View Item 

Show simple item record

Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback‐related negativity in the flanker gambling task
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yannien_US
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Lindsay D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBernat, Edward M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGehring, William J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-06T16:49:36Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHSen_US
dc.date.available2014-08-06T16:49:36Z
dc.date.issued2014-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationLiu, Yanni; Nelson, Lindsay D.; Bernat, Edward M.; Gehring, William J. (2014). "Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback‐related negativity in the flanker gambling task." Psychophysiology (8): 782-788.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0048-5772en_US
dc.identifier.issn1469-8986en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/108013
dc.description.abstractA negative deflection in the event‐related potential is enhanced following error‐ and loss‐related feedback in decision‐making and simple gambling tasks. Researchers have assumed that the perceptual properties of the feedback stimuli are unimportant in explaining these effects. This assumption was tested in the present study through a flanker gambling task, in which the perceptual properties of the feedback were manipulated. Consistent with previous studies, loss elicited a larger feedback‐related negativity ( FRN ) than gain feedback. However, this FRN reward effect was modulated by the perceptual properties of the feedback stimuli. When gain and loss feedback were perceptually similar to each other, the enhancement of the FRN following the loss feedback was smaller compared to when the gain and loss feedback were different from each other. In addition, incongruent feedback elicited a larger FRN than congruent feedback; this FRN congruency effect was larger following gain than loss feedback. These results suggested that perceptual properties of the feedback stimuli play a role in the elicitation of the FRN .en_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherFlanker Tasken_US
dc.subject.otherPerceptual Mismatchen_US
dc.subject.otherERPen_US
dc.subject.otherFeedback‐Related Negativityen_US
dc.titlePerceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback‐related negativity in the flanker gambling tasken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108013/1/psyp12216.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/psyp.12216en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePsychophysiologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJia, S., Li, H., Luo, Y., Chen, A., Wang, B., & Zhou, X. ( 2007 ). Detecting perceptual conflict by the feedback‐related negativity in brain potentials. NeuroReport, 18, 1385 – 1388. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282c48a90en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHajcak, G., Holroyd, C. B., Moser, J. S., & Simons, R. F. ( 2005 ). Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes. Psychophysiology, 42, 161 – 170. doi: 10.1111/j.1469‐8986. 2005.00278.xen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHajcak, G., Moser, J. S., Holroyd, C. B., & Simons, R. F. ( 2006 ). The feedback‐related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes. Biological Psychology, 71, 148 – 154. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.04.001en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHajcak, G., Moser, J. S., Holroyd, C. B., & Simons, R. F. ( 2007 ). It's worse than you thought: The feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks. Psychophysiology, 44, 905 – 912. doi: 10.1111/j.1469‐8986.2007.00567.xen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. ( 2002 ). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error‐related negativity. Psychological Review, 109, 679 – 709. doi: 10.1037/ 0033‐295X.109.4.679en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. ( 2008 ). Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex integrates reinforcement history to guide voluntary behaviour. Cortex, 44, 548 – 559. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.013en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolroyd, C. B., Hajcak, G., & Larsen, J. T. ( 2006 ). The good, the bad and the neutral: Electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli. Brain Research, 1105, 93 – 101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.015en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolroyd, C. B., Krigolson, O. E., Baker, R., Lee, S., & Gibson, J. ( 2009 ). When is an error not a prediction error? An electrophysiological investigation. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 59 – 70. doi: 10.3758/CABN.9.1.59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolroyd, C. B., Larsen, J. T., & Cohen, J. D. ( 2004 ). Context dependence of the event‐related brain potential associated with reward and punishment. Psychophysiology, 41, 245 – 253. doi: 10.1111/j.1469‐8986. 2004.00152.xen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolroyd, C. B., Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., & Cohen, J. D. ( 2003 ). Errors in reward prediction are reflected in the event‐related brain potential. NeuroReport, 14, 2481 – 2484. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000099601/41403.a5en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiu, Y., & Gehring, W. J. ( 2009 ). Loss feedback negativity elicited by single‐ versus conjoined‐feature stimuli. NeuroReport, 20, 632 – 636. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832a3250en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiltner, W. H., Braun, C. H., & Coles, M. G. ( 1997 ). Event‐related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time‐estimation task: Evidence for a “generic” neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 788 – 798. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.788en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiltner, W. H., Lemke, U., Weiss, T., Holroyd, C., Scheffers, M. K., & Coles, M. G. ( 2003 ). Implementation of error‐processing in the human anterior cingulate cortex: A source analysis of the magnetic equivalent of the error‐related negativity. Biological Psychology, 64, 157 – 166. doi: 10.1016/S0301‐0511(03)00107‐8en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNachev, P., Kennard, C., & Husain, M. ( 2008 ). Functional role of the supplementary and pre‐supplementary motor areas. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 856 – 869. doi: 10.1038/nrn2478en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNelson, L. D., Patrick, C. J., Collins, P., Lang, A. R., & Bernat, E. M. ( 2011 ). Alcohol impairs brain reactivity to explicit loss feedback in a gambling task. Psychopharmacology, 218, 419 – 428. doi: 10.1007/s00213‐011‐2323‐3en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNieuwenhuis, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Talsma, D., Coles, M. G., Holroyd, C. B., Kok, A., & van der Molen, M. W. ( 2002 ). A computational account of altered error processing in older age: Dopamine and the error‐related negativity. