Medical Student Milestones in Emergency Medicine
dc.contributor.author | Santen, Sally A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Peterson, William J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Khandelwal, Sorabh | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | House, Joseph B. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Manthey, David E. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sozener, Cemal B. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-09-03T16:51:20Z | |
dc.date.available | WITHHELD_12_MONTHS | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2014-09-03T16:51:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-08 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Santen, Sally A.; Peterson, William J.; Khandelwal, Sorabh; House, Joseph B.; Manthey, David E.; Sozener, Cemal B. (2014). "Medical Student Milestones in Emergency Medicine." Academic Emergency Medicine 21(8): 905-911. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1069-6563 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1553-2712 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/108261 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives Medical education is a continuum from medical school through residency to unsupervised clinical practice. There has been a movement toward competency‐based medical education prompted by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education ( ACGME ) using milestones to assess competence. While implementation of milestones for residents sets specific standards for transition to internship, there exists a need for the development of competency‐based instruments to assess medical students as they progress toward internship. The objective of this study was to develop competency‐based milestones for fourth‐year medical students completing their emergency medicine ( EM ) clerkships (regardless of whether the students were planning on entering EM ) using a rigorous method to attain validity evidence. Methods A literature review was performed to develop a list of potential milestones. An expert panel, which included a medical student and 23 faculty members (four program directors, 16 clerkship directors, and five assistant deans) from 19 different institutions, came to consensus on these milestones through two rounds of a modified Delphi protocol. The Delphi technique builds content validity and is an accepted method to develop consensus by eliciting expert opinions through multiple rounds of questionnaires. Results Of the initial 39 milestones, 12 were removed at the end of round 1 due to low agreement on importance of the milestone or because of redundancy with other milestones. An additional 12 milestones were revised to improve clarity or eliminate redundancy, and one was added based on expert panelists' suggestions. Of the 28 milestones moving to round 2, consensus with a high level of agreement was achieved for 24. These were mapped to the ACGME EM residency milestone competency domains, as well as the Association of American Medical Colleges ( AAMC ) core entrustable professional activities for entering residency to improve content validity. Conclusions This study found consensus support by experts for a list of 24 milestones relevant to the assessment of fourth‐year medical student performance by the completion of their EM clerkships. The findings are useful for development of a valid method for assessing medical student performance as students approach residency. Resumen Objetivos La formación médica es un continuo que va desde la universidad, pasando por la residencia, hasta la práctica clínica no supervisada. Ha habido un movimiento hacia la formación médica basada en la adquisición de competencias promovido por el Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education ( ACGME ) mediante los hitos para evaluar la competencia. Mientras la implementación de los hitos para los residentes establece normas específicas para la transición a residente, existe necesidad de desarrollar instrumentos basados en la competencia para evaluar a los estudiantes de medicina según progresan hacia la residencia. El objetivo de este estudio fue desarrollar los hitos basados en competencias para los estudiantes de medicina de cuarto año al completar sus prácticas clínicas en Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias ( MUE ) (indistintamente si el estudiante planeaba acceder a la MUE ) utilizando un método riguroso para lograr evidencia válida. Metodología Se realizó una revisión de la literatura para desarrollar una lista de hitos potenciales. Un panel de expertos, que incluyó 23 profesores de la facultad cuyas responsabilidades eran directores de programa (4), directores de prácticas clínicas (16), vicedecanos (5) y un estudiante de medicina de 19 instituciones diferentes, llegaron a un consenso sobre estos hitos a través de 2 rondas del protocolo de Delphi modificado. La técnica Delphi construye un contenido válido y es un método aceptado para desarrollar un consenso mediante la obtención de opiniones de expertos a través de múltiples rondas de preguntas. Resultados De los 39 hitos iniciales, se eliminaron 12 al final de la primera ronda debido al bajo acuerdo sobre la importancia del hito o debido a su redundancia con otros hitos. Se revisaron 12 hitos adicionales para mejorar la claridad o eliminar la redundancia, y se añadió uno basado en las sugerencias del panel de expertos. De los 28 hitos que llegaron a la segunda ronda, se alcanzó un consenso con un alto nivel de acuerdo para 24 de los hitos. Estos hitos se esquematizaron a los dominios de competencia de los hitos de la residencia de MUE del ACGME , así como a las actividades profesionales recomendadas para acceder a la residencia de la Association of American Medical Colleges ( AAMC ) para mejorar la validez de contenido. Conclusiones Este estudio llegó a un consenso apoyado por expertos para una lista de 24 hitos relevantes para evaluar el rendimiento de los estudiantes de medicina de cuarto año al finalizar su práctica clínica en MUE . Los hallazgos son útiles para el desarrollo de un método válido para evaluar el rendimiento de los estudiantes de medicina a medida que éstos se acercan a la residencia. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Addison‐Wesley Publishing Company | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.title | Medical Student Milestones in Emergency Medicine | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Medicine (General) | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108261/1/acem12443-sup-0002-DataSupplementS2.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108261/2/acem12443.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108261/3/acem12443-sup-0001-DataSupplementS1.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/acem.12443 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Academic Emergency Medicine | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Clerkship Directors in Emergency Medicine. Emergency Medicine Clerkship Primer. Available at: http://www.saem.org/docs/students/em-clerkship-primer_0_0.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed May 8, 2014. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | LaMantia J. The ACGME core competencies: getting ahead of the curve. Acad Emerg Med 2002; 9: 1216 – 7. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T, Flynn TC. The next GME accreditation system‐rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1051 – 6. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Beeson MS, Carter WA, Christopher TA, et al. The development of the emergency medicine milestones. Acad Emerg Med 2013; 20: 724 – 9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Academic Board of Emergency Medicine. Emergency Medicine Milestones. Available at: https://www.abem.org/public/publications/emergency-medicine-milestones. Accessed May 8, 2014. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Korte RC, Beeson MS, Russ CM. Carter WA; Emergency Medicine Milestones Working Group, Reisdorff EJ. The emergency medicine milestones: a validation study. Acad Emerg Med 2013; 20: 730 – 6. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Association of American Medical Colleges Drafting Panel. Core Entrustable Physician Activities for Entering Residency (UPDATED). Available at: http://www.mededportal.org/icollaborative/resource/887. Accessed May 8, 2014. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hauer KE, Kohlwes J, Cornett P, et al. Identifying entrustable professional activities in internal medicine training. J Grad Med Educ 2013; 5: 54 – 9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wijnen‐Meijer M, Van der Schaaf M, Nillesen K, Harendza S, ten Cate O. Essential facets of competence that enable trust in graduates: a Delphi study among physician educators in the Netherlands. J Grad Med Educ 2013; 5: 46 – 53. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Linstone HA, Turoff M, eds. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. London, UK: Addison‐Wesley Publishing Company, 1977. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Landeta J. Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2006; 73: 467 – 82. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Internal Medicine Core Competencies. Available at: https://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/2013-PR-FAQ-PIF/140_internal_medicine_07012013.pdf. Accessed May 8, 2014. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. The Pediatric Milestones Project: Pediatrics Core Competencies. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramResources/320_PedsMilestonesProject.pdf. Accessed May 8, 2014. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Manthey DE, Coates WC, Ander DS, et al. Report of the task force on national fourth year medical student emergency medicine curriculum guide. Ann Emerg Med 2006; 47: E1 – 7. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | De Loe RC. Exploring complex policy questions using policy Delphi: a multi‐round, interactive survey method. Appl Geogr 1995; 15: 53 – 68. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dekker‐Groen AM, Van der Schaaf MF, Stokking KM. Teacher competences required for developing reflection skills of nursing students. J Adv Nursing 2011; 67: 1568 – 79. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Van der Schaaf MF, Stokking KM. Construct validation of content standards for teaching. Scan J Educ Res 2011; 55: 273 – 89. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wijnen‐Meijer M, Van der Schaaf M, Nillesen K, Harendza S, ten Cate O. Essential Facets of Competence That Enable Trust in Graduates: A Delphi Study Among Physician Educators in the Netherlands [Supplemental Appendix]. Available at: www.jgme.org/doi/suppl/10.4300/JGME-D-11-00324.1/suppl_file/wijnen-meijer.1.suppl.doc. Accessed May 8, 2014. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Downing SM, Haladyna TM. Validity and its threats. in: Downing SM, Yudowsky R, eds. Assessment in Health Professions Education. New York, NY: Routledge, 2009. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Santen SA, Rademacher N, Heron SL, Khandelwal S, Hauff S, Hopson L. How competent are emergency medicine interns for level 1 milestones: who is responsible? Acad Emerg Med 2013; 20: 736 – 9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Khandelwal S, Way DP, Wald DA, et al. State of undergraduate education in emergency medicine: a national survey of clerkship directors. Acad Emerg Med 2014; 21: 92 – 5. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Emergency Medicine Core Competencies. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PDFs/FAQ/110_emergency_medicine_FAQs_07012013.pdf. Accessed May 8, 2014. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Van der Vleuten CP. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ 1996; 1: 41 – 67. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 387 – 96. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Swing SR. The ACGME outcome project: retrospective and prospective. Med Teach 2007; 29: 648 – 54. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Frank JR, Danoff D. The CanMEDS initiative: implementing an outcomes‐based framework of physician competencies. Med Teach 2007; 29: 642 – 7. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.