View Item 

Show simple item record

Primate spatial strategies and cognition: Introduction to this special issue
dc.contributor.authorGarber, Paul A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDolins, Francine L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-23T15:59:24Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHSen_US
dc.date.available2014-05-23T15:59:24Z
dc.date.issued2014-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationGarber, Paul A.; Dolins, Francine L. (2014). "Primate spatial strategies and cognition: Introduction to this special issue." American Journal of Primatology 76(5): 393-398.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0275-2565en_US
dc.identifier.issn1098-2345en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106890
dc.publisherUniversity of Chicago Pressen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherProblem‐Solvingen_US
dc.subject.otherNavigationen_US
dc.subject.otherDecision‐Makingen_US
dc.subject.otherForagingen_US
dc.subject.otherSpatial Memoryen_US
dc.titlePrimate spatial strategies and cognition: Introduction to this special issueen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106890/1/ajp22257.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ajp.22257en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Primatologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoucet B. 1993. Spatial cognitive maps in animals: new hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanism. Psychological Review 100: 163 – 182.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanson CH. 1998. Experimental evidence for spatial memory in foraging wild capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Animal Behavior 55: 1229 – 1243.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanson C. this issue. Death of the (traveling) salesman: primates do not show clear evidence of multi‐step route planning. American Journal of Primatology.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKillian NJ, Jutras MJ, Buffalo EA. 2012. A map of visual space in the primate entorhinal cortex. Nature 491: 761 – 764.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMendes N, Call J. this issue. Chimpanzees form long‐term memories for food locations after limited exposure. American Journal of Primatology.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMenzel C. 2010. Spatial cognition and memory in symbol‐using chimpanzees. In: Dolins FL, Mitchell RW, editors. Spatial cognition, spatial perception: mapping the self and space. London, UK: Cambridge University Press. p 539 – 564.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNormand E, Boesch C. 2009. Sophisticated Euclidean maps in forest chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour 77: 1195 – 1201.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNoser R, Byrne RW. this issue. Change point analysis of travel routes reveals novel insights into foraging strategies and cognitive maps of wild baboons. American Journal of Primatology.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePark H‐J, Friston K. 2013. Structural and functional brain networks: from connections to cognition science. Science 342: 1238411.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhillips KA, Thompson CR. 2013. Hand preference for tool‐use in capuchin monkeys ( Cebus apella ) is associated with asymmetry of the primary motor cortex. American Journal of Primatology 75: 435 – 440.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQi X‐G, Li B‐G, Garber PA, Ji W, Watanabe K. 2009. Social dynamics of the golden snub‐nosed monkey ( Rhinopithecus roxellana ): female transfer and one‐male unit succession. American Journal of Primatology 71: 670 – 679.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRapoport SI. 1999. How did the human brain evolve ? Brain Research Bulletin 50: 149 – 165.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRilling JK. 2006. Human and nonhuman primate brains: are they allometrically scaled versions of the same design ? Evolutionary Anthropology 15: 65 – 77.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchreier AL, Grove M. this issue. Recurrent patterning in the daily foraging routes of hamadryas baboons ( Papio hamadryas ): spatial memory in large‐scale versus small‐scale space. American Journal of Primatology.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShaffer CA. this issue. Spatial foraging in free ranging bearded sakis: traveling salesmen or Lévy walkers ? American Journal of Primatology.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSolstad T, Boccara CN, Kropff D, Moser M‐B, Moser EI. 2008. Representation of geometric borders in the entorhinal cortex. Science 322: 1865 – 1868.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpiers HJ. 2012. Hippocampal formation. In: Ramachandran VS, editor. The encyclopedia of human behavior. vol 2. New York, NY: Academic Press. p 297 – 304.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSuarez S, Karro J, Kipper J, et al. this issue. A comparison of computer‐generated and naturally‐occurring foraging patterns in route‐network‐constrained spider monkeys. American Journal of Primatology.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTomasello M, Call J. 1997. Primate cognition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhitlock JR, Sutherland RJ, Witter MP, Moser M‐B, Moser EI. 2008. Navigating from hippocampus to parietal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 14755 – 14762.