View Item 

Show simple item record

Sacred values in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: resistance to social influence, temporal discounting, and exit strategies
dc.contributor.authorSheikh, Hammaden_US
dc.contributor.authorGinges, Jeremyen_US
dc.contributor.authorAtran, Scotten_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-23T15:58:47Z
dc.date.available2014-11-03T16:20:37Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationSheikh, Hammad; Ginges, Jeremy; Atran, Scott (2013). "Sacred values in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: resistance to social influence, temporal discounting, and exit strategies." Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1299(1): 11-24. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106804>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0077-8923en_US
dc.identifier.issn1749-6632en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106804
dc.publisherWhite Houseen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherPalestiniansen_US
dc.subject.otherDevoted Actorsen_US
dc.subject.otherIntergroup Conflicten_US
dc.subject.otherProtected Valuesen_US
dc.subject.otherSacred Valuesen_US
dc.titleSacred values in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: resistance to social influence, temporal discounting, and exit strategiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelScience (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106804/1/nyas12275.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nyas.12275en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSkitka, L.J. 2010. The psychology of moral conviction. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 4: 267 – 281.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson, D. 2005. God's punishment and public goods: a test of the supernatural punishment hypothesis in 186 world cultures. Hum. Nat. 16: 410 – 446.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischer, R., R. Callander, P. Reddish & J. Bulbulia. 2013. How do rituals affect cooperation? An experimental field study comparing ritual types. Hum. Nat. 24: 115 – 125. doi 10.1007/s12110‐013‐9167‐y.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaglieri, F., A. Borghi, L. Colzato, et al. 2013. Heaven can wait. How religion modulates temporal discounting. Psychol. Res.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Bavel, J.J., D.J. Packer, I.J. Haas, & W.A. Cunningham. 2012. The importance of moral construal: moral versus non‐moral construal elicits faster, more extreme, universal evaluations of the same actions. PloS one, 7 ( 11 ): e48693.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDurkheim, E. 1995 (1912). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEliade, M. 1957. The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRappaport, R.A. 1971. The sacred in human evolution. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2: 23 – 44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSheikh, H., J. Ginges, A. Coman & S. Atran. 2012. Religion, group threat and sacred values. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 7: 110 – 118.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAsch, S.E. 1956. Studies of independence and conformity. I: a minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychol. Monogr. 70: 1 – 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCialdini, R.B. & N. J. Goldstein. 2004. Social influence: compliance and conformity. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 55: 591 – 621.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoscovici, S. 1985. Social influence and conformity. Handbook Soc. Psychol. 2: 347 – 412.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMalhotra, D. & J. Ginges. 2010. Preferring balanced vs. advantageous peace agreements: a study of Israeli attitudes towards a two state solution. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 5: 420 – 427.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCota, A.A., C.R. Evans, K.L. Dion, et al. 1995. The structure of group cohesion. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 21: 572 – 580.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwann, W.B., J. Jetten, Á. Gómez, et al. 2012. When group membership gets personal: a theory of identity fusion. Psychol. Rev. 119: 441 – 456.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFiedler, K. 2007. Construal level theory as an integrative framework for behavioral decision‐making research and consumer psychology. J. Consum. Psychol. 17: 101 – 106.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrope, Y. & N. Liberman. 2010. Construal‐level theory of psychological distance. Psychol. Rev. 117: 440 – 463.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrope, Y. & N. Liberman. 2010. Construal‐level theory of psychological distance. Psychol. Rev. 117: 440 – 463.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGinges, J. & S. Atran. 2008. Humiliation and the inertia effect: implications for understanding violence and compromise in intractable intergroup conflicts. J. Cogn. Cult. 8: 3 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtran, S. & R. Axelrod. 2008. Reframing sacred values. Negotiation J. 24: 221 – 246.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDarwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollier, P., A. Hoeffler & D. Rohner. 2009. Beyond greed and grievance: feasibility and civil war. Oxford Econ. Pap. 61: 1 – 27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFearon, J. D. & D.D. Laitin. 2003. Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 97: 75 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoss, M.L. 2004. What do we know about natural resources and civil war? J. Peace Res. 41: 337 – 356.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFearon, J.D. 2004. Why do some civil wars last so much longer than others? J. Peace Res. 41: 275 – 301.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeirowitz, A. & A.E. Sartori. 2008. Strategic uncertainty as a cause of war. Quart. J. Polit. Sci. 3: 327 – 352.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTetlock, P.E., O.V. Kristel, S.B. Elson, et al. 2000. The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade‐offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 78: 853.