Show simple item record

Low-Temperature Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor for Energy Recovery from Domestic Wastewater.

dc.contributor.authorSmith, Adam L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-13T18:18:45Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2014-10-13T18:18:45Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.date.submitted2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/108745
dc.description.abstractAnaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) treatment, which combines the anaerobic microbial conversion of organic compounds into methane-rich biogas with membrane separation of treated wastewater and microbial biomass, has been proposed for direct energy recovery from domestic wastewater. We demonstrated in a bench-scale investigation that AnMBR can achieve 92 ± 5% chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal at 15°C, but that dissolved methane in the permeate represents 40-50% of the total methane produced. If unrecovered, this methane is a lost energy source and results in substantial greenhouse gas emissions. This work motivated an evaluation of the trade-offs between the membrane biofilm’s role in treatment and its contribution to fouling. We demonstrated that the development of a biofilm enriched in active syntrophic bacteria and methanogens significantly improved effluent quality, while maintaining acceptable fluxes. However, methanogenesis in the biofilm resulted in substantial levels of dissolved methane in the permeate. The lower temperature limit of AnMBR treatment was explored by sequentially lowering the operating temperature of the system from 15, 12, 9, 6, to 3°C under conditions supporting biofilm treatment. COD removal > 95% was achieved at temperatures as low as 6°C. COD removal fell to 86 ± 4.0% at 3°C and, at this temperature, essentially all COD removal occurred in the biofilm, suggesting that the biofilm was less inhibited by temperature decreases than the suspended biomass. Finally, we evaluated the life cycle environmental and economic impacts of AnMBR technology compared to aerobic treatment systems. AnMBR will not be net energy positive in the foreseeable future without reduction in fouling control energy demands. Currently, AnMBR is better suited for higher strength domestic wastewater treatment. Further, global warming impacts were over an order of magnitude higher than aerobic systems arising from the direct emission of effluent dissolved methane. Future research is necessary to (1) promote increased biological activity in suspended biomass at low temperatures such that membrane biofilm treatment is reduced and dissolved methane oversaturation avoided, (2) develop low-energy dissolved methane recovery technologies to limit global warming impacts, and (3) establish fouling control strategies that reduce energy demands thereby improving the net energy balance.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectAnaerobic Membrane Bioreactoren_US
dc.subjectDomestic Wastewateren_US
dc.subjectPsychrophilicen_US
dc.subjectBiofilmen_US
dc.subjectMolecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectLife Cycle Assessmenten_US
dc.titleLow-Temperature Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor for Energy Recovery from Domestic Wastewater.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEnvironmental Engineeringen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberRaskin, Lutgarde M.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSkerlos, Stevenen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberRagsdale, Stephen W.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberLove, Nancy G.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberVerstraete, Willy Henryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelCivil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108745/1/alsmit_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.