Sacred values in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: resistance to social influence, temporal discounting, and exit strategies
dc.contributor.author | Sheikh, Hammad | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ginges, Jeremy | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Atran, Scott | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-23T15:58:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-11-03T16:20:37Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2013-09 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Sheikh, Hammad; Ginges, Jeremy; Atran, Scott (2013). "Sacred values in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: resistance to social influence, temporal discounting, and exit strategies." Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1299(1): 11-24. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106804> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0077-8923 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1749-6632 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106804 | |
dc.publisher | White House | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Palestinians | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Devoted Actors | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Intergroup Conflict | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Protected Values | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Sacred Values | en_US |
dc.title | Sacred values in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: resistance to social influence, temporal discounting, and exit strategies | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Science (General) | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106804/1/nyas12275.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/nyas.12275 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Skitka, L.J. 2010. The psychology of moral conviction. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 4: 267 – 281. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Johnson, D. 2005. God's punishment and public goods: a test of the supernatural punishment hypothesis in 186 world cultures. Hum. Nat. 16: 410 – 446. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fischer, R., R. Callander, P. Reddish & J. Bulbulia. 2013. How do rituals affect cooperation? An experimental field study comparing ritual types. Hum. Nat. 24: 115 – 125. doi 10.1007/s12110‐013‐9167‐y. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Paglieri, F., A. Borghi, L. Colzato, et al. 2013. Heaven can wait. How religion modulates temporal discounting. Psychol. Res. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Van Bavel, J.J., D.J. Packer, I.J. Haas, & W.A. Cunningham. 2012. The importance of moral construal: moral versus non‐moral construal elicits faster, more extreme, universal evaluations of the same actions. PloS one, 7 ( 11 ): e48693. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Durkheim, E. 1995 (1912). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Eliade, M. 1957. The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rappaport, R.A. 1971. The sacred in human evolution. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2: 23 – 44. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sheikh, H., J. Ginges, A. Coman & S. Atran. 2012. Religion, group threat and sacred values. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 7: 110 – 118. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Asch, S.E. 1956. Studies of independence and conformity. I: a minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychol. Monogr. 70: 1 – 70. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cialdini, R.B. & N. J. Goldstein. 2004. Social influence: compliance and conformity. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 55: 591 – 621. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Moscovici, S. 1985. Social influence and conformity. Handbook Soc. Psychol. 2: 347 – 412. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Malhotra, D. & J. Ginges. 2010. Preferring balanced vs. advantageous peace agreements: a study of Israeli attitudes towards a two state solution. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 5: 420 – 427. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cota, A.A., C.R. Evans, K.L. Dion, et al. 1995. The structure of group cohesion. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 21: 572 – 580. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Swann, W.B., J. Jetten, Á. Gómez, et al. 2012. When group membership gets personal: a theory of identity fusion. Psychol. Rev. 119: 441 – 456. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fiedler, K. 2007. Construal level theory as an integrative framework for behavioral decision‐making research and consumer psychology. J. Consum. Psychol. 17: 101 – 106. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Trope, Y. & N. Liberman. 2010. Construal‐level theory of psychological distance. Psychol. Rev. 117: 440 – 463. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Trope, Y. & N. Liberman. 2010. Construal‐level theory of psychological distance. Psychol. Rev. 117: 440 – 463. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ginges, J. & S. Atran. 2008. Humiliation and the inertia effect: implications for understanding violence and compromise in intractable intergroup conflicts. J. Cogn. Cult. 8: 3 – 4. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Atran, S. & R. Axelrod. 2008. Reframing sacred values. Negotiation J. 24: 221 – 246. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Collier, P., A. Hoeffler & D. Rohner. 2009. Beyond greed and grievance: feasibility and civil war. Oxford Econ. Pap. 61: 1 – 27. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fearon, J. D. & D.D. Laitin. 2003. Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 97: 75 – 90. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ross, M.L. 2004. What do we know about natural resources and civil war? J. Peace Res. 41: 337 – 356. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fearon, J.D. 2004. Why do some civil wars last so much longer than others? J. Peace Res. 41: 275 – 301. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Meirowitz, A. & A.E. Sartori. 2008. Strategic uncertainty as a cause of war. Quart. J. Polit. Sci. 3: 327 – 352. