Computational complexity of finding Pareto efficient outcomes for biobjective lot‐sizing models
dc.contributor.author | Romeijn, H. Edwin | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Morales, Dolores Romero | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Heuvel, Wilco | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-08-06T16:49:49Z | |
dc.date.available | WITHHELD_13_MONTHS | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2014-08-06T16:49:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-08 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Romeijn, H. Edwin; Morales, Dolores Romero; Heuvel, Wilco (2014). "Computational complexity of finding Pareto efficient outcomes for biobjective lot‐sizing models." Naval Research Logistics (NRL) 61(5): 386-402. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0894-069X | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1520-6750 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/108049 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this article, we study a biobjective economic lot‐sizing problem with applications, among others, in green logistics. The first objective aims to minimize the total lot‐sizing costs including production and inventory holding costs, whereas the second one minimizes the maximum production and inventory block expenditure. We derive (almost) tight complexity results for the Pareto efficient outcome problem under nonspeculative lot‐sizing costs. First, we identify nontrivial problem classes for which this problem is polynomially solvable. Second, if we relax any of the parameter assumptions, we show that (except for one case) finding a single Pareto efficient outcome is an N P ‐hard task in general. Finally, we shed some light on the task of describing the Pareto frontier. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 61: 386–402, 2014 | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Freeman and Company | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Biobjective | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Expenditure | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Pareto Efficient Outcomes | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Complexity Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Lot‐Sizing | en_US |
dc.title | Computational complexity of finding Pareto efficient outcomes for biobjective lot‐sizing models | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Statistics (Mathematical) | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108049/1/nav21590.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/nav.21590 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Naval Research Logistics (NRL) | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | M.J. Retel Helmrich, R. Jans, W. van den Heuvel, and A.P.M. Wagelmans, The economic lot‐sizing problem with an emission constraint, Forthcoming in Eur J Oper Res, ( 2014 ). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | C. S. Chung and C. H. M. Lin, An O( T 2 ) algorithm for the NI/G/NI/ND capacitated lot size problem, Manag Sci 34 ( 1988 ), 420 – 426. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | M. Ehrgott and X. Gandibleux, A survey and annotated bibliography of multiobjective combinatorial optimization, OR Spektrum 22 ( 2000 ), 425 – 460. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | M. Ehrgott and X. Gandibleux, Approximative solution methods for multiobjective combinatorial optimization, TOP, 12 ( 1 ) ( 2004 ), 1 – 89. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | A. Federgruen and J. Meissner, Competition under time‐varying demands and dynamic lot‐sizing costs, Nav Res Log 56 ( 1 ) ( 2009 ), 57 – 73. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | A. Federgruen and M. Tzur, A simple forward algorithm to solve general dynamic lot sizing models with n periods in O ( n log n ) or O ( n ) time, Manag Sci 37 ( 1991 ), 909 – 925. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | M. Florian and M. Klein, Deterministic procurement planning with concave costs and capacity constraints, Manag Sci 18 ( 1971 ), 12 – 20. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | M. Florian, J.K. Lenstra, and A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan, Deterministic production planning: algorithms and complexity, Manag Sci 26 ( 1980 ), 669 – 679. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | M.R. Garey and D.S. Johnson, Computers and intractability: A guide to the theory of NP‐completeness, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1979. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | S. M. Gilbert, Coordination of pricing and multiple‐period production for constant priced goods, Eur J Oper Res 114 ( 1999 ), 330 – 337. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | F. Love, Bounded production and inventory models with piecewise concave costs, Manag Sci 20 ( 1973 ), 313 – 318. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | S. Mittal and A.S. Schulz, A general framework for designing approximation schemes for combinatorial optimization problems with many objectives combined into one, Oper Res 61 ( 2 ) ( 2013 ), 386 – 397. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | C.H. Papadimitriou and M. Yannakakis, “On the approximability of trade‐offs and optimal access of web sources,” In: Proceedings of 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Los Alamitos, California, 2000, pp. 86–92. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | T. Stidsen, K.A. Andersen, and B. Dammann, A branch and bound algorithm for a class of biobjective mixed integer programs, Manag Sci 60 ( 4 ) ( 2014 ), 1009 – 1032. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | E. Toczylowski, “An O ( T 2 ) algorithm for the lot‐sizing problem with limited inventory levels,” in: IEEE Symposium on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation, Vol. 3, Los Alamitos, California, 1995, pp. 78–85. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | E.L. Ulungu and J. Teghem, Multi‐objective combinatorial optimization problems: a survey, J Multi‐Criteria Decis Anal 3 ( 1994 ), 83 – 104. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | C.P.M. van Hoesel and A.P.M. Wagelmans, An O ( T 3 ) algorithm for the economic lot‐sizing problem with constant capacities, Manag Sci 42 ( 1996 ), 142 – 150. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | C.P.M. van Hoesel and A.P.M. Wagelmans, Parametric analysis of setup cost in the economic lot‐sizing model without speculative motives, Int J Prod Econ 66 ( 2000 ), 13 – 22. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | J.C. Velázquez‐Martínez, J.C. Fransoo, E.E. Blanco, and J. Mora‐Vargas, The impact of carbon footprinting aggregation on realizing emission reduction targets, Flex Serv Manuf J 26 ( 1–2 ) ( 2014 ), 196 – 220. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | A.P.M. Wagelmans, C.P.M. van Hoesel, and A. Kolen, Economic lot sizing: An O ( n log n ) algorithm that runs in linear time in the Wagner‐Whitin case, Oper Res 40 ( 1992 ), S145 – S156. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | H.M. Wagner and T.M. Whitin, Dynamic version of the economic lot size model, Manag Sci 5 ( 1958 ), 89 – 96. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | L.A. Wolsey, Lot‐sizing with production and delivery time windows, Math Program Ser A 107 ( 2006 ), 471 – 489. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | W.I. Zangwill, Minimum concave cost flows in certain networks, Manag Sci 14 ( 1968 ), 249 – 265. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | N. Absi, S. Dauzère‐Pérès, S. Kedad‐Sidhoum, B. Penz, and C. Rapine, Lot‐sizing with carbon emission constraints, Eur J Oper Res 227 ( 1 ) ( 2013 ), 55 – 61. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | A. Aggarwal and J. K. Park, Improved algorithms for economic lot‐size problems, Oper Res 14 ( 1993 ), 549 – 571. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | S. Benjaafar, Y. Li, and M. Daskin, Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: Insights from simple models, IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 10 ( 1 ) ( 2013 ), 99 – 116. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | G. R. Bitran and H. H. Yanasse, Computational complexity of the capacitated lot size problem, Manag Sci 28 ( 1982 ), 1174 – 1186. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | R. Blanquero and E. Carrizosa, A D.C. biobjective location model, J Global Optim 23 ( 2002 ), 139 – 154. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Y. Bouchery, A. Ghaffari, Z. Jemai, and Y. Dallery, Including sustainability criteria into inventory models, Eur J Oper Res 222 ( 2 ) ( 2012 ), 229 – 240. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.