View Item 

Show simple item record

Analysis of X.500 Distributed Directory Refresh Strategies
dc.contributor.authorFasulo, Guy A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKlinge, Kevin H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMakkapati, Saileshen_US
dc.contributor.authorBachmann, David W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKamlet, Michael H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTeorey, Toby J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBauer, Michael A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBennett, J. Michaelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-18T18:11:43Z
dc.date.available2014-07-18T18:11:43Z
dc.date.issued1990-11-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationG. A. Fasulo, K. H. Klinge,, S. Makkapati, D. W. Bachmann, M. Kamlet, and T. J. Teorey, "Analysis of X.500 Distributed Directory Refresh Strategies," September 1990. [J. of Database Admin. 2(2), pp. 1-13 (Spring 1991).] <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/107872>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/107872
dc.description.abstractDistributed database directory refresh strategies, commonly recommended for the X.500 standard, are defined and analytically modeled for variations on push/pull and total/differential under idealistic asynchronous control conditions. The models are implemented in a HyperCard-based tool called DirMod (for "directory model"). Experimental test results show important elapsed time performance tradeoff among the different strategies, and live test data contribute to the verification of the models.en_US
dc.publisherCenter for Information Technology Integrationen_US
dc.titleAnalysis of X.500 Distributed Directory Refresh Strategiesen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelComputer Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Information Technology Integrationen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/107872/1/citi-tr-90-6.pdf
dc.owningcollnameElectrical Engineering and Computer Science, Department of (EECS)


Files in this item

Name:
citi-tr-90-6.pdf
Size:
113.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.