Improving Test Score Reporting: Perspectives From the ETS Score Reporting Conference
dc.contributor.author | Zapata‐rivera, Diego | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zwick, Rebecca | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hullman, Jessica | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Rhodes, Rebecca | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Rodriguez, Fernando | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Shah, Priti | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sklar, Jeffrey C. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-09-03T16:51:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-09-03T16:51:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-12 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Zapata‐rivera, Diego ; Zwick, Rebecca; Hullman, Jessica; Rhodes, Rebecca; Rodriguez, Fernando; Shah, Priti; Zwick, Rebecca; Sklar, Jeffrey C.; Zapata‐rivera, Diego (2011). "Improving Test Score Reporting: Perspectives From the ETS Score Reporting Conference." ETS Research Report Series 2011(2): i-62. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/108325> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2330-8516 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2330-8516 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/108325 | |
dc.description.abstract | This volume includes 3 papers based on presentations at a workshop on communicating assessment information to particular audiences, held at Educational Testing Service (ETS) on November 4th, 2010, to explore some issues that influence score reports and new advances that contribute to the effectiveness of these reports. Jessica Hullman, Rebecca Rhodes, Fernando Rodriguez, and Priti Shah present the results of recent research on graph comprehension and data interpretation, especially the role of presentation format, the impact of prior quantitative literacy and domain knowledge, the trade‐off between reducing cognitive load and increasing active processing of data, and the affective influence of graphical displays. Rebecca Zwick and Jeffrey Sklar present the results of the Instructional Tools in Educational Measurement and Statistics for School Personnel (ITEMS) project, funded by the National Science Foundation and conducted at the University of California, Santa Barbara to develop and evaluate 3 web‐based instructional modules intended to help educators interpret test scores. Zwick and Sklar discuss the modules and the procedures used to evaluate their effectiveness. Diego Zapata‐Rivera presents a new framework for designing and evaluating score reports, based on work on designing and evaluating score reports for particular audiences in the context of the CBAL (Cognitively Based Assessment of, for, and as Learning) project (Bennett & Gitomer, 2009), which has been applied in the development and evaluation of reports for various audiences including teachers, administrators and students. | en_US |
dc.publisher | AERA | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Graphs | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Score Reporting | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Score Interpretation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Assessment Literacy | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Teacher Professional Development | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Teacher Education | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Score Reporting to Particular Audiences | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Policymakers | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Administrators | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Teachers | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Students | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Visualization | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Graph Comprehension | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Visual Displays | en_US |
dc.title | Improving Test Score Reporting: Perspectives From the ETS Score Reporting Conference | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Education | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108325/1/ets202281.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02281.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | ETS Research Report Series | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rodriguez, F., Shah, P., & Ng, A. (March, 2010 ). What reasoning strategies do novice college students use to critically evaluate scientific evidence? Paper presented at the 13th biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Philadelphia, PA. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Olzak, L. A., & Thomas, J. P. ( 1986 ). Seeing spatial displays. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.). Handbook of perception and performance: Sensory processes and perception (pp. 717 – 756 ). New York, NY: Wiley. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. ( 1986 ). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology ( Vol. 19, pp. 123 – 205 ). New York, NY: Academic Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Pinker, S. ( 1990 ). A theory of graph comprehension. In R. Freedle (Ed.), Artificial intelligence and the future of testing (pp. 73 – 126 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Reber, R., & Zupanek, N. ( 2002 ). Effects of processing fluency on estimates of probability and frequency. In P. Sedlmeier & T. Betsch (Eds.), Frequency processing and cognition (pp. 175 – 188 ). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Roberts, M. R., & Gierl, M. J. ( 2010 ). Developing score reports for cognitive diagnostic assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 29 ( 3 ), 25 – 38. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | See, Y. H., Petty, R. E., & Evans, L. M. ( 2009 ). The impact of perceived message complexity and need for cognition on information processing and attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 43 ( 5 ), 880 – 889. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Seife, C. ( 2010 ). Proofiness: The dark arts of mathematical deception. New York, NY: Viking. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shah, P. Freedman, E., & Miyake, A. ( 2011 ). Are labels really better than legends? Manuscript in review. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shah, P., & Carpenter, P. A. ( 1995 ). Conceptual limitations in comprehending line graphs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 43 – 61. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shah, P., & Freedman, E. ( 2009 ). Bar and line graph comprehension: An interaction of top‐down and bottom‐up processes. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3 ( 3 ), 560 – 578. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shah, P., Freedman, E., & Vekiri, I. ( 2005 ). The comprehension of quantitative information in graphical displays. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 426 – 476 ). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shah, P., Mayer, R. E., & Hegarty, M. ( 1999 ). Graphs as aids to knowledge construction: Signaling techniques for guiding the process of graph comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91 ( 4 ), 690 – 702. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. ( 2006a ). Intuitive confidence: Choosing between intuitive and nonintuitive alternatives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135 ( 3 ), 409 – 428. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. ( 2006b ). Intuitive confidence and the prominence effect: When consumer choices are sensitive to matching prices. Manuscript in preparation. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sklar, J., & Zwick, R. ( 2009 ). Multimedia presentations in educational measurement and statistics. Journal of Statistics Education. http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v17n3/sklar.html. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Smith, L. D., Best, L. A., Stubbs, D. A., Johnston, J., & Archibald, A. B. ( 2000 ). Scientific graphs and the hierarchy of the sciences: A Latourian survey of inscription practices. Social Studies of Science, 30, 73 – 94. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Spence, I., & Lewandowsky, S. ( 1991 ). Displaying proportions and percentages. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 61 – 77. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Stiggins, R., & Herrick, M. ( 2007 ). A status report on teacher preparation in classroom assessment. Unpublished manuscript. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sweller, J. ( 1999 ). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Australia: ACER Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Symons, C. S., & Johnson, B. T. ( 1997 ). The self‐reference effect in memory: A meta‐analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121 ( 3 ), 371 – 394. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Tetlock, P. E., & Lerner, J. S. ( 1999 ). The social contingency model: Identifying empirical and normative boundary conditions for the error‐ and‐bias portrait of human nature. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual‐process theories in social psychology (pp. 571 – 585 ). New York, NY: Guilford Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Tufte, E.R. ( 1983 ). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Tufte, E.R. ( 1996 ). Visual explanations. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Twing, J. (March, 2008 ). Score reporting, off‐the‐shelf assessments and NCLB: Truly an unholy trinity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York, NY. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Underwood, J. S., Reshetar, R., & Leahy, S. ( 2006 ). Score report design heuristics. Unpublished report. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Underwood J. S., Zapata‐Rivera D., & VanWinkle, W. ( 2007 ). Growing pains: Teachers using and learning to use IDMS. (ETS Research Rep. No. RM‐08–07). Princeton, NJ: ETS. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Underwood, J. S., Zapata‐Rivera, D., & VanWinkle, W. ( 2010 ). An evidence‐centered approach to using assessment data for policymakers. (ETS Research Rep. No. RR‐10–03). Princeton, NJ: ETS. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Utts, J. M., & Heckard, R. F. ( 2004 ). Mind on Statistics ( 2nd ed. ). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wainer, H. ( 1997 ). Visual revelations ‐ Graphical tales of fate and deception from Napoleon Bonaparte to Ross Perot. New York, NY: Copernicus Books. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wainer, H. ( 2005 ). Graphic discovery. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wainer, H. ( 2009 ). Picturing the Uncertain World: How to Understand, Communicate and Control Uncertainty through Graphical Display. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wayman, J. C., Midgley, S., & Stringfield, S. ( 2005, April). Collaborative teams to support data‐based decision making and instructional improvement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zacks, J., & Tversky, B. ( 1999 ). Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication. Memory and Cognition, 27 ( 6 ), 1073 – 1079. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zapata‐Rivera D., & VanWinkle, W. ( 2010 ). A research‐based approach to designing and evaluating score reports for teachers. ETS Research Memorandum No.RM‐10‐01. Princeton, NJ: ETS. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zapata‐Rivera, D. & VanWinkle, W., & Zwick, R. ( 2010, April). Exploring effective communication and appropriate use of assessment results through teacher score reports. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), Denver, CO. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zikmund‐Fisher, B., Fagerlin, A., & Ubel, P. ( 2008 ). Improving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics. Cancer, 113 ( 12 ), 3382 – 2290. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zwick, R., Sklar, J., Wakefield, G., Hamilton, C., Norman, A., & Folsom, D. ( 2008 ). Instructional tools in educational measurement and statistics (ITEMS) for school personnel. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27, 14 – 27. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chaiken, S. ( 1980 ). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 ( 5 ), 752 – 766. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. ( 1991 ). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8 ( 4 ), 293 – 332. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chen, E., Heritage, M., & Lee, J. ( 2005 ). Identifying and monitoring students' learning needs with technology. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10 ( 3 ), 309 – 332. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chua, H. F., Liberzon, I., Welsh, R. C., & Strecher, V. J. ( 2009 ). Neural correlates of message tailoring and self‐relatedness in smoking cessation programming. Biological Psychiatry, 65 ( 2 ), 165 – 168. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. ( 2008 ). Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal (or why New York is a large city, but New York is a civilized jungle). Psychological Science, 19 ( 2 ), 161 – 167. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N. ( 2007 ). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139 ( 4 ), 569 – 576. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). ( 1999 ). Standards for educational and psychological testing, Washington, DC: AERA. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Axsom, D., Yates, S., & Chaiken, S. ( 1987 ). Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 ( 1 ), 30 – 40. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ben‐Joseph, E. P., Dowshen, S. A., & Izenberg, N. ( 2009 ). Do parents understand growth charts? A national, internet‐based survey. Pediatrics, 124 ( 4 ), 1100 – 1109. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bennett, R. E., & Gitomer, D. H. ( 2009 ). Transforming K‐12 assessment: Integrating accountability testing, formative assessment and professional support. In C. Wyatt‐Smith & J. J. Cumming (Eds.), Educational assessment in the 21st century (pp. 43 – 62 ). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bennett, R. E., & Shepherd, M. J. ( 1982 ). Basic measurement proficiency of learning disability specialists. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5 ( 2 ), 177 – 184. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. ( 2011 ). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 56 – 64 ). New York, NY: Worth Publishers. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bless, H., & Schwarz, N. ( 1999 ). Sufficient and necessary conditions in dual‐process models: The case of mood and information processing. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual‐process theories in social psychology (pp. 423 – 440 ). New York, NY: Guilford. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Brunner, C., Fasca, C., Heinze, J., Honey, M., Light, D., Mardinach, E., & Fasca, C. ( 2005 ). Linking data and learning: The Grow Network study. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10 ( 3 ), 241 – 267. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. ( 1982 ). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116 – 131. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Morris, K. J. ( 1983 ). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 ( 4 ), 805 – 818. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Canham, M., & Hegarty, M. ( 2010 ). Effects of knowledge and display design on comprehension of complex graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20 ( 2 ), 155 – 166. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Carswell, C. M., & Wickens, C. D. ( 1987 ). Information integration and the object display: An interaction of task demands and display superiority. Ergonomics, 30, 511 – 527. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Casner, S. M., & Larkin, J. H. ( 1989 ). Cognitive efficiency considerations for good graphic design (Technical Report AIP‐81). Retrieved from the Defense Technical Information Center website: http://www.dtic.mil/cgi‐bin/GetTRDoc?Location‘U2&doc‘GetTRDoc.pdf&AD‘ADA218976. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chua, H. F., Yates, J. F., & Shah, P. ( 2006 ). Risk avoidance: Pictures versus numbers. Memory & Cognition, 34 ( 2 ), 399 – 410. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cleveland, W. S. ( 1985 ). The elements of graphing data. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth Advanced Books and Software. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, R. ( 1984 ). Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79 ( 387 ), 531 – 554. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Coburn, C. E., & Talbert, J. E. ( 2005, April). Conceptions of evidence use in school districts: Mapping the terrain. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Coburn, C. E., Honig, M. I., & Stein, M. K. ( 2009 ). What's the evidence on districts' use of evidence? In J. Bransford, D. J. Stipek, N. J. Vye, L. Gomez, & D. Lam (Eds.), The role of research in educational improvement (pp. 67 – 88 ). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Deng, N., & Yoo, H. ( 2009 ) Resources for Reporting Test Scores: A Bibliography for the Assessment Community. Prepared for the National Council on Measurement in Education. Retrieved from https://ncme.org/resources/blblio1/NCME.Bibliography‐5‐6‐09_score_reporting.pdf. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Diemand‐Yauman, C., Oppenheimer, D. M., & Vaughan, E. ( 2010 ). Fortune favors the bold ( and the Italicized ): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes. Cognition, 118 ( 1 ), 111 – 115. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.012. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | English, L. D. ( 1997 ). Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fagerlin, A., Ubel, P., Smith, D., & Zikmund‐Fisher, B. ( 2007 ). Making numbers matter: Present and future research in risk communication. American Journal of Health Behavior, 31 ( 1 ), S47 – S56. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fagerlin, A., Wang, C., & Ubel, P. ( 2005 ). Reducing the influence of anecdotal information on people's health care decisions: Is a picture worth 1,000 statistics? Medical Decision Making, 25 ( 4 ), 398 – 405. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fast, E. F. ( 2002 ) A guide to effective accountability reporting: Designing public reports that effectively communicate accountability, assessment, and other quantitative education indicators in an easily understood format. Council of Chief State School Officers. Washington, DC. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Freedman, D. Pisani, R., Purves, R., & Adhikari, A. ( 1991 ). Statistics ( 2nd ed. ). New York, NY: W. W. Norton. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gillan, D. J. & Richman, E. H. ( 1994 ). Minimalism and the syntax of graphs. Human Factors, 36 ( 4 ), 619 – 644. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Goodman, D. P., & Hambleton, R. K. ( 2004 ). Student test score reports and interpretive guides: Review of current practices and suggestions for future research. Applied Measurement in Education, 17 ( 2 ), 145 – 220. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Guerard, E. B. ( 2001, May 17). School leaders learn to make data‐driven decisions. eSchool News. Retrieved from http://www.sanbenito.k12.tx.us/departments/technology/pdf/esnbestpractices.pdf. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Guthrie, J. T., Weber, S. & Kimmerly, N. ( 1993 ). Searching documents: Cognitive processes and deficits in understanding graphs, tables, and illustrations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 186 – 221. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hambleton, R. K., & Slater, S. ( 1997 ). Are NAEP executive summary reports understandable to policy makers and educators? (CSE Technical Report 430). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Teaching. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hambleton, R. K., & Zenisky, A. ( 2010, November). Improvements to student score reporting: steps and more use of suitable methodologies. Presentation at the ETS Conference on Score Reporting, November 4–5, 2010. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hattie, J. ( 2009 ). Visibly learning from reports: The validity of score reports. Retrieved from http://www.oerj.org/View?action‘viewPDF&paper‘6. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hegarty M. ( 2004 ). Diagrams in the mind and in the world: Relations between internal and external visualizations. In A. Blackwell, K. Mariott & A. Shimojima (Eds.). Diagrammatic representation and inference. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence 2980 (pp. 1 – 13 ). Berlin, Germany: Springer‐Verlag. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hegarty, M., Kriz, S. & Cate, C. ( 2003 ). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition & Instruction, 21 ( 4 ), 209 – 249. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Honig, M. I. ( 2003 ). Building policy from practice: District central office administrators' roles and capacity for implementing collaborative education policy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39 ( 3 ), 292 – 338. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Honig, M. I., & Coburn, C. E. ( 2008 ). Evidence‐based decision‐making in school district central offices: Toward a policy and research agenda. Educational Policy, 22, 578 – 608. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Impara, J. C., Divine, K. P., Bruce, F. A., Liverman, M. R., & Gay, A. ( 1991 ). Does interpretive test score information help teachers? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10, 16 – 18. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kosslyn, S. M. ( 1994 ). Elements of graph design. New York, NY: Freeman. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kriz, S., & Hegarty, M. ( 2007 ). Top‐down and bottom‐up influences on learning from animations. International Journal of Human‐Computer Studies, 65, 911 – 930. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Larkin, J. & Simon, H. ( 1987 ) Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11 ( 1 ), 65 – 100. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Levy, E., Zacks, J., Tversky, B. & Schiano, D. ( 1996 ). Gratuitous graphics: Putting preferences in perspective. Human factors in computing systems: Conference proceedings (pp. 42 – 49 ). New York, NY: ACM. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lukin, L. E., Bandalos, D. L., Eckhout, T. J., & Mickelson, K. ( 2004 ). Facilitating the development of assessment literacy. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 23 ( 2 ), 26 – 32. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mac Iver, M. A., & Farley, E. ( 2003 ). Bringing the district back in: The role of the central office in improving instruction and student achievement (CRESPAR Report No. 65). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mayer, R. E. ( 2001 ). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mayer, R. E. ( 2003 ). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125 – 139. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mayer, R. E. ( 2005 ). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31 – 48 ). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. ( 2002 ). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 87 – 99. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. ( 2003 ). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38 ( 1 ), 43 – 52. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mayer, R.E. ( 2001 ). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Miller, N. ( 2003, February). Best practices Super Tech News, 2 ( 1 ). Retrieved from http://www.blegroup.com/supertechnews/feb03.htm#best. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Moreno, R., Mayer, R., Spires, H., & Lester, J. ( 2001 ). The case for social agency in computer‐based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19, 177 – 213. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Narayanan, N. H., & Hegarty, M. ( 2002 ). Multimedia design for communication of dynamic information. International Journal of Human‐Computer Studies, 57, 279 – 315. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). ( 1995 ). Code of professional responsibilities in educational measurement. Retrieved from http://www.ncme.org/about/docs/prof_respons.doc. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Neisser, U. ( 1963 ). Decision time without reaction time: Experiments in visual scanning. American Journal of Psychology, 76, 376 – 385. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nielsen, J. ( 1994 ). Usability engineering. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Noar, S. M., Benac, C. N., & Harris, M. S. ( 2007 ). Does tailoring matter? Meta‐analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin, 133 ( 4 ), 673 – 693. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Schwarz, N., & Simonson, I. ( 2007 ). Preference fluency and consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 44 ( 3 ), 347 – 356. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nussbaum, E. M. ( 2005 ). The effect of goal instructions and need for cognition on interactive argumentation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30 ( 3 ), 286 – 313. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.