Analysis of X.500 Distributed Directory Refresh Strategies
dc.contributor.author | Fasulo, Guy A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Klinge, Kevin H. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Makkapati, Sailesh | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bachmann, David W. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kamlet, Michael H. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Teorey, Toby J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bauer, Michael A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bennett, J. Michael | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-07-18T18:11:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-07-18T18:11:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1990-11-08 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | G. A. Fasulo, K. H. Klinge,, S. Makkapati, D. W. Bachmann, M. Kamlet, and T. J. Teorey, "Analysis of X.500 Distributed Directory Refresh Strategies," September 1990. [J. of Database Admin. 2(2), pp. 1-13 (Spring 1991).] <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/107872> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/107872 | |
dc.description.abstract | Distributed database directory refresh strategies, commonly recommended for the X.500 standard, are defined and analytically modeled for variations on push/pull and total/differential under idealistic asynchronous control conditions. The models are implemented in a HyperCard-based tool called DirMod (for "directory model"). Experimental test results show important elapsed time performance tradeoff among the different strategies, and live test data contribute to the verification of the models. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Center for Information Technology Integration | en_US |
dc.title | Analysis of X.500 Distributed Directory Refresh Strategies | en_US |
dc.type | Technical Report | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Computer Science | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Engineering | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Center for Information Technology Integration | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/107872/1/citi-tr-90-6.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Department of (EECS) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.