Show simple item record

The role of data reuse in the apprenticeship process

dc.contributor.authorKriesberg, Adamen_US
dc.contributor.authorFrank, Rebecca D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFaniel, Ixchel M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYakel, Elizabethen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-23T15:59:03Z
dc.date.available2014-05-23T15:59:03Z
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citationKriesberg, Adam; Frank, Rebecca D.; Faniel, Ixchel M.; Yakel, Elizabeth (2013). "The role of data reuse in the apprenticeship process." Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 50(1): 1-10. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106839>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0044-7870en_US
dc.identifier.issn1550-8390en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106839
dc.description.abstractThe availability of research data through digital repositories has made data reuse a possibility in a growing number of fields. This paper reports on the results of interviews with 27 zoologists, 43 quantitative social scientists and 22 archaeologists. It examines how data reuse contributes to the apprenticeship process and aids students in becoming full members of scholarly disciplines. Specifically, it investigates how data reuse contributes to the processes by which novice researchers join academic communities of practice. We demonstrate how projects involving data reuse provide a unique opportunity for advisors to mentor novices through the process of creating knowledge. In these situations, senior researchers model general reuse practices and impart skills for their students to use in the future when selecting, evaluating, and analyzing data they did not collect. For novices, data reuse constitutes a form of legitimate peripheral participation, a way for them to enter the community of practice by analyzing data that has been previously collected and reflecting on others' methodologies. Our study findings indicate that reuse occurs across each target community studied. They also suggest how repositories can help foster a reuse culture by providing access to data and building trust in research communities.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.titleThe role of data reuse in the apprenticeship processen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInformation and Library Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, School of Information, 105 S. State St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, School of Information, 105 S. State St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, School of Information, 105 S. State St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherOCLC Research, 6565 Kilgour Pl, Dublin, OH 43017en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106839/1/14505001051_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/meet.14505001051en_US
dc.identifier.sourceProceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLouis, K. S., Holdsworth, J. M., Anderson, M. S.,& Campbell, E. G. ( 2007 ). Becoming a Scientist: The Effects of Work‐Group Size and Organizational Climate. The Journal of Higher Education, 78 ( 3 ), 311 – 336.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEdgeworth, M. ( 1991 ). The Act of Discovery: An Ethnography of the Subject‐Object Relation in Archaeological Practice. Durham University, Durham, UK.Retrieved from http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/1481/en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaniel, I. M., Kriesberg, A.,& Yakel, E. ( 2012 ). Data Reuse and Sensemaking Among Novice Social Scientists. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49 ( 1 ), 1 – 10.doi:10.1002/meet.14504901068en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaniel, I.,& Yakel, E. ( 2011 ). Significant properties as contextual metadata. Journal of Library Metadata, 11,( 3‐4 ), 155 – 165.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGieryn, T. F. ( 1983 ). Boundary‐Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non‐Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 48,( 6 ), 781 – 795.doi:10.2307/2095325en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGray, P. W.,& Jordan, S. R. ( 2012 ). Supervisors and Academic Integrity: Supervisors as Exemplars and Mentors. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10,( 4 ), 299 – 311.doi:10.1007/s10805‐012‐9155‐6en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHackett, E. J. ( 1990 ). Science as a Vocation in the 1990s: The Changing Organizational Culture of Academic Science. The Journal of Higher Education, 61,( 3 ), 241 – 279.doi:10.2307/1982130en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHockey, J. ( 1996 ). A Contractual Solution to Problems in the Supervision of Phd Degrees in the UK. Studies in Higher Education, 21,( 3 ), 359 – 371.doi:10.1080/03075079612331381271en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolligan, C. ( 2005 ). Fact and Fiction: A Case History of Doctoral Supervision. Educational Research, 47,( 3 ), 267 – 278.doi:10.1080/00131880500287179en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIves, G.,& Rowley, G. ( 2005 ). Supervisor Selection or Allocation and Continuity of Supervision: Ph.d. Students’ Progress and Outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30 ( 5 ), 535 – 555.doi:10.1080/03075070500249161en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKam, B. H. ( 1997 ). Style and Quality in Research Supervision: The Supervisor Dependency Factor. Higher Education, 34 ( 1 ), 81 – 103.doi:10.1023/A:1002946922952en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLave, J.,& Wenger, E. ( 1991 ). