View Item 

Show simple item record

Multicenter trial of the proficiency of smart quantitative sensation tests

dc.contributor.authorDyck, Peter J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorArgyros, Barbaraen_US
dc.contributor.authorRussell, James W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGahnstrom, Linde E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNalepa, Susanen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlbers, James W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLodermeier, Karen A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZafft, Andrew J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDyck, P. James B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKlein, Christopher J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLitchy, William J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Jenny L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCarter, Rickey E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMelton, L. Josephen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-23T16:00:05Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHSen_US
dc.date.available2014-05-23T16:00:05Z
dc.date.issued2014-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationDyck, Peter J.; Argyros, Barbara; Russell, James W.; Gahnstrom, Linde E.; Nalepa, Susan; Albers, James W.; Lodermeier, Karen A.; Zafft, Andrew J.; Dyck, P. James B.; Klein, Christopher J.; Litchy, William J.; Davies, Jenny L.; Carter, Rickey E.; Melton, L. Joseph (2014). "Multicenter trial of the proficiency of smart quantitative sensation tests." Muscle & Nerve 49(5): 645-653.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0148-639Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-4598en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106991
dc.description.abstractIntroduction : We assessed proficiency (accuracy and intra‐ and intertest reproducibility) of smart quantitative sensation tests (smart QSTs) in subjects without and with diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN). Methods : Technologists from 3 medical centers using different but identical QSTs independently assessed 6 modalities of sensation of the foot (or leg) twice in patients without ( n  = 6) and with ( n  = 6) DSPN using smart computer assisted QSTs. Results : Low rates of test abnormalities were observed in health and high rates in DSPN. Very high intraclass correlations were obtained between continuous measures of QSTs and neuropathy signs, symptoms, or nerve conductions (NCs). No significant intra‐ or intertest differences were observed. Conclusions : These results provide proof of concept that smart QSTs provide accurate assessment of sensation loss without intra‐ or intertest differences useful for multicenter trials. Smart technology makes possible efficient testing of body surface area sensation loss in symmetric length‐dependent sensorimotor polyneuropathies. Muscle Nerve 49 : 645–653, 2014en_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherNeurophysiology Testsen_US
dc.subject.otherSmart Quantitative Sensation Testsen_US
dc.subject.otherIntra‐ and Intertest Reproducibilityen_US
dc.subject.otherAccuracy and Reliability of Nerve Testsen_US
dc.subject.otherDiabetic Sensorimotor Polyneuropathyen_US
dc.titleMulticenter trial of the proficiency of smart quantitative sensation testsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106991/1/mus23982.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mus.23982en_US
dc.identifier.sourceMuscle & Nerveen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Brien PC, Dyck PJ. Procedures for setting normal values. Neurology 1995; 45: 17 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDyck PJ, Kennel AJ, Magal IV, Kraybill EN. A Virginia kinship with hereditary sensory neuropathy: peroneal muscular atrophy and pes cavus. Mayo Clin Proc 1965; 40: 685 – 694.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOhta M, Ellefson RD, Lambert EH, Dyck PJ. Hereditary sensory neuropathy, type II. Clinical, electrophysiologic, histologic, and biochemical studies of a Quebec kinship. Arch Neurol 1973; 29: 23 – 37.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDyck PJ, Kratz KM, Lehman KA, Karnes JL, Melton LJ III, O'Brien PC, et al. The Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study: design, criteria for types of neuropathy, selection bias, and reproducibility of neuropathic tests. Neurology 1991; 41: 799 – 807.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFagius J, Wahren LK. Variability of sensory threshold determination in clinical use. J Neurol Sci 1981; 51: 11 – 27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBertelsmann FW, Heimans JJ, Weber EJ, van der Veen EA, Schouten JA. Thermal discrimination thresholds in normal subjects and in patients with diabetic neuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1985; 48: 686 – 690.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg JM, Lindblom U. Standardized method of determining vibratory perception thresholds for diagnosis and screening in neurological investigation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1979; 42: 793 – 803.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDyck PJ, O'Brien PC, Johnson DM, Klein CJ, Dyck PJB. Quantitative sensation testing. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, editors. Peripheral neuropathy, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005. p 1063 – 1094.