Show simple item record

The Prevalence of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health Education and Training in Emergency Medicine Residency Programs: What Do We Know?

dc.contributor.authorMoll, Joelen_US
dc.contributor.authorKrieger, Paulen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoreno‐walton, Lisaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Benjaminen_US
dc.contributor.authorSlaven, Ellenen_US
dc.contributor.authorJames, Theaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHill, Dustinen_US
dc.contributor.authorPodolsky, Susanen_US
dc.contributor.authorCorbin, Theodoreen_US
dc.contributor.authorHeron, Sheryl L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-23T15:58:51Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHSen_US
dc.date.available2014-05-23T15:58:51Z
dc.date.issued2014-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationMoll, Joel; Krieger, Paul; Moreno‐walton, Lisa ; Lee, Benjamin; Slaven, Ellen; James, Thea; Hill, Dustin; Podolsky, Susan; Corbin, Theodore; Heron, Sheryl L. (2014). "The Prevalence of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health Education and Training in Emergency Medicine Residency Programs: What Do We Know?." Academic Emergency Medicine (5): 608-611.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1069-6563en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-2712en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106813
dc.description.abstractBackground The Institute of Medicine, The Joint Commission, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services all have recently highlighted the need for cultural competency and provider education on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender ( LGBT ) health. Forty percent of LGBT patients cite lack of provider education as a barrier to care. Only a few hours of medical school curriculum are devoted to LGBT education, and little is known about LGBT graduate medical education. Objectives The objective of this study was to perform a needs assessment to determine to what degree LGBT health is taught in emergency medicine ( EM ) residency programs and to determine whether program demographics affect inclusion of LGBT health topics. Methods An anonymous survey link was sent to EM residency program directors ( PD s) via the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors listserv. The 12‐item descriptive survey asked the number of actual and desired hours of instruction on LGBT health in the past year. Perceived barriers to LGBT health education and program demographics were also sought. Results There were 124 responses to the survey out of a potential response from 160 programs (response rate of 78%). Twenty‐six percent of the respondents reported that they have ever presented a specific LGBT lecture, and 33% have incorporated topics affecting LGBT health in the didactic curriculum. EM programs presented anywhere from 0 to 8 hours on LGBT health, averaging 45 minutes of instruction in the past year (median = 0 minutes, interquartile range [ IQR ] = 0 to 60 minutes), and PD s support inclusion of anywhere from 0 to 10 hours of dedicated time to LGBT health, with an average of 2.2 hours (median = 2 hours, IQR  = 1 to 3.5 hours) recommended. The majority of respondents have LGBT faculty (64.2%) and residents (56.2%) in their programs. The presence of LGBT faculty and previous LGBT education were associated with a greater number of desired hours on LGBT health. Conclusions The majority of EM residency programs have not presented curricula specific to LGBT health, although PD s desire inclusion of these topics. Further curriculum development is needed to better serve LGBT patients. Resumen Introducción El Institute of Medicine, la Joint Commission y el Department of Health and Human Services han subrayado recientemente la necesidad en la competencia cultural y la educación sanitaria de los profesionales sanitarios sobre lesbianas, gays, bisexuales y transexuales ( LGBT ). El 40% de los pacientes LGBT reconoce una falta de formación de los sanitarios como una barrera en la atención médica. Sólo unas pocas horas del programa universitario de medicina está dedicada a la formación en LGBT , y se sabe poco sobre la formación médica de postgrado sobre LGBT . Objetivos El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar qué grado de formación sanitaria sobre LGBT se enseña en los programas de residencia de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias ( MUE ) y determinar si las características de las personas que realizan el programa afectan a la inclusión de temas sanitarios sobre LGBT . Metodología Se envió un enlace de encuesta anónima a los directores del programa de residencia de la MUE a través de la lista del servidor del Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors. La encuesta descriptiva de 12 ítems preguntó el número de horas reales y deseadas de formación saniataria sobre LGBT en el pasado año. También se buscaron las barreras percibidas para la educación sanitaria sobre LGBT y la