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtran, S. 2006a. “ Devoted Actor” versus “Rational Actor” Models for Understanding World Conflict, Briefing to the National Security Council, White House, Washington, DC, September 14; available at http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/atran06/atran06_index.htmlen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNyhamar, T. 1997. Rationality explanations: the case of Kissinger's decision to supply arms to Angola. Coop. Confl. 32: 181 – 205.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin, L. 1999. The contributions of rational choice: a defense of pluralism. Int. Secur. 24: 74 – 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtran, S. & J. Ginges. 2012. Religious and sacred imperatives in human conflict. Science 336: 855 – 857.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGinges, J., S. Atran, D. Medin & K. Shikaki. 2007. Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflict. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104: 7357 – 7360.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGinges, J., S. Atran, S. Sachdeva & D. Medin. 2011. Psychology out of the laboratory: the challenge of violent extremism. Am. Psychol. 66: 507.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGinges, J. & S. Atran. 2013. “ Sacred values and cultural conflict.” In Advances in Culture and Psychology. M.J Gelfand, C.Y Chiu & Y.Y Hong, Eds.: vol. 4. New York: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGinges, J. & S. Atran. 2011. War as a moral imperative (not just practical politics by other means). Proc. R. Soc. B 278: 2930 – 2938.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecker, G. 1962. Irrational behavior and economic theory. J. Polit. Econ. 70: 1 – 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimon, H. 1982. Models of Bounded Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar Giroux & Strauss.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJervis, R. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllison, G. & P. Zelikow. 1999. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, 2nd ed. New York: Longman.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGinges, J. & S. Atran. 2009b. What motivates participation in violent political action. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1167: 115 – 123.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtran, S. 2010. Talking to the Enemy: Violent Extremism, Sacred Values, and What it Means to be Human. London: Penguin.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSachdeva, S. & D.L. Medin. 2008. “ Is it more wrong to care less: the effects of more and less on the quantity sensitivity of protected values.” In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2008. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGinges, J. & S. Atran. 2009a. “ Non‐instrumental reasoning over sacred values: an Indonesian field experiment.” In Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 50: Moral Judgment and Decision Making. D. M. Bartels, C. W. Bauman, L. J. Skitka & D. L. Medin, Eds.: 194 – 206. San Diego: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaron, J. & M. Spranca. 1997. Protected values. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes 70: 1 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTetlock, P.E. 2003. Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7: 320 – 324.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtran, S., R. Axelrod & R. Davis. 2007. Sacred barriers to conflict resolution. Science 317: 1039 – 1040.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDehghani, M., R. Iliev, S. Atran, et al. 2009. Emerging sacred values: the Iranian nuclear program. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 4: 990 – 993.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDehghani, M., S. Atran, R. Iliev, et al. 2010. Sacred values and conflict over Iran's nuclear program. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 5: 540 – 546.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSachdeva, S. & D.L. Medin. 2009. Group identity salience in sacred value based cultural conflict: an examination of the Hindu–Muslim identities in the Kashmir and Babri mosque issues. In: Proceedings of the 31th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2009. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSkitka, L.J. 2002. Do the means always justify the ends, or do the ends sometimes justify the means? A value protection model of justice reasoning. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 28: 588 – 597.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoffman, B. & G. McCormick. 2004. Terrorism, signaling, and suicide attack. Studies Conf. Terrorism 27: 243 – 281.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtran, S. 2006b. The moral logic and growth of suicide terrorism. Wash. Quart. 29: 127 – 147.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBartels, D. & D.L. Medin. 2007. Are morally motivated decision makers insensitive to the consequences of their choices? Psychol. Sci. 18: 24 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerns, G.S., E. Bell, C.M. Capra, et al. 2012. The price of your soul: neural evidence for the non‐utilitarian representation of sacred values. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 367: 754 – 762.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerns, G.S., E. Bell, M. Capra, et al. 2013. Moral Outrage and the Neurobiological Antecedents to Political Conflict. Dayton, OH: Presented to AFOSR Annual Trust and Influence Review.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyd, R., H. Gintis & S. Bowles. 2010. Coordinated punishment of defectors sustains cooperation and can proliferate when rare. Science 328: 617.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVukov, J., F.L. Pinheiro, F.C. Santos & J.M. Pacheco. 2013. Reward from punishment does not emerge at all costs. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9: e1002868.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
nyas12275.pdf
Size:
309.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.