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Tetlock, P.E., O.V. Kristel, S.B. Elson, et al. 2000. The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade‐offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 78: 853. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Atran, S. 2006a. “ Devoted Actor” versus “Rational Actor” Models for Understanding World Conflict, Briefing to the National Security Council, White House, Washington, DC, September 14; available at http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/atran06/atran06_index.html | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nyhamar, T. 1997. Rationality explanations: the case of Kissinger's decision to supply arms to Angola. Coop. Confl. 32: 181 – 205. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Martin, L. 1999. The contributions of rational choice: a defense of pluralism. Int. Secur. 24: 74 – 83. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Atran, S. & J. Ginges. 2012. Religious and sacred imperatives in human conflict. Science 336: 855 – 857. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ginges, J., S. Atran, D. Medin & K. Shikaki. 2007. Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflict. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104: 7357 – 7360. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ginges, J., S. Atran, S. Sachdeva & D. Medin. 2011. Psychology out of the laboratory: the challenge of violent extremism. Am. Psychol. 66: 507. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ginges, J. & S. Atran. 2013. “ Sacred values and cultural conflict.” In Advances in Culture and Psychology. M.J Gelfand, C.Y Chiu & Y.Y Hong, Eds.: vol. 4. New York: Oxford University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ginges, J. & S. Atran. 2011. War as a moral imperative (not just practical politics by other means). Proc. R. Soc. B 278: 2930 – 2938. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Becker, G. 1962. Irrational behavior and economic theory. J. Polit. Econ. 70: 1 – 13. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Simon, H. 1982. Models of Bounded Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar Giroux & Strauss. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Jervis, R. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Allison, G. & P. Zelikow. 1999. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, 2nd ed. New York: Longman. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ginges, J. & S. Atran. 2009b. What motivates participation in violent political action. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1167: 115 – 123. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Atran, S. 2010. Talking to the Enemy: Violent Extremism, Sacred Values, and What it Means to be Human. London: Penguin. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sachdeva, S. & D.L. Medin. 2008. “ Is it more wrong to care less: the effects of more and less on the quantity sensitivity of protected values.” In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2008. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ginges, J. & S. Atran. 2009a. “ Non‐instrumental reasoning over sacred values: an Indonesian field experiment.” In Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 50: Moral Judgment and Decision Making. D. M. Bartels, C. W. Bauman, L. J. Skitka & D. L. Medin, Eds.: 194 – 206. San Diego: Academic Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Baron, J. & M. Spranca. 1997. Protected values. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes 70: 1 – 16. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Tetlock, P.E. 2003. Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7: 320 – 324. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Atran, S., R. Axelrod & R. Davis. 2007. Sacred barriers to conflict resolution. Science 317: 1039 – 1040. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dehghani, M., R. Iliev, S. Atran, et al. 2009. Emerging sacred values: the Iranian nuclear program. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 4: 990 – 993. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dehghani, M., S. Atran, R. Iliev, et al. 2010. Sacred values and conflict over Iran's nuclear program. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 5: 540 – 546. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sachdeva, S. & D.L. Medin. 2009. Group identity salience in sacred value based cultural conflict: an examination of the Hindu–Muslim identities in the Kashmir and Babri mosque issues. In: Proceedings of the 31th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2009. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Skitka, L.J. 2002. Do the means always justify the ends, or do the ends sometimes justify the means? A value protection model of justice reasoning. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 28: 588 – 597. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hoffman, B. & G. McCormick. 2004. Terrorism, signaling, and suicide attack. Studies Conf. Terrorism 27: 243 – 281. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Atran, S. 2006b. The moral logic and growth of suicide terrorism. Wash. Quart. 29: 127 – 147. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bartels, D. & D.L. Medin. 2007. Are morally motivated decision makers insensitive to the consequences of their choices? Psychol. Sci. 18: 24 – 28. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Berns, G.S., E. Bell, C.M. Capra, et al. 2012. The price of your soul: neural evidence for the non‐utilitarian representation of sacred values. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 367: 754 – 762. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Berns, G.S., E. Bell, M. Capra, et al. 2013. Moral Outrage and the Neurobiological Antecedents to Political Conflict. Dayton, OH: Presented to AFOSR Annual Trust and Influence Review. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Boyd, R., H. Gintis & S. Bowles. 2010. Coordinated punishment of defectors sustains cooperation and can proliferate when rare. Science 328: 617. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Vukov, J., F.L. Pinheiro, F.C. Santos & J.M. Pacheco. 2013. Reward from punishment does not emerge at all costs. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9: e1002868. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.