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge [England]; New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee, A. ( 2008 ). How Are Doctoral Students Supervised? Concepts of Doctoral Research Supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33,( 3 ), 267 – 281.doi:10.1080/03075070802049202en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaglis, L. L., Green, S. G.,& Bauer, T. N. ( 2006 ). Does Adviser Mentoring Add Value? A Longitudinal Study of Mentoring and Doctoral Student Outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 47 ( 4 ), 451 – 476.doi:10.1007/s11162‐005‐9003‐2en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePyburn, K. A. ( 2003 ). What Are We Really Teaching in Archaeological Field Schools? In L. J. Zimmerman, K. D. Vitelli,& J. Hollowell‐Zimmer (Eds.), Ethical Issues in Archaeology (pp. 213 – 223 ). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStar, S. L.,& Griesemer, J. R. ( 1989 ). Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907‐39. Social Studies of Science, 19,( 3 ), 387 – 420.doi:10.1177/030631289019003001en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan House, N. A., Butler, M. H.,& Schiff, L. R. ( 1998 ). Cooperative Knowledge Work and Practices of Trust: Sharing Environmental Planning Data Sets.In Proceedings of the 1998 ACM Conference On Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 335 – 343 ).Presented at the CSCW ‘98, Seattle, Washington: ACM. doi:10.1145/289444.289508en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Maanen, J.,& Schein, E. H. ( 1979 ). Toward a Theory of Organizational Socialization.In B. Staw (Ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 209 – 264 ). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVardigan, M.,& Whiteman, C. ( 2007 ). ICPSR Meets OAIS: Applying the OAIS Reference Model to the Social Science Archive Context. Archival Science, 7,( 1 ), 73 – 87.doi:10.1007/s10502‐006‐9037‐zen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYakel, E., Faniel, I. M., Kriesberg, A.,& Yoon, A. ( 2013 ). Trust in Digital Repositories. International Journal of Digital Curation.doi:10.2218/ijdc.v8i1.251en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZimmerman, A. ( 2007 ). Not by Metadata Alone: The Use of Diverse Forms of Knowledge to Locate Data for Reuse. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 7,( 1‐2 ), 5 – 16.doi:10.1007/s00799‐007‐0015‐8en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, M. S.,& Louis, K. S. ( 1994 ). The Graduate Student Experience and Subscription to the Norms of Science. Research in Higher Education, 35 ( 3 ), 273 – 299.doi:10.1007/BF02496825en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, M. S., Oju, E. C.,& Falkner, T. M. R. ( 2001 ). Help from Faculty: Findings from the Acadia Institute Graduate Education Study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7 ( 4 ), 487 – 503.doi:10.1007/s11948‐001‐0006‐xen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBen‐Yehuda, N. ( 1986 ). Deviance in Science Towards the Criminology of Science. British Journal of Criminology, 26 ( 1 ), 1 – 27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBragg, A. K. ( 1976 ). The Socialization Process in Higher Education (No. ERIC/Higher Education Research Report No. 7.). Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education.Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED132909en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, J. S., Collins, A.,& Duguid, P. ( 1989 ). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18 ( 1 ), 32 – 42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark, S. M.,& Corcoran, M. ( 1986 ). Perspectives on the Professional Socialization of Women Faculty: A Case of Accumulative Disadvantage? The Journal of Higher Education, 57 ( 1 ), 20 – 43.doi:10.2307/1981464en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins, A., Brown, J. S.,& Holum, A. ( 1991 ). Cognitive Apprenticeship: Making Things Visible. American Educator: The Professional Journal of the American Federation of Teachers, 15,( 3 ), 6 – 11, 38‐46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDaniels, M., Faniel, I., Fear, K.,& Yakel, E. ( 2012 ). Managing Fixity and Fluidity in Data Repositories.In Proceedings of the 2012 iConference (pp. 279 – 286 ).Presented at the iConference 2012, Toronto, Canada: ACM. doi:10.1145/2132176.2132212en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDenicolo, P. ( 2004 ). Doctoral Supervision of Colleagues: Peeling Off the Veneer of Satisfaction and Competence. Studies in Higher Education, 29 ( 6 ), 693 – 707.doi: 10.1080/0307507042000287203en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuguid, P. ( 2005 ). “The Art of Knowing”: Social and Tacit Dimensions of Knowledge and the Limits of the Community of Practice. The Information Society, 21,( 2 ), 109 – 118.doi:10.1080/01972240590925311en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record