Show simple item record

Changes in Sexual Roles and Quality of Life for Gay Men after Prostate Cancer: Challenges for Sexual Health Providers

dc.contributor.authorHart, Tae L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCoon, David W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKowalkowski, Marc A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Karenen_US
dc.contributor.authorHersom, Justin I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGoltz, Heather H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWittmann, Daniela A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLatini, David M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-03T16:52:13Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHSen_US
dc.date.available2014-09-03T16:52:13Z
dc.date.issued2014-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationHart, Tae L.; Coon, David W.; Kowalkowski, Marc A.; Zhang, Karen; Hersom, Justin I.; Goltz, Heather H.; Wittmann, Daniela A.; Latini, David M. (2014). "Changes in Sexual Roles and Quality of Life for Gay Men after Prostate Cancer: Challenges for Sexual Health Providers." The Journal of Sexual Medicine (9): 2308-2317.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1743-6095en_US
dc.identifier.issn1743-6109en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/108360
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Gay men with prostate cancer ( GMPCa ) may have differential health‐related quality of life ( HRQOL ) and sexual health outcomes than heterosexual men with prostate cancer ( PCa ), but existing information is based on clinical experience and small studies. Aims Our goals were to: (i) describe HRQOL and examine changes in sexual functioning and bother; (ii) explore the psychosocial aspects of sexual health after PCa ; and (iii) examine whether there were significant differences on HRQOL and sexual behavior between GMPCa and published norms. Methods A convenience sample of GMPCa completed validated disease‐specific and general measures of HRQOL , ejaculatory function and bother, fear of cancer recurrence, and satisfaction with prostate cancer care. Measures of self‐efficacy for PCa management, illness intrusiveness, and disclosure of sexual orientation were also completed. Where possible, scores were compared against published norms. Main Outcome Measures Main outcome measures were self‐reported sexual functioning and bother on the E xpanded P rostate C ancer I ndex. Results Compared with norms, GMPCa reported significantly worse functioning and more severe bother scores on urinary, bowel, hormonal symptom scales ( P s < 0.015–0.0001), worse mental health functioning ( P  < 0.0001), greater fear of cancer recurrence ( P  < 0.0001), and were more dissatisfied with their PCa medical care. However, GMPCa reported better sexual functioning scores ( P  < 0.002) compared with norms. Many of the observed differences met criteria for clinical significance. Physical functioning HRQOL and sexual bother scores were similar to that of published samples. GMPCa tended to be more “out” about their sexual orientation than other samples of gay men. Conclusions GMPCa reported substantial changes in sexual functioning after PCa treatment. They also reported significantly worse disease‐specific and general HRQOL , fear of recurrence, and were less satisfied with their medical care than other published PCa samples. Sexual health providers must have an awareness of the unique functional and HRQOL differences between gay and heterosexual men with PCa. Hart TL, Coon DW, Kowalkowski MA, Zhang K, Hersom JI, Goltz HH, Wittmann DA, and Latini DM. Changes in sexual roles and quality of life for gay men after prostate cancer: Challenges for sexual health providers. J Sex Med 2014;11:2308–2317.en_US
dc.publisherThe Haworth Medical Pressen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherProstate Canceren_US
dc.subject.otherGay Menen_US
dc.subject.otherQuality of Lifeen_US
dc.subject.otherSymptomen_US
dc.subject.otherFunctioningen_US
dc.titleChanges in Sexual Roles and Quality of Life for Gay Men after Prostate Cancer: Challenges for Sexual Health Providersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelUrologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108360/1/jsm12598.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jsm.12598en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Journal of Sexual Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDevins GM. Using the illness intrusiveness ratings scale to understand health‐related quality of life in chronic disease. J Psychosom Res 2010; 68: 591 – 602.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMotofei IG, Rowland DL, Popa F, Kreienkamp D, Paunica S. Preliminary study with bicalutamide in heterosexual and homosexual patients with prostate cancer: A possible implication of androgens in male homosexual arousal. BJU Int 2011; 108: 110 – 115.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWassersug RJ, Lyons A, Duncan D, Dowsett GW, Pitts M. Diagnostic and outcome differences between heterosexual and nonheterosexual men treated for prostate cancer. Urology 2013; 82: 565 – 571.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllensworth‐Davies D. Assessing localized prostate cancer post‐treatment quality of life outcomes among gay men. School of Public Health. Boston, MA: Boston University; 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldstone SE. The ups and downs of gay sex after prostate cancer treatment. In: Perlman G, Drescher J, eds. A gay man's guide to prostate cancer. Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Medical Press; 2005: 43 – 55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAsencio M, Blank T, Descartes L, Crawford A. The prospect of prostate cancer: A challenge for gay men's sexualities as they age. Sex Res Soc Policy 2009; 6: 28 – 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMitteldorf D. Psychotherapy with gay prostate cancer patients. In: Perlman G, Drescher J, eds. A gay man's guide to prostate cancer. Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Medical Press; 2005: 57 – 67.