View Item 

Show simple item record

Pilot test of a patient decision aid about liver transplant organ quality
dc.contributor.authorVolk, Michael L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRoney, Meghanen_US
dc.contributor.authorFagerlin, Angelaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-03T14:41:40Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHSen_US
dc.date.available2014-07-03T14:41:40Z
dc.date.issued2014-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationVolk, Michael L.; Roney, Meghan; Fagerlin, Angela (2014). "Pilot test of a patient decision aid about liver transplant organ quality." Liver Transplantation 20(7): 850-855.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1527-6465en_US
dc.identifier.issn1527-6473en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/107583
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titlePilot test of a patient decision aid about liver transplant organ qualityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSurgery and Anesthesiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/107583/1/lt23882.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/lt.23882en_US
dc.identifier.sourceLiver Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreeman RB, Cohen JT. Transplantation risks and the real world: what does 'high risk' really mean? Am J Transplant 2009; 9: 23 ‐ 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiver quality decision aid. http://www.liver‐donor‐quality.com. Accessed April 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeng S, Goodrich NP, Bragg‐Gresham JL, Dykstra DM, Punch JD, DebRoy MA, et al. Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 783 ‐ 790.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrman ES, Barritt AS IV, Wheeler SB, Hayashi PH. Declining liver utilization for transplantation in the United States and the impact of donation after cardiac death. Liver Transpl 2013; 19: 59 ‐ 68.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFagerlin A, Zikmund‐Fisher BJ, Ubel PA. Helping patients decide: ten steps to better risk communication. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011; 103: 1436 ‐ 1443.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFagerlin A, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Zikmund‐Fisher BJ. Making numbers matter: present and future research in risk communication. Am J Health Behav 2007; 31 (suppl 1 ): S47 ‐ S56.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVolk ML, Tocco RS, Pelletier SJ, Zikmund‐Fisher BJ, Lok AS. Patient decision making about organ quality in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2011; 17: 1387 ‐ 1393.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRodrigue JR, Hanto DW, Curry MP. Patients' willingness to accept expanded criteria donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 2011; 11: 1705 ‐ 1711.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZulman DM, Schafenacker A, Barr KL, Moore IT, Fisher J, McCurdy K, et al. Adapting an in‐person patient‐caregiver communication intervention to a tailored Web‐based format. Psychooncology 2012; 21: 336 ‐ 341.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchaubel DE, Sima CS, Goodrich NP, Feng S, Merion RM. The survival benefit of deceased donor liver transplantation as a function of candidate disease severity and donor quality. Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 419 ‐ 425.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWiesner R, Edwards E, Freeman R, Harper A, Kim R, Kamath P, et al.; for United Network for Organ Sharing Liver Disease Severity Score Committee. Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 91 ‐ 96.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974; 185: 1124 ‐ 1131.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacConmara MP, Vachharajani N, Wellen JR, Anderson CD, Lowell JA, Shenoy S, et al. Utilization of hepatitis B core antibody‐positive donor liver grafts. HPB (Oxford) 2012; 14: 42 ‐ 48.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
lt23882.pdf
Size:
294.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.