Comparisons of Patient Satisfaction Levels with Complete Dentures of Different Occlusions: A Randomized Clinical Trial
dc.contributor.author | Shirani, Mohhamadjavad | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mosharraf, Ramin | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Shirany, Mohammadkazem | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-07-03T14:41:24Z | |
dc.date.available | WITHHELD_12_MONTHS | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2014-07-03T14:41:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-06 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Shirani, Mohhamadjavad; Mosharraf, Ramin; Shirany, Mohammadkazem (2014). "Comparisons of Patient Satisfaction Levels with Complete Dentures of Different Occlusions: A Randomized Clinical Trial." Journal of Prosthodontics 23(4): 259-266. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1059-941X | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1532-849X | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/107515 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose There is a lack of evidence to recommend a particular type of posterior occlusal form for conventional complete dentures. The type of posterior occlusal scheme can affect complete denture stability, retention, and patient satisfaction. The objective of this study was to compare patient satisfaction to three types of complete denture occlusion using a randomized, crossover controlled trial. Materials and Methods Three sets of complete dentures were made for each of 15 patients (mean age = 58.87 ± 15.02 years). They received (1) fully bilateral balanced occlusion (BBO), (2) lingualized occlusion, and (3) buccalized occlusion (BO) denture sets in random order. After wearing each set for 6 weeks, patient satisfaction was assessed using a 19‐item version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for Edentulous Patients (OHIP‐EDENT). Each question was scored on a 1 to 5 scale for patients’ problems with dentures (for these ordinal variables, 1 = “never” and 5 = “very often”). These items were first analyzed by Friedman tests and then by Wilcoxon rank tests for 80% test power at the 0.05‐alpha level (d = 0.7). Results BO resulted in lower avoidance of particular foods and physical disability scores than fully BBO. Conclusions With the caution of small sample size, the results of this study provide evidence that use of BO can improve food avoidance and physical disability aspects of patient satisfaction with complete dentures. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Mosby | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Patient Satisfaction | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Complete Denture | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Balanced Dental Occlusion | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Lingualized Occlusion | en_US |
dc.title | Comparisons of Patient Satisfaction Levels with Complete Dentures of Different Occlusions: A Randomized Clinical Trial | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Dentistry | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/107515/1/jopr12101.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/jopr.12101 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of Prosthodontics | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sutton A, McCord J: A randomized clinical trial comparing anatomic, lingualized, and zero‐degree posterior occlusal forms for complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97: 292 ‐ 298 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bohnenkamp DM, Garcia LT: Phonetics and tongue position to improve mandibular denture retention: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98: 344 ‐ 347 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Brunello DL, Mandikos MN: Construction faults, age, gender, and relative medical health: factors associated with complaints in complete denture patients. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 545 ‐ 554 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nikawa H, Makihira S: Research projects related to complete dentures published in 2008 by members of the Japan Prosthodontic Society. J Prosthodont Res 2009; 53: 103 ‐ 106 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Turker SB, Sener ID, Özkan YK: Satisfaction of the complete denture wearers related to various factors. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2009; 49: e126 ‐ e129 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Matsumaru Y: Influence of mandibular residual ridge resorption on objective masticatory measures of lingualized and fully bilateral balanced denture articulation. J Prosthodont Res 2010; 54: 112 ‐ 118 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Engelmeier RL: Early designs for the occlusal anatomy of posterior denture teeth: part III. J Prosthodont 2005; 14: 131 ‐ 136 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shigli K, Angadi GS, Hegde P: The effect of remount procedures on patient comfort for complete denture treatment. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99: 66 ‐ 72 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sutton A, Worthington H, McCord J: RCT comparing posterior occlusal forms for complete dentures. J Dent Res 2007; 86: 651 ‐ 655 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Clough HE, Knodle JM, Leeper SH, et al: A comparison of lingualized occlusion and monoplane occlusion in complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50: 176 ‐ 179 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Khamis MM, Zaki HS, Rudy TE: A comparison of the effect of different occlusal forms in mandibular implant overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 422 ‐ 429 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kimoto S, Ghunji A, Yamakawa A, et al: Prospective clinical trial comparing lingualized occlusion to bilateral balanced occlusion in complete dentures: a pilot study. Int J Prosthodont 2006; 19: 103 ‐ 109 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Racich MJ: Orofacial pain and occlusion: Is there a link? An overview of current concepts and the clinical implications. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 189 ‐ 196 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Carlsson GE, Omar R: The future of complete dentures in oral rehabilitation. A critical review. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37: 143 ‐ 156 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Becker CM, Swoope CC, Guckes AD: Lingualized occlusion for removable prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1977; 38: 601 ‐ 608 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Farias‐Neto A, Carreiro Ada F: Complete denture occlusion: an evidence‐based approach. J Prosthodont 2013; 22: 94 ‐ 97 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Phoenix RD, Engelmeier RL: Lingualized occlusion revisited. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104: 342 ‐ 346 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kydd WL: The comminuting efficiency of varied occlusal tooth form and the associated deformation of the complete denture base. J Am Dent Assoc 1960; 61: 465 ‐ 471 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Heydecke G, Vogeler M, Wolkewitz M, et al: Simplified versus comprehensive fabrication of complete dentures: patient ratings of denture satisfaction from a randomized crossover trial. Quintessence Int 2008; 39: 107 ‐ 116 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 10 ‐ 92 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zarb GA, Bolender CL: Prosthodontic Treatment for Edentulous Patients ( ed 12 ). St. Louis, Mosby, 2004, p. 259 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Allen PF, Locker D: A modified short version of the oral health impact profile for assessing health‐related quality of life in edentulous adults. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 446 ‐ 450 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Adam RZ: Do complete dentures improve the quality of life of patients? Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry and World Health Organisation (WHO) Oral Health Collaborating Centre, University of the Western Cape, 2006 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Jacobson T, Krol A: A contemporary review of the factors involved in complete denture retention, stability, and support. Part I: retention. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 5 ‐ 15 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Jacobson T, Krol A: A contemporary review of the factors involved in complete dentures. Part III: support. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 306 ‐ 313 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Jacobson T, Krol A: A contemporary review of the factors involved in complete dentures. Part II: stability. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 165 ‐ 172 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Celebic A, Knezovic‐Zlataric D: A comparison of patient's satisfaction between complete and partial removable denture wearers. J Dent 2003; 31: 445 ‐ 451 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Divaris K, Ntounis A, Marinis A, et al: Patients’ profiles and perceptions of complete dentures in a university dental clinic. Int J Prosthodont 2012; 25: 145 ‐ 147 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Pan S, Awad M, Thomason JM, et al: Sex differences in denture satisfaction. J Dent 2008; 36: 301 ‐ 308 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fenlon MR, Sherriff M: An investigation of factors influencing patients’ satisfaction with new complete dentures using structural equation modelling. J Dent 2008; 36: 427 ‐ 434 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Patil PG: Conventional complete denture for a left segmental mandibulectomy patient: a clinical report. J Prosthodont Res 2010; 54: 192 ‐ 197 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.