Show simple item record

A noninvasive handheld assistive device to accommodate essential tremor: A pilot study

dc.contributor.authorPathak, Anupamen_US
dc.contributor.authorRedmond, John A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorChou, Kelvin L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-23T15:59:35Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHSen_US
dc.date.available2014-05-23T15:59:35Z
dc.date.issued2014-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationPathak, Anupam; Redmond, John A.; Allen, Michael; Chou, Kelvin L. (2014). "A noninvasive handheld assistive device to accommodate essential tremor: A pilot study." Movement Disorders 29(6): 838-842.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0885-3185en_US
dc.identifier.issn1531-8257en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106922
dc.description.abstractBackground We explored whether a noninvasive handheld device using Active Cancellation of Tremor (ACT) technology could stabilize tremor‐induced motion of a spoon in individuals with essential tremor (ET). Methods Fifteen ET subjects (9 men, 6 women) performed 3 tasks with the ACT device turned on and off. Tremor severity was rated with the Fahn‐Tolosa‐Marin Tremor Rating Scale (TRS). Subjective improvement was rated by subjects with the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI‐S). Tremor amplitude was measured using device‐embedded accelerometers in 11 subjects. Results TRS scores improved with ACT on (versus off) in all 3 tasks: holding (1.00 ± 0.76 vs. 0.27 ± 0.70; P  = 0.016), eating (1.47 ± 1.06 vs. 0.13 ± 0.64; P  = 0.001), and transferring (1.33 ± 0.82 vs. 0.27 ± 0.59; P  = 0.001). CGI‐S improved with eating and transferring, but not the holding task. Accelerometer measurements demonstrated 71% to 76% reduction in tremor with the ACT device on. Conclusions This noninvasive handheld ACT device can reduce tremor amplitude and severity for eating and transferring tasks in individuals with ET. © 2013 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Societyen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherWilliams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.subject.otherNoninvasive Deviceen_US
dc.subject.otherEssential Tremoren_US
dc.subject.otherTreatmenten_US
dc.titleA noninvasive handheld assistive device to accommodate essential tremor: A pilot studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106922/1/mds25796.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mds.25796en_US
dc.identifier.sourceMovement Disordersen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLouis ED. Essential tremor. Handb Clin Neurol. 2011; 100: 433 ‐ 448.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeuschl G, Raethjen J, Hellriegel H, Elble R. Treatment of patients with essential tremor. Lancet Neurol. 2011; 10: 148 ‐ 161.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCalzetti S, Baratti M, Gresty M, Findley L. Frequency/amplitude characteristics of postural tremor of the hands in a population of patients with bilateral essential tremor: implications for the classification and mechanism of essential tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987; 50: 561 ‐ 567.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFahn S, Tolosa E, Marin C. Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor. In: Jankovic J, Tolosa E, eds. Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1993: 271 ‐ 280.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeuschl G, Bain P, Brin M. Consensus statement of the Movement Disorder Society on Tremor. Ad Hoc Scientific Committee. Mov Disord. 1998; 13 (Suppl 3 ): 2 ‐ 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUmemura A, Jaggi JL, Hurtig HI, et al. Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders: morbidity and mortality in 109 patients. J Neurosurg. 2003; 98: 779 ‐ 784.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRocon E, Bueno L, Ceres R, Calderon L, Pons JL. Theoretical control discussion on tremor supression via biomechanical loading. In: Craddock GM, McCormack LP, Reilly RB, Knops HTP, eds. Assistive Technology—Shaping the Future. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press; 2003: 827 ‐ 831.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRocon E, Ruiz AF, Pons JL, Belda‐Lois JM, Sánchez‐Lacuesta JJ. Rehabilitation robotics: a wearable exo‐skeleton for tremor assessment and suppression. In: 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Barcelona, Spain; 2005: 2271 ‐ 2276.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRocon E, Manto M, Pons J, Camut S, Belda JM. Mechanical suppression of essential tremor. Cerebellum. 2007; 6: 73 ‐ 78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRocon E, Belda‐Lois JM, Ruiz AF, Manto M, Moreno JC, Pons JL. Design and validation of a rehabilitation robotic exoskeleton for tremor assessment and suppression. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007; 15: 367 ‐ 378.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorgan MH, Hewer RL, Cooper R. Application of an objective method of assessing intention tremor—a further study on the use of weights to reduce intention tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1975; 38: 259 ‐ 264.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHewer RL, Cooper R, Morgan MH. An investigation into the value of treating intention tremor by weighting the affected limb. Brain. 1972; 95: 579 ‐ 590.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Connor RJ, Kini MU. Non‐pharmacological and non‐surgical interventions for tremor: a systematic review. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2011; 17: 509 ‐ 515.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.