demografía del programa. Resultados Hubo 124 respuestas a la encuesta de una respuesta potencial de 160 programas (porcentaje de respuesta del 78%). Un 26% de los encuestados contest que nunca había presentado una clase específica sobre LGBT , y un 33% ha incorporado temas que afectan a la salud de LGBT en el plan de estudios. Los programas de MUE presentaron en cualquier lugar de 0–8 horas de formación sanitaria sobre LGBT , con un promedio de 45 minutos de formación en el pasado año (mediana de 0 minutos, RIC 0 a 60 minutos), y los directores del programa apoyan la inclusión en cualquier lugar de 0 a 10 horas de tiempo dedicado a la formacion sanitaria sobre LGBT , con un promedio recomendado de 2,2 horas (mediana 2, RIC de 1 a 3,5 horas). La mayoría de los encuestados tienen profesores (64,2%) y residentes (56,2%) LGBT en sus programas. La presencia de profesores LGBT y la formación sanitaria previa sobre LGBT se asociaron con un mayor número de horas deseadas sobre formación sanitaria sobre LGBT . Conclusiones La mayoría de los programas de residencia en MUE no ha presentado un plan de estudios específico para formación sanitaria sobre LGBT , aunque los directores del programa desean la inclusión de estos temas. Es necesario el desarrollo de un programa futuro para atender mejor a los pacientes LGBT .en_US
dc.publisherThe National Academies Pressen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleThe Prevalence of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health Education and Training in Emergency Medicine Residency Programs: What Do We Know?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106813/1/acem12368.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106813/2/acem12368-sup-0001-DataSupplementS1.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/acem.12368en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAcademic Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBowman SH, Moreno‐Walton L, Ezenkwele UA, Heron SL. Diversity in emergency medicine education: expanding the horizon. Acad Emerg Med 2011; 18 ( Suppl 2 ): S104 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceObedin‐Maliver JE, Goldsmith ES, Stewart L, et al. Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender‐related content in undergraduate medical education. JAMA 2011; 306: 971 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRankin S, Weber G, Blumenfeld W, Frazer S. 2010 State of the Higher Education for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender People. Available at: http://lgbtq.sdes.ucf.edu/docs/campuspride2010lgbtreportsummary.pdf. Accessed Jan 26, 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUnited States Census. List of Regions and Divisions. Available at: http://www.census.gov/history/www/programs/geography/regions_and_divisions.html.Accessed Jan 26, 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuhn GJ, Wyer PC, Cordell WH, Rowe BH. A survey to determine the prevalence and characteristics of training in evidence‐based medicine in emergency medicine residency programs. J Emerg Med 2005; 28: 353 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAccreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. List of ACGME Accredited Programs and Sponsoring Institutions. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/ads/public/. Accessed Jan 26, 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCommittee on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health Issues and Research Gaps and Opportunities. Board on the Health of Select Populations. The Health of Lesbian Gay, Bisexual and Transgender People: Building a Foundation for Better Understanding. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe Joint Commission. Advancing Effective Communication, Cultural Competence, and Patient and Family Centered Care for the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Community: A Field Guide. Oak Brook, IL: Joint Commission, 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Recommended Actions to Improve the Health and Well‐Being of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Communities. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/secretary/about/lgbthealth.html. Accessed Jan 26, 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGates G. How Many People Are Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender? The Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law. Available at: http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Gates-How-Many-People-LGBT-Apr-2011.pdf. Accessed Jan 26, 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLambda Legal. When Health Care Isn't Caring: Lambda Legal's Survey of Discrimination Against LGBT People and People With HIV. Available at: www.lambdalegal.org/health-care-report. Accessed Jan 26, 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerina DG, Brunett P, Caro DA, et al. The 2011 Model of the Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine. Acad Emerg Med 2012; 19: 19 – 40.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.