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInstitute of Medicine. The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: Building a foundation for better understanding. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLubeck DP, Litwin MS, Henning JM, Stier DM, Mazonson P, Fisk R, Carroll PR. The CaPSURE database: A methodology for clinical practice and research in prostate cancer. CaPSURE Research Panel. Cancer of the prostate strategic urologic research endeavor. Urology 1996; 48: 773 – 777.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWei JT, Dunn RL, Litwin MS, Sandler HM, Sanda MG. Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health‐related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Urology 2000; 56: 899 – 905.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWare J, Kosinski M, Keller S. SF‐36 physical and mental health summary scales: A user's manual. Boston: New England Medical Center; 1994.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36‐item short‐form health survey (SF‐36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994; 32: 40 – 66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosen RC, Catania JA, Althof SE, Pollack LM, O'Leary M, Seftel AD, Coon DW. Development and validation of four‐item version of male sexual health questionnaire to assess ejaculatory dysfunction. Urology 2007; 69: 805 – 809.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEton DT, Lepore SJ, Helgeson VS. Early quality of life in patients with localized prostate carcinoma: An examination of treatment‐related, demographic, and psychosocial factors. Cancer 2001; 92: 1451 – 1459.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHart SL, Latini DM, Cowan JE, Carroll PR. Fear of recurrence, treatment satisfaction, and quality of life after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Support Care Cancer 2008; 16: 161 – 169.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDevins GM. Illness intrusiveness and the psychosocial impact of lifestyle disruptions in chronic life‐threatening disease. Adv Ren Replace Ther 1994; 1: 251 – 263.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMohr J, Fassinger R. Measuring dimensions of lesbian and gay male experience. Meas Eval Couns Dev 2000; 33: 66 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrank SJ, Pisters LL, Davis J, Lee AK, Bassett R, Kuban DA. An assessment of quality of life following radical prostatectomy, high dose external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy iodine implantation as monotherapies for localized prostate cancer. J Urol 2007; 177: 2151 – 2156, discussion 56.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBellizzi KM, Latini DM, Cowan JE, DuChane J, Carroll PR. Fear of recurrence, symptom burden, and health‐related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Urology 2008; 72: 1269 – 1273.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchroeck FR, Krupski TL, Sun L, Albala DM, Price MM, Polascik TJ, Robertson CN, Tewari AK, Moul JW. Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 785 – 793.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomas C, Wootten A, Robinson P. The experiences of gay and bisexual men diagnosed with prostate cancer: Results from an online focus group. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2013; 22: 522 – 529.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeslin KC, Gore JL, King WD, Fox SA. Sexual orientation and testing for prostate and colorectal cancers among men in California. Med Care 2008; 46: 1240 – 1248.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarakiewicz PI, Bhojani N, Neugut A, Shariat SF, Jeldres C, Graefen M, Perrotte P, Peloquin F, Kattan MW. The effect of comorbidity and socioeconomic status on sexual and urinary function and on general health‐related quality of life in men treated with radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. J Sex Med 2008; 5: 919 – 927.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrejean J, Song R, Hernandez A, Ziebell R, Green T, Walker F, Lin LS, An Q, Mermin J, Lansky A, Hall HI, Group HIVIS. Estimated HIV incidence in the United States, 2006–2009. PLoS ONE 2011; 6: e17502.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHart TA, Wolitski RJ, Purcell DW, Gomez C, Halkitis P, Seropositive Urban Men's Study T. Sexual behavior among HIV‐positive men who have sex with men: What's in a label? J Sex Res 2003; 40: 179 – 188.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchilder AJ, Orchard TR, Buchner CS, Miller ML, Fernandes KA, Hogg RS, Strathdee SA. “It's like the treasure”: Beliefs associated with semen among young HIV‐positive and HIV‐negative gay men. Cult Health Sex 2008; 10: 667 – 679.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWittmann D, Foley S, Balon R. A biopsychosocial approach to sexual recovery after prostate cancer surgery: The role of grief and mourning. J Sex Marital Ther 2011; 37: 130 – 144.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLambda Legal. When health care isn't caring: Lambda Legal's survey of discrimination against LGBT people and people with HIV. New York: Lambda Legal; 2010.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlack D, Gates G, Sanders S, Taylor L. Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States: Evidence from available systematic data sources. Demography 2000; 37: 139 – 154.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePathela P, Hajat A, Schillinger J, Blank S, Sell R, Mostashari F. Discordance between sexual behavior and self‐reported sexual identity: A population‐based survey of New York City men. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 416 – 425.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlank TO. The challenge of prostate cancer: Half a man or a man and a half? Generations 2008; 32: 68 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlank TO. Gay men and prostate cancer: Invisible diversity. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 2593 – 2596.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee TK, Breau RH, Eapen L. Pilot study on quality of life and sexual function in men‐who‐have‐sex‐with‐men treated for prostate cancer. J Sex Med 2013; 10: 2094 – 2100.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.