Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback‐related negativity in the flanker gambling task
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Yanni | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nelson, Lindsay D. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bernat, Edward M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gehring, William J. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-08-06T16:49:36Z | |
dc.date.available | WITHHELD_13_MONTHS | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2014-08-06T16:49:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-08 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Liu, Yanni; Nelson, Lindsay D.; Bernat, Edward M.; Gehring, William J. (2014). "Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback‐related negativity in the flanker gambling task." Psychophysiology (8): 782-788. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0048-5772 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1469-8986 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/108013 | |
dc.description.abstract | A negative deflection in the event‐related potential is enhanced following error‐ and loss‐related feedback in decision‐making and simple gambling tasks. Researchers have assumed that the perceptual properties of the feedback stimuli are unimportant in explaining these effects. This assumption was tested in the present study through a flanker gambling task, in which the perceptual properties of the feedback were manipulated. Consistent with previous studies, loss elicited a larger feedback‐related negativity ( FRN ) than gain feedback. However, this FRN reward effect was modulated by the perceptual properties of the feedback stimuli. When gain and loss feedback were perceptually similar to each other, the enhancement of the FRN following the loss feedback was smaller compared to when the gain and loss feedback were different from each other. In addition, incongruent feedback elicited a larger FRN than congruent feedback; this FRN congruency effect was larger following gain than loss feedback. These results suggested that perceptual properties of the feedback stimuli play a role in the elicitation of the FRN . | en_US |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Flanker Task | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Perceptual Mismatch | en_US |
dc.subject.other | ERP | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Feedback‐Related Negativity | en_US |
dc.title | Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback‐related negativity in the flanker gambling task | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Physiology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108013/1/psyp12216.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/psyp.12216 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Psychophysiology | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Jia, S., Li, H., Luo, Y., Chen, A., Wang, B., & Zhou, X. ( 2007 ). Detecting perceptual conflict by the feedback‐related negativity in brain potentials. NeuroReport, 18, 1385 – 1388. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282c48a90 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hajcak, G., Holroyd, C. B., Moser, J. S., & Simons, R. F. ( 2005 ). Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes. Psychophysiology, 42, 161 – 170. doi: 10.1111/j.1469‐8986. 2005.00278.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hajcak, G., Moser, J. S., Holroyd, C. B., & Simons, R. F. ( 2006 ). The feedback‐related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes. Biological Psychology, 71, 148 – 154. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.04.001 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hajcak, G., Moser, J. S., Holroyd, C. B., & Simons, R. F. ( 2007 ). It's worse than you thought: The feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks. Psychophysiology, 44, 905 – 912. doi: 10.1111/j.1469‐8986.2007.00567.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. ( 2002 ). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error‐related negativity. Psychological Review, 109, 679 – 709. doi: 10.1037/ 0033‐295X.109.4.679 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. ( 2008 ). Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex integrates reinforcement history to guide voluntary behaviour. Cortex, 44, 548 – 559. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.013 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Holroyd, C. B., Hajcak, G., & Larsen, J. T. ( 2006 ). The good, the bad and the neutral: Electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli. Brain Research, 1105, 93 – 101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.015 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Holroyd, C. B., Krigolson, O. E., Baker, R., Lee, S., & Gibson, J. ( 2009 ). When is an error not a prediction error? An electrophysiological investigation. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 59 – 70. doi: 10.3758/CABN.9.1.59. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Holroyd, C. B., Larsen, J. T., & Cohen, J. D. ( 2004 ). Context dependence of the event‐related brain potential associated with reward and punishment. Psychophysiology, 41, 245 – 253. doi: 10.1111/j.1469‐8986. 2004.00152.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Holroyd, C. B., Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., & Cohen, J. D. ( 2003 ). Errors in reward prediction are reflected in the event‐related brain potential. NeuroReport, 14, 2481 – 2484. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000099601/41403.a5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Liu, Y., & Gehring, W. J. ( 2009 ). Loss feedback negativity elicited by single‐ versus conjoined‐feature stimuli. NeuroReport, 20, 632 – 636. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832a3250 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Miltner, W. H., Braun, C. H., & Coles, M. G. ( 1997 ). Event‐related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time‐estimation task: Evidence for a “generic” neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 788 – 798. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.788 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Miltner, W. H., Lemke, U., Weiss, T., Holroyd, C., Scheffers, M. K., & Coles, M. G. ( 2003 ). Implementation of error‐processing in the human anterior cingulate cortex: A source analysis of the magnetic equivalent of the error‐related negativity. Biological Psychology, 64, 157 – 166. doi: 10.1016/S0301‐0511(03)00107‐8 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nachev, P., Kennard, C., & Husain, M. ( 2008 ). Functional role of the supplementary and pre‐supplementary motor areas. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 856 – 869. doi: 10.1038/nrn2478 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nelson, L. D., Patrick, C. J., Collins, P., Lang, A. R., & Bernat, E. M. ( 2011 ). Alcohol impairs brain reactivity to explicit loss feedback in a gambling task. Psychopharmacology, 218, 419 – 428. doi: 10.1007/s00213‐011‐2323‐3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nieuwenhuis, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Talsma, D., Coles, M. G., Holroyd, C. B., Kok, A., & van der Molen, M. W. ( 2002 ). A computational account of altered error processing in older age: Dopamine and the error‐related negativity. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 19 – 36. doi: 10.3758/CABN.2.1.19 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., Holroyd, C. B., Schurger, A., & Cohen, J. D. ( 2004 ). Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 741 – 747. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh034 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Oliveira, F. T., McDonald, J. J., & Goodman. D. ( 2007 ). Performance monitoring in the anterior cingulate is not all error related: Expectancy deviation and the representation of action–outcome associations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1994 – 2004. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.1994 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Potts, G. F., Martin, L. E., Burton, P., & Montague, P. R. ( 2006 ). When things are better or worse than expected: The medial frontal cortex and the allocation of processing resources. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1112 – 1119. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1112 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A., & Nieuwenhuis, S. ( 2004 ). The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science, 306, 443 – 447. doi: 10.1126/science.1100301 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. ( 1980 ). Feature‐integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97 – 136. doi: 10.1016/0010‐0285(80)90005‐5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Vidal, F., Hasbroucq, T., Grapperon, J., & Bonnet, M. ( 2000 ). Is the “error negativity” specific to errors? Biological Psychology, 51, 109 – 128. doi: 10.1016/S0301‐0511(99)00032‐0 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Yeung, N., Holroyd, C. B., & Cohen, J. D. ( 2005 ). ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 535 – 544. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh153 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Yeung, N., & Sanfey, A. G. ( 2004 ). Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 6258 – 6264. doi: 10.1523/Jneurosci.4537‐03.2004 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Alexander, W. H., & Brown, J. W. ( 2010 ). Computational models of performance monitoring and cognitive control. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 658 – 677. doi: 10.1111/j.1756‐8765.2010.01085.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Alexander, W. H., & Brown, J. W. ( 2011 ). Medial prefrontal cortex as an action outcome predictor. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 1338 – 1344. doi: 10.1038/nn.2921 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bernat, E. M., Nelson, L. D., Holroyd, C. B., Gehring, W. J., & Patrick, C. J. ( 2008 ). Separating cognitive processes with principal components analysis of EEG time‐frequency distributions. Proceedings of the Society of Photo‐Optical Instrumentation Engineers, 7074, 70740S. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bernat, E. M., Nelson, L. D., Steele, V. R., Gehring, W. J., & Patrick, C. J. ( 2011 ). Externalizing psychopathology and gain/loss feedback in a simulated gambling task: Dissociable components of brain response revealed by time‐frequency analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 352 – 364. doi: 10.1037/a0022124 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bernat, E. M., Williams, W. J., & Gehring, W. J. ( 2005 ). Decomposing ERP time‐frequency energy using PCA. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 1314 – 1334. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.01.019 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Brown, J. D. ( 2008 ). Statistics corner. Questions and answers about language testing statistics: Effect size and eta squared. Shiken: JALT testing & evaluation. SIG Newsletter, 12, 38 – 43. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cavanagh, J. F., Cohen, M. X., & Allen, J. J. ( 2009 ). Prelude to and resolution of an error: EEG phase synchrony reveals cognitive control dynamics during action monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 98 – 105. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4137‐08.2009 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dehaene, S., Posner, M. I., & Tucker, D. M. ( 1994 ). Localization of a neural system for error‐detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 5, 303 – 305. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‐9280 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. ( 1974 ). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143 – 149. doi: 10.3758/bf03203267 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., Hoormann, J., & Blanke, L. ( 1991 ). Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78, 447 – 455. doi: 10.1016/0013‐4694(91) 90062‐9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ferdinand, N. K., Mecklinger, A., Kray, J., & Gehring, W. J. ( 2012 ). The processing of unexpected positive response outcomes in the mediofrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 12087 – 12092. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1410‐12.2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Folstein, J. R., & van Petten, C. V. ( 2008 ). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45, 152 – 170. doi: 10.1111/j.1469‐8986.2007.00602.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gehring, W. J., Goss, B., Coles, M. G. H., Meyer, D. E., & Donchin, E. ( 1993 ). A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 4, 385 – 390. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‐9280.1993.tb00586.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gehring, W. J., Liu, Y., Orr, J., & Carp, J. ( 2012 ). The error‐related negativity (ERN/Ne). In S. J. Luck & E. Kappenman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of event‐related components (pp. 231 – 291 ). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gehring, W. J., & Willoughby, A. R. ( 2002 ). The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science, 295, 2279 – 2282. doi: 10.1126/science.1066893 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gehring, W. J., & Willoughby, A. R. ( 2004 ). Are all medial frontal negativities created equal? Toward a richer empirical basis for theories of action monitoring. In M. Ullsperger & M. Falkenstein (Eds.), Errors, conflicts, and the brain. Current opinions on performance monitoring (pp. 14 – 20 ). Leipzig, Germany: Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. ( 1983 ). A new method for off‐line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468 – 484. doi: 10.1016/0013‐4694(83) 90135‐9 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.