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 19 – 36. doi: 10.3758/CABN.2.1.19en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., Holroyd, C. B., Schurger, A., & Cohen, J. D. ( 2004 ). Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 741 – 747. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh034en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOliveira, F. T., McDonald, J. J., & Goodman. D. ( 2007 ). Performance monitoring in the anterior cingulate is not all error related: Expectancy deviation and the representation of action–outcome associations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1994 – 2004. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.1994en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePotts, G. F., Martin, L. E., Burton, P., & Montague, P. R. ( 2006 ). When things are better or worse than expected: The medial frontal cortex and the allocation of processing resources. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1112 – 1119. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1112en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRidderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A., & Nieuwenhuis, S. ( 2004 ). The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science, 306, 443 – 447. doi: 10.1126/science.1100301en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTreisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. ( 1980 ). Feature‐integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97 – 136. doi: 10.1016/0010‐0285(80)90005‐5en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVidal, F., Hasbroucq, T., Grapperon, J., & Bonnet, M. ( 2000 ). Is the “error negativity” specific to errors? Biological Psychology, 51, 109 – 128. doi: 10.1016/S0301‐0511(99)00032‐0en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYeung, N., Holroyd, C. B., & Cohen, J. D. ( 2005 ). ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 535 – 544. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh153en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYeung, N., & Sanfey, A. G. ( 2004 ). Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 6258 – 6264. doi: 10.1523/Jneurosci.4537‐03.2004en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlexander, W. H., & Brown, J. W. ( 2010 ). Computational models of performance monitoring and cognitive control. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 658 – 677. doi: 10.1111/j.1756‐8765.2010.01085.xen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlexander, W. H., & Brown, J. W. ( 2011 ). Medial prefrontal cortex as an action outcome predictor. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 1338 – 1344. doi: 10.1038/nn.2921en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernat, E. M., Nelson, L. D., Holroyd, C. B., Gehring, W. J., & Patrick, C. J. ( 2008 ). Separating cognitive processes with principal components analysis of EEG time‐frequency distributions. Proceedings of the Society of Photo‐Optical Instrumentation Engineers, 7074, 70740S.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernat, E. M., Nelson, L. D., Steele, V. R., Gehring, W. J., & Patrick, C. J. ( 2011 ). Externalizing psychopathology and gain/loss feedback in a simulated gambling task: Dissociable components of brain response revealed by time‐frequency analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 352 – 364. doi: 10.1037/a0022124en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernat, E. M., Williams, W. J., & Gehring, W. J. ( 2005 ). Decomposing ERP time‐frequency energy using PCA. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 1314 – 1334. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.01.019en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, J. D. ( 2008 ). Statistics corner. Questions and answers about language testing statistics: Effect size and eta squared. Shiken: JALT testing & evaluation. SIG Newsletter, 12, 38 – 43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCavanagh, J. F., Cohen, M. X., & Allen, J. J. ( 2009 ). Prelude to and resolution of an error: EEG phase synchrony reveals cognitive control dynamics during action monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 98 – 105. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4137‐08.2009en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDehaene, S., Posner, M. I., & Tucker, D. M. ( 1994 ). Localization of a neural system for error‐detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 5, 303 – 305. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‐9280en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. ( 1974 ). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143 – 149. doi: 10.3758/bf03203267en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFalkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., Hoormann, J., & Blanke, L. ( 1991 ). Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78, 447 – 455. doi: 10.1016/0013‐4694(91) 90062‐9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerdinand, N. K., Mecklinger, A., Kray, J., & Gehring, W. J. ( 2012 ). The processing of unexpected positive response outcomes in the mediofrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 12087 – 12092. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1410‐12.2012en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFolstein, J. R., & van Petten, C. V. ( 2008 ). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45, 152 – 170. doi: 10.1111/j.1469‐8986.2007.00602.xen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGehring, W. J., Goss, B., Coles, M. G. H., Meyer, D. E., & Donchin, E. ( 1993 ). A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 4, 385 – 390. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‐9280.1993.tb00586.xen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGehring, W. J., Liu, Y., Orr, J., & Carp, J. ( 2012 ). The error‐related negativity (ERN/Ne). In S. J. Luck & E. Kappenman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of event‐related components (pp. 231 – 291 ). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGehring, W. J., & Willoughby, A. R. ( 2002 ). The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science, 295, 2279 – 2282. doi: 10.1126/science.1066893en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGehring, W. J., & Willoughby, A. R. ( 2004 ). Are all medial frontal negativities created equal? Toward a richer empirical basis for theories of action monitoring. In M. Ullsperger & M. Falkenstein (Eds.), Errors, conflicts, and the brain. Current opinions on performance monitoring (pp. 14 – 20 ). Leipzig, Germany: Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. ( 1983 ). A new method for off‐line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468 – 484. doi: 10.1016/0013‐4694(83) 90135‐9en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
psyp12216.pdf
Size:
484.3KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.