Show simple item record

Heart Rhythm Society Members’ Views on Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillator Reuse

dc.contributor.authorHughey, Andrew B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDesai, Nimiten_US
dc.contributor.authorBaman, Timir S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGakenheimer, Lindseyen_US
dc.contributor.authorHagan, Lindsayen_US
dc.contributor.authorKirkpatrick, James N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOral, Hakanen_US
dc.contributor.authorEagle, Kim A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCrawford, Thomas C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-03T16:51:35Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_12_MONTHSen_US
dc.date.available2014-09-03T16:51:35Z
dc.date.issued2014-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationHughey, Andrew B. ; Desai, Nimit ; Baman, Timir S. ; Gakenheimer, Lindsey ; Hagan, Lindsay ; Kirkpatrick, James N. ; Oral, Hakan ; Eagle, Kim A. ; Crawford, Thomas C. (2014). "Heart Rhythm Society Membersâ Views on Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverterâ Defibrillator Reuse." Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 37(8): 969-977.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0147-8389en_US
dc.identifier.issn1540-8159en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/108288
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherOpinionsen_US
dc.subject.otherViewsen_US
dc.subject.otherReuseen_US
dc.subject.otherReutilizationen_US
dc.subject.otherDefibrillation–ICDen_US
dc.subject.otherPacingen_US
dc.titleHeart Rhythm Society Members’ Views on Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillator Reuseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108288/1/pace12418.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/pace.12418en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePacing and Clinical Electrophysiologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGakenheimer L, Lange DC, Romero J, Kirkpatrick JN, Sovitch P, Oral H, Eagle KA, et al. Societal views of pacemaker reutilization for those with untreated symptomatic bradycardia in underserved nations. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2011; 30: 261 – 266.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGroeneveld PW, Matta MA, Suh JJ, Heidenreich PA, Shea JA. Costs and quality‐of‐life effects of implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators. Am J Cardiol 2006; 98: 1409 – 1415.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKirkpatrick JN, Papini C, Baman TS, Kota K, Eagle KA, Verdino RJ, Caplan AL. Reuse of pacemakers and defibrillators in developing countries: Logistical, legal, and ethical barriers and solutions. Heart Rhythm 2010; 7: 1623 – 1627.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe World Bank. Country and Lending Groups. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/about/country‐classifications/country‐and‐lending‐groups. Accessed Oct 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAragam KG, Baman TS, Kirkpatrick JN, Goldman EB, Brown AC, Crawford T, Oral H, et al. The ethics of pacemaker reuse: Might the best be the enemy of the good? Heart 2011; 97: 2005 – 2006.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNava S, Morales JL, Marquez MF, Barrera F, Gomez J, Colin L, Brugada J, et al. Reuse of pacemakers: Comparison of short and long‐term performance. Circulation. 2013; 127: 1177 – 1183.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePavri BB, Lokhandwala Y, Kulkarni GV, Shah M, Kantharia BK, Mascarenhas DA. Reuse of explanted, resterilized implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators: A cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157: 542 – 548.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVegso J, Membership Director, HRS, October 29, 2013, Personal Communication.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKellerman SE, Herold J. Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature. Am J Prev Med 2001; 20: 61 – 67.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceXu W, Moore HJ, Karasik PE, Franz MR, Singh SN, Fletcher RD. Management strategies when implanted cardioverter defibrillator leads fail: Survey findings. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2009; 32: 1130 – 1141.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeering TF, Clair WK, Delaughter MC, Fisher WG, Garlitski AC, Wilkoff BL, Gillis AM. A Heart Rhythm Society Electrophysiology Workforce study: Current survey analysis of physician workforce trends. Heart Rhythm 2010; 7: 1346 – 1355.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSears SF, Todaro JF, Urizar G, Lewis TS, Sirois B, Wallace R, Sotile W, et al. Assessing the psychosocial impact of the ICD: A national survey of implantable cardioverter defibrillator health care providers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000; 23: 939 – 945.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMond HG, Proclemer A. The 11th world survey of cardiac pacing and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators: Calendar year 2009–a World Society of Arrhythmia's project. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2011; 34: 1013 – 1027.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRyden L. Re‐use of devices in cardiology. Proceedings from a Policy Conference at the European Heart House, 5–6 February, 1998. Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 1628 – 1631.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMugica J, Duconge R, Henry L. Survival and mortality in 3,701 pacemaker patients: Arguments in favor of pacemaker reuse. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1986; 9: 1282 – 1287.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaman TS, Romero A, Kirkpatrick JN, Romero J, Lange DC, Sison EO, Tangco RV, et al. Safety and efficacy of pacemaker reuse in underdeveloped nations: A case series. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 1557 – 1558.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaman TS, Meier P, Romero J, Gakenheimer L, Kirkpatrick JN, Sovitch P, Oral H, et al. Safety of pacemaker reuse: A meta‐analysis with implications for underserved nations. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2011; 4: 318 – 323.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaman TS, Eagle KA. Cardiac device reutilization: Is it time to “go green” in underserved countries? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2011; 34: 651 – 652.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFDA Compliance Policy Guides, CPG Sec. 310.100 Pacemaker Reuse: http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/ComplianceManuals/CompliancePolicyGuidanceManual/ucm073891.htm (accessed November 2013).en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.