The Michigan incontinence symptom index (M‐ISI): A clinical measure for type, severity, and bother related to urinary incontinence
dc.contributor.author | Suskind, Anne M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dunn, Rodney L. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Morgan, Daniel M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | DeLancey, John O.L. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | McGuire, Edward J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wei, John T. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-09-03T16:51:53Z | |
dc.date.available | WITHHELD_13_MONTHS | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2014-09-03T16:51:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-09 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Suskind, Anne M.; Dunn, Rodney L.; Morgan, Daniel M.; DeLancey, John O.L.; McGuire, Edward J.; Wei, John T. (2014). "The Michigan incontinence symptom index (M‐ISI): A clinical measure for type, severity, and bother related to urinary incontinence." Neurourology and Urodynamics 33(7): 1128-1134. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0733-2467 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1520-6777 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/108319 | |
dc.description.abstract | Aims To develop a clinically relevant, easy to use, and validated instrument for assessing severity and bother related to urinary incontinence. Methods Survey items were piloted and refined following psychometric principles in five separate patient cohorts. Patient and expert endorsement of items, factor analyses, Spearman rank correlations and response distributions were employed for item selection. Formal reliability and validity evaluation were conducted for the final questionnaire items. Results Expert physicians and patient focus groups confirmed face and content validity for the measure. A 10‐item measure called the Michigan Incontinence Symptom Index (M‐ISI) was developed with two domains: a Total M‐ISI Domain consisting of subdomains for stress urinary incontinence, urgency urinary incontinence, and pad use, and a Bother Domain. High construct validity was demonstrated with a Cronbach's alpha for the Total M‐ISI Domain (items 1‐8) of 0.90 and for the Bother Domain (items 9‐10) of 0.82. Cronbach's alpha for the subdomains were all > 0.85. Construct validity, convergent and divergent validity, internal discriminant validity, and predictive validity were all robust. The minimally important difference for the measure was determined to be 4 points (out of 32) for the Total M‐ISI Severity Domain, and 1‐2 points (out of 8‐12) for the individual subdomains. Conclusions The M‐ISI is a parsimonious measure that has established reliability and validity on several levels and complements current clinical evaluative methods for patients with urinary incontinence. Neurourol. Urodynam. 33:1128–1134, 2014 . © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Quality of Life | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Urge Urinary Incontinence | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Stress Urinary Incontinence | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Bother | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Impact | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Pad Use | en_US |
dc.title | The Michigan incontinence symptom index (M‐ISI): A clinical measure for type, severity, and bother related to urinary incontinence | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Internal Medicine and Specialties | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108319/1/nau22468.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/nau.22468 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Neurourology and Urodynamics | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Stoffel JT, Morgan D, Dunn R, Hsu Y, Fenner D, Delancey J, et al. Urinary incontinence after stress incontinence surgery: a risk factor for depression. Urology 2009; 73 ( 1 ): 41 – 46. Epub 2008/10/28. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Markland AD, Richter HE, Fwu CW, Eggers P, Kusek JW. Prevalence and trends of urinary incontinence in adults in the United States, 2001 to 2008 The Journal of urology 2011; 186 ( 2 ): 589 – 593. Epub 2011/06/21. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Subak L, Van Den Eeden S, Thom D, Creasman JM, Brown JS. Urinary incontinence in women: Direct costs of routine care. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2007; 197 ( 6 ): 596 e1 – 1‐9. Epub 2007/09/21. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Subak LL, Brubaker L, Chai TC, Creasman JM, Diokno AC, Goode PS, et al. High costs of urinary incontinence among women electing surgery to treat stress incontinence. Obstetrics and gynecology 2008; 111 ( 4 ): 899 – 907. Epub 2008/04/02. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Swithinbank LV, Abrams P. The impact of urinary incontinence on the quality of life of women. World journal of urology 1999; 17 ( 4 ): 225 – 229. Epub 1999/08/25. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Brocklehurst JC, Urinary incontinence in the community–analysis of a MORI poll. BMJ 1993; 306 ( 6881 ): 832 – 834. Epub 1993/03/27. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Anger JT, Nissim HA, Le TX, Smith AL, Lee U, Sarkisian C, et al. Women's experience with severe overactive bladder symptoms and treatment: insight revealed from patient focus groups. Neurourology and urodynamics 2011; 30 ( 7 ): 1295 – 1299. Epub 2011/05/04. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Howard F, Steggall M. Urinary incontinence in women: quality of life and help‐seeking. Br J Nurs 2010; 19 ( 12 ): 742, 4 6 8 – 8‐9. Epub 2010/07/14. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sandvik H, Seim A, Vanvik A, Hunskaar S. A severity index for epidemiological surveys of female urinary incontinence: comparison with 48‐hour pad‐weighing tests. Neurourology and urodynamics 2000; 19 ( 2 ): 137 – 145. Epub 2000/02/19. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA. Health‐related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) Research Group. Quality of life research: an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation 1994; 3 ( 5 ): 291 – 306. Epub 1994/10/01. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Jackson S, Donovan J, Brookes S, Eckford S, Swithinbank L, Abrams P. The Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire: development and psychometric testing. British journal of urology 1996; 77 ( 6 ): 805 – 812. Epub 1996/06/01. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Black N, Griffiths J, Pope C. Development of a symptom severity index and a symptom impact index for stress incontinence in women. Neurourology and urodynamics 1996; 15 ( 6 ): 630 – 640. Epub 1996/01/01. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Khullar V, Salvatore S. A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 1997; 104 ( 12 ): 1374 – 1379. Epub 1998/01/09. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wagner TH, Patrick DL, Bavendam TG, Martin ML, Buesching DP. Quality of life of persons with urinary incontinence: development of a new measure. Urology 1996; 47 ( 1 ): 67 – 71 discussion ‐2. Epub 1996/01/01. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bradley CS, Rovner ES, Morgan MA, Berlin M, Novi JM, Shea JA, et al. A new questionnaire for urinary incontinence diagnosis in women: development and testing. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2005; 192 ( 1 ): 66 – 73. Epub 2005/01/27. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourology and urodynamics 2004; 23 ( 4 ): 322 – 330. Epub 2004/07/01. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sandvik H, Espuna M, Hunskaar S. Validity of the incontinence severity index: comparison with pad‐weighing tests. International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction 2006; 17 ( 5 ): 520 – 524. Epub 2006/03/21. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sandvik H, Hunskaar S, Seim A, Hermstad R, Vanvik A, Bratt H. Validation of a severity index in female urinary incontinence and its implementation in an epidemiological survey. Journal of epidemiology and community health 1993; 47 ( 6 ): 497 – 499. Epub 1993/12/01. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical care 1996; 34 ( 3 ): 220 – 233. Epub 1996/03/01. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rogers RG, Kammerer‐Doak D, Villarreal A, Coates K, Qualls C. A new instrument to measure sexual function in women with urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2001; 184 ( 4 ): 552 – 558. Epub 2001/03/23. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR. Defining clinically meaningful change in health‐related quality of life. Journal of clinical epidemiology 2003; 56 ( 5 ): 395 – 407. Epub 2003/06/19. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Eton DT, Cella D, Yost KJ, Yount SE, Peterman AH, Neuberg DS, et al. A combination of distribution‐ and anchor‐based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scale. Journal of clinical epidemiology 2004; 57 ( 9 ): 898 – 910. Epub 2004/10/27. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wagg AR, Barron D, Kirby M, Stott D, Corlett K. A randomised partially controlled trial to assess the impact of self‐help vs. structured help from a continence nurse specialist in women with undiagnosed urinary problems in primary care. International journal of clinical practice 2007; 61 ( 11 ): 1863 – 1873. Epub 2007/09/04. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Minassian VA, Devore E, Hagan K, Grodstein F. Severity of urinary incontinence and effect on quality of life in women by incontinence type. Obstetrics and gynecology 2013; 121 ( 5 ): 1083 – 1090. Epub 2013/05/03. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.