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArajo IET, Rolls ET, Stringer SM. 2001. A view model which accounts for the spatial fields of hippocampal primate spatial view cells and rat place cells. Hippocampus 11: 699 – 706.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarrett L, Henzi P, Dunbar R. 2003. Primate cognition: from “what now?” to “what if ? ” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 494 – 497.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarton RA. 2006. Primate brain evolution: integrating comparative neurophysiological, and ethological data. Evolutionary Anthropology 15: 224 – 236.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceByrne RW. 2000. How monkeys find their way: leadership, coordination, and cognitive maps of African baboons. In: Boinski S, Garber PA, editors. On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. p 491 – 518.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceByrne RW, Noser R, Bates L, Jupp P. 2009. How did they get here from there? Detecting changes of direction in terrestrial ranging. Animal Behaviour 77: 619 – 631.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClayton NS, Bussey TJ, Dickinson A. 2003. Can animals recall the past and plan for the future ? National Review of Neuroscience 4: 685 – 691.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Lillo C, Kirby M, James F. this issue. Spatial working memory in immersive virtual reality foraging: path organization, traveling distance and search efficiency in humans ( Homo sapiens ). American Journal of Primatology.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDolins FL. 2009. Captive cotton‐top tamarins' ( Saguinus oedipus oedipus ) use of landmarks to localize hidden food items. American Journal of Primatology 71: 316 – 323.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDolins FL, Mitchell RW. 2010. Linking spatial cognition and spatial perception. In: Dolins FL, Mitchell RW, editors. Spatial cognition, spatial perception: mapping the self and space. London, UK: Cambridge University Press. p 1 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDolins FL, Menzel CR, Klimowicz C, Kelley J. this issue. Using virtual reality to investigate comparative spatial cognitive abilities in chimpanzees and humans. American Journal of Primatology.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoo P, Warren WH, Duchon A, Tarr MJ. 2005. Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map‐ versus landmark‐based navigation of novel shortcuts. Journal of Experimental Psychology 31: 195 – 215.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFyhn FD, Hafting T, Treces A, Moser M‐B, Moser EI. 2007. Hippocampal remapping and grid realignment in the entorhinal cortex. Nature 446: 190 – 194.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarber PA, Brown E. 2006. Use of landmark cues to locate feeding sites in wild capuchin monkeys ( Cebus capucinus ): an experimental field study. In: Estrada A, Garber PA, Pavelka M, Luecke L, editors. New perspectives in the study of Mesoamerican primates: distribution, ecology, behavior and conservation. New York, NY: Kluwer. p 311 – 332.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarber PA, Dolins FL. 2010. Examining spatial cognitive strategies in small‐scale and large‐scale space in tamarin monkeys. In: Dolins FL, Mitchell RW, editors. Spatial cognition, spatial perception: mapping the self and space. London, UK: Cambridge University Press. p 180 – 196.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarber PA, Paciulli LM. 1997. Experimental field study of spatial memory and learning in wild capuchin monkeys ( Cebus capucinus ). Folia Primatologica 68: 236 – 253.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarber PA, Porter LM. this issue. Navigating in small‐scale space: the role of landmarks and resource monitoring in understanding saddleback tamarin travel. American Journal of Primatology.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarber PA, Bicca‐Marques JC, Azevedo‐Lopes MAO. 2009. Primate cognition: integrating social and ecological information in decision‐making. In: Garber PA, Estrada A, Bicca‐Marques JC, Heymann E, Strier KB, editors. South American primates: comparative perspectives in the study of behavior, ecology, and conservation. New York, NY: Springer Press. p 365 – 385.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldman‐Rakic PS. 2010. Circuitry of primate prefrontal cortex and regulation of behavior by representational memory. In: Plum F, editor. Handbook of physiology: section 1: the nervous system volume V, parts 1 & 2: higher functions of the brain. New York, NY: Wiley‐Blackwell. p 373 – 417.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanmaat KRL, Byrne RW, Zuberbuhler K. 2006. Evidence for a spatial memory of fruiting states of rainforest trees in wild mangabeys. Animal Behaviour 72: 797 – 807.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanmaat KRL, Ban SD, Boesch C. 2013. Taï chimpanzees use botanical skills to discover fruit: what we can learn from their mistakes. Animal Cognition 16: 851 – 860.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ajp22257.pdf
Size:
84.83KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.