View Item 

Show simple item record

Piloting a Nationally Disseminated, Interactive Human Subjects Protection Program for Community Partners: Design, Content, and Evaluation
dc.contributor.authorSolomon, Stephanieen_US
dc.contributor.authorEakin, Brendaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKirk, Rosalinden_US
dc.contributor.authorPiechowski, Patriciaen_US
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Barbaraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-23T15:59:19Z
dc.date.available2015-06-01T15:48:45Zen_US
dc.date.issued2014-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationSolomon, Stephanie; Eakin, Brenda; Kirk, Rosalind; Piechowski, Patricia; Thomas, Barbara (2014). "Piloting a Nationally Disseminated, Interactive Human Subjects Protection Program for Community Partners: Design, Content, and Evaluation." Clinical and Translational Science 7(2): 177-183.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1752-8054en_US
dc.identifier.issn1752-8062en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106876
dc.description.abstractFunders, institutions, and research organizations are increasingly recognizing the need for human subjects protections training programs for those engaged in academic research. Current programs tend to be online and directed toward an audience of academic researchers. Research teams now include many nonacademic members, such as community partners, who are less likely to respond to either the method or the content of current online trainings. A team at the CTSA‐supported Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research at the University of Michigan developed a pilot human subjects protection training program for community partners that is both locally implemented and adaptable to local contexts, yet nationally consistent and deliverable from a central administrative source. Here, the developers and the analysts of this program discuss its development, its content, and the results of its evaluation.en_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherIRBen_US
dc.subject.otherResearch Ethicsen_US
dc.subject.otherCommunity Partnersen_US
dc.subject.otherEthics Trainingen_US
dc.titlePiloting a Nationally Disseminated, Interactive Human Subjects Protection Program for Community Partners: Design, Content, and Evaluationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPharmacy and Pharmacologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106876/1/cts12154.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cts.12154en_US
dc.identifier.sourceClinical and Translational Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeto B. Required education on the protection of human subjects: an NIH initiative. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2001; 11 ( 1 ): 8 – 90. doi: 10.1353/ken.2001.0007.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallerstein N, Duran B. Community‐based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. J Inf. 2010; 100 ( S1 ). Available at: http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2009.184036. Accessed June 26, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimonds VW, Wallerstein N, Duran B, Villegas M. Peer reviewed: community‐based participatory research: its role in future cancer research and public health practice. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013; 10. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3666975/. Accessed June 26, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWyatt A. Public and private investments and resources for community‐based participatory research. In: Community‐Based Participatory Health Research: Issues, Methods, and Translation to Practice. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2013: 79 – 110.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGilbert GH, Richman JS, Gordan VV, Rindal DB, Fellows JL, Benjamin PL, Wallace‐Dawson M, Williams OD; DPBRN Collaborative Group. Lessons learned during the conduct of clinical studies in the dental PBRN. J Dent Educ. 2011; 75 ( 4 ): 453 – 465.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCastleden H, Morgan VS, Lamb C. “I spent the first year drinking tea”: exploring Canadian university researchers’ perspectives on community‐based participatory research involving Indigenous peoples. Can Geogr Géographe Can. 2012; 56 ( 2 ): 160 – 179.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLebus GF, Collinge CA. Research in a non‐academic setting: it can be done. J Orthop Trauma. 2011; 25: S128 – S130.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlicker S, Travers R, Guta A, McDonald S, Meagher A. Ethical dilemmas in community‐based participatory research: recommendations for Institutional Review Boards. J Urban Health. 2007; 84 ( 4 ): 478 – 493.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhanlou N, Peter E. Participatory action research: considerations for ethical review. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 60 ( 10 ): 2333 – 2340.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarshall PA, Rotimi C. Ethical challenges in community‐based research. Am J Med Sci. 2001; 322 ( 5 ): 241 – 245.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReid C, Brief E. Confronting condescending ethics: how community‐based research challenges traditional approaches to consent, confidentiality, and capacity. J Acad Ethics 2009; 7: 75 – 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShore N. Community‐based participatory research and the ethics review process. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2007; 2 ( 1 ): 31 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Institutes of Health. NOT‐OD‐00–039: Required education in the protection of human research participants. 2010. Available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice‐files/NOT‐OD‐00‐039.html. Accessed June 27, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBraunschweiger P, Goodman KW. The CITI program: an international online resource for education in human subjects protection and the responsible conduct of research. Acad Med. 2007; 82 ( 9 ): 861 – 864.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson EE, Solomon S, Heitman E, DuBois JM, Fisher CB, Kost RG, Lawless ME, Ramsey C, Jones B, Ammerman A, et al. Research ethics education for community‐engaged research: a review and research agenda. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012; 7 ( 2 ): 3 – 19.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSolomon S, Piechowski PJ. Developing community partner training: regulations and relationships. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011; 6 ( 2 ): 23 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen ML, Ellis PJ. Impact of an evidence‐based medicine curriculum based on adult learning theory. J Gen Intern Med. 1997; 12 ( 12 ): 742 – 750.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKurtz SM, Silverman DJ, Draper J, van Dalen J, Platt FW. Teaching and Learning Communication Skills in Medicine. Oxford: Radcliffe Pub; 2005. Available at: http://www.lavoisier.fr/livre/notice.asp?id=RSAWLLAA3L2OWT. Accessed September 12, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBylund CL, Brown RF, di Ciccone BL, Levin TT, Gueguen JA, Hill C, Kissane DW. Training faculty to facilitate communication skills training: development and evaluation of a workshop. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 70 ( 3 ): 430 – 436.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
cts12154.pdf
Size:
295.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.