Show simple item record

Medication safety after implementation of a commercial electronic health record system in five safety‐net practices: A mixed methods approach

dc.contributor.authorPohl, Joanne M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTanner, Clareen_US
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, Andrewen_US
dc.contributor.authorKaleba, Erin O.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRachman, Fred D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Joanneen_US
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Kaien_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-06T16:49:37Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHSen_US
dc.date.available2014-08-06T16:49:37Z
dc.date.issued2014-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationPohl, Joanne M.; Tanner, Clare; Hamilton, Andrew; Kaleba, Erin O.; Rachman, Fred D.; White, Joanne; Zheng, Kai (2014). "Medication safety after implementation of a commercial electronic health record system in five safety‐net practices: A mixed methods approach." Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners 26(8): 438-444.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2327-6886en_US
dc.identifier.issn2327-6924en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/108016
dc.description.abstractPurpose This study, conducted in five safety‐net practices, including two nurse‐managed health centers (NMHCs) and three federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), examined the impact of implementing a commercial electronic health records (EHRs) system on medication safety. Data source A mixed methods approach with two sources of data were used: (a) a query of prescription records captured by the EHR retrieving co‐prescribed medications with identified drug–drug interaction (DDI) risks, and (b) semistructured interviews with clinicians and leadership about the usability and benefits of EHR‐embedded clinical decision support in the form of DDI alerts. Conclusions We found an exceptionally low rate of DDI pairs in all five practices. Only 130 “true” DDI pairs were confirmed representing 149,087 visits and 62 providers. Among the 130, the largest categories were related to antihypertensive medications, which are in fact often prescribed together. There were no significant differences between physicians and nurse practitioners on the rate of DDI pairs nor between NMHCs and FQHCs. Implications for practice Implementation of an EHR in these five safety‐net settings had a positive impact on medication safety. The issue of missing end dates is noteworthy in terms of DDIs and unnecessary alerts that could lead to alert fatigue.en_US
dc.publisherSageen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherSafetyen_US
dc.subject.otherQualitativeen_US
dc.subject.otherPrimary Careen_US
dc.subject.otherInformation Technologyen_US
dc.subject.otherMedicationsen_US
dc.subject.otherUnderserveden_US
dc.titleMedication safety after implementation of a commercial electronic health record system in five safety‐net practices: A mixed methods approachen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNursingen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108016/1/jaan12089.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/2327-6924.12089en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of the American Association of Nurse Practitionersen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS). ( 2007 ). Medicare Part D plan rating—Quality and performance measures: DMD07 drug‐drug interactions. Retrieved from https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality‐Initiatives‐Patient‐Assessment‐Instruments/QualityMeasures/index.html.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlumenthal, D., & Tavenner, M. ( 2010 ) The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. New England Journal of Medicine, 363 ( 6 ), 501 – 504. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006114en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbramson, E. L., Bates, D. W., Jenter, C., Volk, L. A., Barron, Y., Quaresimo, J., … Kaushal, R. ( 2012 ). Ambulatory prescribing errors among community‐based providers in two states. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19 ( 4 ), 644 – 648. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl‐2011‐000345en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWessel, A. M., Litvin, C., Jenkins, R. G., Nietert, P. J., Nemeth, L. S., & Ornstein, S. M. ( 2010 ). Medication prescribing and monitoring errors in primary care: A report from the Practice Partner Research Network. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19 ( 5 ), 1 – 5. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.034678en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang, C. J., Patel, M. H., Schueth, A. J., Bradley, M., Wu, S., Crosson, J., … Bell, D. S. ( 2009 ). Perceptions of standards‐based electronic prescribing systems as implemented in outpatient primary care: A physician survey. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16 ( 4 ), 493 – 502. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2998en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan der Sijs, H., Aarts, J., Vulto, A., & Berg, M. ( 2006 ). Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13 ( 2 ), 138 – 147. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1809en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSia, C., Tonniges, T. F., Osterhus, E., & Taba, S. ( 2004 ). History of the medical home concept. Pediatrics, 113 ( 5 Suppl. ), 1473 – 1478.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShields, A. E., Shin, P., Leu, M. G., Levy, D. E., Betancourt, R. M., Hawkins, D., & Proser, M. ( 2007 ). Adoption of health information technology in community health centers: Results of a national survey. Health Affairs, 26 ( 5 ), 1373 – 1383. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.1373en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrrico, K. B. ( 2008 ). Sources and types of discrepancies between electronic medical records and actual outpatient medication use. Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy, 14 ( 7 ), 626 – 631.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNemeth, L. S., & Wessell, A. M. ( 2010 ). Improving medication safety in primary care using electronic health records. Journal of Patient Safety, 6 ( 4 ), 238 – 243. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3181fe401fen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNanji, K. C., Rothschild, J. M., Salzberg, C., Keohane, C. A., Zigmont, K., Devita, J., … Poon, E. G. ( 2011 ). Errors associated with outpatient computerized prescribing systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18 ( 6 ), 767 – 773. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl‐2011‐000205en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuo, G. M., Phillips, R. L., Graham, D., & Hickner, J. M. ( 2008 ). Medication errors reported by U.S. family physicians and their office staff. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 17 ( 4 ), 286 – 290. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024869en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaushal, R., Shojania, K. G., & Bates, D. W. ( 2003 ). Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems in medication safety. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163 ( 12 ), 1409 – 1416. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.12.1409en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsaac, T., Weissman, J. S., Davis, R. B., Massagli, M., Cyrulik, A., Sands, D. Z., … Weingart, S. N. ( 2009 ). Overrides of medication alerts in ambulatory care. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169 ( 3 ), 305 – 311. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.551en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInstitute of Medicine (IOM). ( 2006 ). Preventing medication errors: Quality chasm series. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInstitute of Medicine (IOM). ( 2000 ). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. ( 1967 ). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDennehy, P., White, M., Hamilton, A., Pohl, J. M., Tanner, C., Onifade, T. J., & Zheng, K. ( 2011 ). A partnership model for implementing electronic health records in resource‐limited primary care settings: Experiences from two nurse managed health centers. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18, 820 – 826.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCharmaz, K. ( 2006 ). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.