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDyck PJ, Winkler JA, Andrews KL, Kavros SJ, Vella A, Davies JL. Testing of touch‐pressure sensation: introduction of the touch‐pressure sensogram. In: Dyck PJ, Dyck PJB, Engelstad JK, Low PA, Amrami KK, Spinner RJ, Klein CJ, editors. Companion to peripheral neuropathy illustrated cases and new developments. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2010. p 327 – 329.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZiegler D, Low PA, Litchy WJ, Boulton AJ, Vinik AI, Freeman R, et al. Efficacy and safety of antioxidant treatment with {alpha}‐lipoic acid over 4 years in diabetic polyneuropathy: The NATHAN 1 trial. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 2054 – 2060.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchiffmann R, Kopp JB, Austin HA III, Sabnis S, Moore DF, Weibel T, et al. Enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001; 285: 2743 – 2749.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDyck PJ, Overland CJ, Low PA, Litchy WJ, Davies JL, Dyck PJB, et al. Signs and symptoms versus nerve conduction studies to diagnose diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy: Cl vs. NPhys Trial. Muscle Nerve 2010; 42: 157 – 164.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDyck PJ, Overland CJ, Low PA, Litchy WJ, Davies JL, Dyck PJB, et al. "Unequivocally abnormal" vs. "usual" signs and symptoms for proficient diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy Cl vs. N Phys Trial. Arch Neurol 2012; 69: 1609 – 1614.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDyck PJ, Albers JW, Wolfe J, Bolton CF, Walsh N, Klein CJ, et al. A trial of proficiency of nerve conduction: greater standardization needed. Muscle Nerve 2012 [Epub ahead of print].en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDyck PJ, Curtis DJ, Bushek W, Offord K. Description of "Minnesota Thermal Disks" and normal values of cutaneous thermal discrimination in man. Neurology 1974; 24: 325 – 330.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDyck PJ, Hansen JD, Winkler JA, Witt LV, Davies JL. Thermal disk quantitative sensation testing of cooling discrimination. In: Dyck PJ, Dyck PJB, Engelstad JK, Low PA, Amrami KK, Spinner RJ, Klein CJ, editors. Companion to peripheral neuropathy illustrated cases and new developments. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2010. p 331 – 333.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDyck PJ, Zimmerman IR, O'Brien PC, Ness A, Caskey PE, Karnes J, et al. Introduction of automated systems to evaluate touch‐pressure, vibration, and thermal cutaneous sensation in man. Ann Neurol 1978; 4: 502 – 510.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDyck PJ, Litchy WJ, Lehman KA, Hokanson JL, Low PA, O'Brien PC. Variables influencing neuropathic endpoints: the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study of healthy subjects (RDNS‐HS). Neurology 1995; 45: 1115 – 1121.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDyck PJ, O'Brien PC, Davies J, Klein CJ, Dyck PJB. Nerve tests expressed as percentiles, normal deviates, and composite scores. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, editors. Peripheral neuropathy, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005. p 971 – 984.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420 – 428.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBravenboer B, van Dam PS, Hop J, vd Steenhoven J, Erkelens DW. Thermal threshold testing for the assessment of small fibre dysfunction: normal values and reproducibility. Diabet Med 1992; 9: 546 – 549.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValensi P, Attali JR, Gagant S. Reproducibility of parameters for assessment of diabetic neuropathy. Diabet Med 1993; 10: 933 – 939.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelber DA, Pfeifer MA, Broadstone VL, Munster EW, Peterson M, Arezzo JC, et al. Components of variance for vibratory and thermal threshold testing in normal and diabetic subjects. J Diabetes Complications 1995; 9: 170 – 176.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBril V, Kojic J, Ngo M, Clark K. Comparison of a neurothesiometer and vibration in measuring vibration perception thresholds and relationship to nerve conduction studies. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 1360 – 1362.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValk GD, de Sonnaville JJ, van Houtum WH, Heine RJ, van Eijk JT, Bouter LM, et al. The assessment of diabetic polyneuropathy in daily clinical practice: reproducibility and validity of Semmes Weinstein monofilaments examination and clinical neurological examination. Muscle Nerve 1997; 20: 116 – 118.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChong PS, Cros DP. Technology literature review: quantitative sensory testing. Muscle Nerve 2004; 29: 734 – 747.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoloney NA, Hall TM, O'Sullivan TC, Doody CM. Reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing of the hand in a cohort of young, healthy adults. Muscle Nerve 2011; 44: 547 – 552.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeber C, Klein T, Azad S, Birklein F, Gierthmuhlen J, Huge V, et al. Test‐retest and interobserver reliability of quantitative sensory testing according to the protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): a multi‐centre study. Pain 2011; 152: 548 – 556.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
mus23982.pdf
Size:
304.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.