler, D.W. & Hammerle, C.H. ( 2009 ) Clinical and radiographic comparison of implants in regenerated or native bone: 5‐year results. Clinical Oral Implants Research 20: 507 – 513. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Burchardt, H. ( 1983 ) The biology of bone graft repair. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 174: 28 – 42. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Buser, D., Dula, K., Belser, U.C., Hirt, H.P. & Berthold, H. ( 1995 ) Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. Ii. Surgical procedure in the mandible. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 15: 10 – 29. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Buser, D., Dula, K., Hirt, H.P. & Schenk, R.K. ( 1996 ) Lateral ridge augmentation using autografts and barrier membranes: a clinical study with 40 partially edentulous patients. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 54: 420 – 432; discussion 432–423. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Buser, D., Martin, W. & Belser, U.C. ( 2004 ) Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 19 ( Suppl. ): 43 – 61. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Buser, D., Weber, H.P. & Lang, N.P. ( 1990 ) Tissue integration of non‐submerged implants. 1‐year results of a prospective study with 100 iti hollow‐cylinder and hollow‐screw implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 1: 33 – 40. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cooper, L.F., Masuda, T., Yliheikkila, P.K. & Felton, D.A. ( 1998 ) Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part ii. In vitro studies. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 13: 163 – 174. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Davies, J.E. ( 2003 ) Understanding peri‐implant endosseous healing. Journal of Dental Education 67: 932 – 949. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Degidi, M., Perrotti, V., Shibli, J.A., Novaes, A.B., Piattelli, A. & Iezzi, G. ( 2011 ) Equicrestal and subcrestal dental implants: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of nine retrieved human implants. Journal of Periodontology 82: 708 – 715. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fienitz, T., Schwarz, F., Ritter, L., Dreiseidler, T., Becker, J. & Rothamel, D. ( 2012 ) Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri‐implant bone defect regeneration: a histologically controlled study in dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Research 23: 882 – 887. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Frost, H.M. ( 1983 ) The regional acceleratory phenomenon: a review. Henry Ford Hospital Medical Journal 31: 3 – 9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fu, J.H., Hsu, Y.T. & Wang, H.L. ( 2012 ) Identifying occlusal overload and how to deal with it to avoid marginal bone loss around implants. European Journal of Oral Implantology 5 ( Suppl. ): S91 – S103. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fugazzotto, P.A. ( 2005 ) Success and failure rates of osseointegrated implants in function in regenerated bone for 72 to 133 months. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 20: 77 – 83. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Guerra, I., Morais Branco, F., Vasconcelos, M., Afonso, A., Figueiral, H. & Zita, R. ( 2011 ) Evaluation of implant osseointegration with different regeneration techniques in the treatment of bone defects around implants: an experimental study in a rabbit model. Clinical Oral Implants Research 22: 314 – 322. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hammerle, C.H., Jung, R.E. & Feloutzis, A. ( 2002 ) A systematic review of the survival of implants in bone sites augmented with barrier membranes (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous patients. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 29 ( Suppl. 3 ): 226 – 231; discussion 232–223. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Jemt, T., Lekholm, U. & Grondahl, K. ( 1990 ) 3‐year followup study of early single implant restorations ad modum branemark. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 10: 340 – 349. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.