Show simple item record

Inference for the median residual life function in sequential multiple assignment randomized trials

dc.contributor.authorKidwell, Kelley M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKo, Jin H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWahed, Abdus S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-23T15:59:35Z
dc.date.available2015-06-01T15:48:46Zen_US
dc.date.issued2014-04-30en_US
dc.identifier.citationKidwell, Kelley M.; Ko, Jin H.; Wahed, Abdus S. (2014). "Inference for the median residual life function in sequential multiple assignment randomized trials." Statistics in Medicine 33(9): 1503-1513.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0277-6715en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0258en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106925
dc.description.abstractIn survival analysis, median residual lifetime is often used as a summary measure to assess treatment effectiveness; it is not clear, however, how such a quantity could be estimated for a given dynamic treatment regimen using data from sequential randomized clinical trials. We propose a method to estimate a dynamic treatment regimen‐specific median residual life (MERL) function from sequential multiple assignment randomized trials. We present the MERL estimator, which is based on inverse probability weighting, as well as, two variance estimates for the MERL estimator. One variance estimate follows from Lunceford, Davidian and Tsiatis' 2002 survival function‐based variance estimate and the other uses the sandwich estimator. The MERL estimator is evaluated, and its two variance estimates are compared through simulation studies, showing that the estimator and both variance estimates produce approximately unbiased results in large samples. To demonstrate our methods, the estimator has been applied to data from a sequentially randomized leukemia clinical trial. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherSIAMen_US
dc.subject.otherDynamic Treatment Regimenen_US
dc.subject.otherAdaptive Treatment Strategyen_US
dc.subject.otherInverse Probability Weightingen_US
dc.subject.otherMedian Residual Life Functionen_US
dc.subject.otherSequential Randomizationen_US
dc.subject.otherNon‐Parametric Estimationen_US
dc.titleInference for the median residual life function in sequential multiple assignment randomized trialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Dataen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106925/1/sim6042.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/sim.6042en_US
dc.identifier.sourceStatistics in Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSong JK, Cho GY. A note on percentile residual life. Sankhya 1995; 57: 333 – 335.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCsorgo M, S C. Estimation of percentile residual life. Operations Research 1987; 35: 598 – 605.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChung CF. Confidence bands for percentile residual lifetime under random censorship mode. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 1989; 29: 94 – 126.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeng Z, Kulasekera KB. Nonparametric estimation of the percentile residual life function. Communications in Statistics‐ Theory and Methods 1991; 20: 87 – 105.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLillo RE. On the median residual lifetime and its aging properties: a characterization theorem and applications. Naval Research Logistics 2005; 4: 370 – 380.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolland PW. Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1986; 81: 945 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWahed AS, Tsiatis AA. Optimal estimator for the survival distribution and related quantities for treatment policies in two‐stage randomization designs in clinical trials. Biometrics 2004; 60: 124 – 133.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWahed AS, Tsiatis AA. Semi‐parametric efficient estimation of the survival distribution for treatment policies in two‐stage randomization designs in clinical trials with censored data. Biometrika 2006; 93: 147 – 161.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuo X, Tsiatis AA. A weighted risk set estimator for survival distributions in two‐stage randomization designs with censored survival data. The International Journal of Biostatistics 2005; 1: 1 – 15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmittlein DC, Morrison DG. The median residual lifetime: a characterization theorem and an application. Operations Research 1981; 29 ( 2 ): 392 – 399.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaines AL, Singpurwalla ND. Some contributions to the stochastic characterization of wear. In Reliability and Biometry, Proschan F, Serfling RJ (eds). SIAM: Philadelphia, 1974.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArnold BC, Brokett PL. When does the β th percentile residual life function determine the distribution? Operations Research 1983; 31: 391 – 396.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJoe H, Proschan F. Percentile residual life functions. Operations Research 1984; 32: 668 – 678.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJoe H. Characterizations of life distributions from percentile residual lifetimes. Annals of the Insititue for Statistical Mathematics 1985; 37: 165 – 172.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKo JH. Statistical issues in the design and analysis of sequentially randomized trials. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, 2010.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKidwell KM, Wahed AS. Weighted log‐rank statistic to compare shared‐path adaptive treatment strategies. Biostatistics 2013; 14 ( 2 ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStefanski LA, Boos DD. The calculus of m‐estimation. The American Statistician 2002; 56 ( 1 ): 29 – 38.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJeong J, Jung S, Costantino J. Nonparametric inference on median residual lifetimes in breast cancer patients. Biometrics 2008; 64: 157 – 163.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCole SR, Frangakis CE. The consistency statement in causal inference: a definition or an assumption? Epidemiology 2009; 20 ( 1 ): 3 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy SA. An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies. Statistical Methods 2005; 24: 1455 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLavori PW, Dawson R, J RA. Flexible treatment strategies in chronic disease: clinical research implications. Biological Psychology 2000; 48: 605 – 614.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStone RM, Berg DT, George SL, Dodge RK, Paciucci PA, Schulman P, Lee EJ, Moore JO, Powell BL, Schiffer CA. Granulocytemacrophage colony‐stimulating factor after initial chemotherapy for elderly patients with primary acute myelogenous leukemia. The New England Journal of Medicine 1995; 332: 1671 – 1677.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStone RM, Berg DT, George SL, Dodge RK, Paciucci PA, Schulman P, Lee EJ, Moore JO, Powell BL, Baer MR, Bloomfield CD, Schiffer CA. Postremission therapy in older patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a randomized trial comparing mitoxantrone and intermediate‐dose cytarabine with standard‐dose cytarabine. Blood 2001; 98: 548 – 553.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLunceford JK, Davidian M, Tsiatis AA. Estimation of survival distributions of treatment policies in two‐stage randomization designs in clinical trials. Biometrics 2002; 58: 48 – 57.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobins JM, Rotnitzky A, Zhao LP. Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed. Journal of American Statistical Association 1994; 89: 846 – 866.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.