View Item 

Show simple item record

Education and Decision Making at the Time of Triptan Prescribing: Patient Expectations vs Actual Practice

dc.contributor.authorMathew, Paul G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPavlovic, Jelena M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLettich, Alyssaen_US
dc.contributor.authorWells, Rebecca E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, Carrie E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMullin, Kathleenen_US
dc.contributor.authorCharleston IV, Larryen_US
dc.contributor.authorDodick, David W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchwedt, Todd J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-23T15:59:43Z
dc.date.available2015-06-01T15:48:46Zen_US
dc.date.issued2014-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationMathew, Paul G.; Pavlovic, Jelena M.; Lettich, Alyssa; Wells, Rebecca E.; Robertson, Carrie E.; Mullin, Kathleen; Charleston IV, Larry; Dodick, David W.; Schwedt, Todd J. (2014). "Education and Decision Making at the Time of Triptan Prescribing: Patient Expectations vs Actual Practice." Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain (4): 698-708.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0017-8748en_US
dc.identifier.issn1526-4610en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106941
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleEducation and Decision Making at the Time of Triptan Prescribing: Patient Expectations vs Actual Practiceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106941/1/head12308.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/head.12308en_US
dc.identifier.sourceHeadache: The Journal of Head and Face Painen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBackes AC, Kuo GM. The association between functional health literacy and patient‐reported recall of medications at outpatient pharmacies. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2012; 8: 349 ‐ 354.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCharles C, Whelan T, Gafni A. What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? BMJ. 1999; 319: 780 ‐ 782.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoder E. Triptan therapy in migraine. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 63 ‐ 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBigal ME, Buse DC, Chen YT, et al. Rates and predictors of starting a triptan: Results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study. Headache. 2010; 50: 1440 ‐ 1448.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChu MK, Buse DC, Bigal ME, Serrano D, Lipton RB. Factors associated with triptan use in episodic migraine: Results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study. Headache. 2012; 52: 213 ‐ 223.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLipton RB, Serrano D, Holland S, Fanning KM, Reed ML, Buse DC. Barriers to the diagnosis and treatment of migraine: Effects of sex, income, and headache features. Headache. 2013; 53: 81 ‐ 92.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolland S, Fanning KM, Serrano D, Buse DC, Reed ML, Lipton RB. Rates and reasons for discontinuation of triptans and opioids in episodic migraine: Results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) study. J Neurol Sci. 2013; 326: 10 ‐ 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCady RK, Maizels M, Reeves DL, Levinson DM, Evans JK. Predictors of adherence to triptans: Factors of sustained vs lapsed users. Headache. 2009; 49: 386 ‐ 394.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSilberstein SD, Dodick D, Kesslick J. Removing barriers to appropriate migraine treatment: Formulary limitations and triptan package size. Headache. 2005; 45: 1250 ‐ 1254.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRothrock JF, Morey V. “Mixing triptans”: Patient satisfaction. Headache. 2011; 51: 135 ‐ 140.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlsen B, Hole AR, Kolstad JR, Norheim OF. When you can't have the cake and eat it too: A study of medical doctors' priorities in complex choice situations. Soc Sci Med. 2012; 75: 1964 ‐ 1973.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrupat E, Rosenkranz SL, Yeager CM, Barnard K, Putnam SM, Inui TS. The practice orientations of physicians and patients: The effect of doctor‐patient congruence on satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2000; 39: 49 ‐ 59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMira JJ, Guilabert M, Pérez‐Jover V, Lorenzo S. Barriers for an effective communication around clinical decision making: An analysis of the gaps between doctors' and patients' point of view. Health Expect. 2012; doi: 10.1111/j.1369‐7625.2012.00809.x.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarty H, Bogenstätter Y, Franc G, Tschan F, Zimmermann H. How well informed are patients when leaving the emergency department? Comparing information provided and information retained. Emerg Med J. 2013; 30: 53 ‐ 57.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSelic P, Svab I, Repolusk M, Gucek NK. What factors affect patients' recall of general practitioners' advice? BMC Fam Pract. 2011; 12: 141.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBravo BN, Postigo JM, Segura LR, et al. Effect of the evaluation of recall on the rate of information recalled by patients in primary care. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 81: 272 ‐ 274.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTeng EJ, Petersen NJ, Hartman C, et al. Effects of depression and social support on comprehension and recall of informed consent information among Parkinson disease patients and their caregivers. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2012; 43: 67 ‐ 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZeng‐Treitler Q, Kim H, Hunter M. Improving patient comprehension and recall of discharge instructions by supplementing free texts with pictographs. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008;Nov 6: 849 ‐ 853.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWatson PW, McKinstry B. A systematic review of interventions to improve recall of medical advice in healthcare consultations. J R Soc Med. 2009; 102: 235 ‐ 243.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSandberg EH, Sharma R, Sandberg WS. Deficits in retention for verbally presented medical information. Anesthesiology. 2012; 117: 772 ‐ 779.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
head12308.pdf
Size:
73.86KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.