Show simple item record

Long Way, Long Time: Learning and Living Aboriginal Culture in Tasmania.

dc.contributor.authorBerk, Christopher D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-13T18:19:14Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2014-10-13T18:19:14Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/108803
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation focuses on the history and culture of the Tasmanian Aboriginal people. Specifically, it addresses the intricate relationship between disjuncture, cultural revitalization, public presentation, and legitimation. Historically presented as “Paleolithic Man” by prominent theorists like Charles Darwin and Edward Burnett Tylor, the Tasmanians were conceptualized as the “rudest” culture ever documented. They became an iconic case of savagery extinguished in the name of progress following their perceived extinction in 1876. Despite this powerful narrative of disappearance, the Tasmanian Aboriginal people have long been at the forefront of indigenous rights movements in Australia. My dissertation strives to explain why this is so. After analyzing the place of the Tasmanian Aboriginal people in social thought, I proceed to challenge the centrality of race in popular conceptions of indigeneity. I contend that, in Aboriginal Tasmania at least, racial purity is secondary to geographical and familial ties in the comparative evaluation of community status and social esteem. Next, I examine the ways in which the Tasmanian Aboriginal people have revived many elements of their “lost” culture, including material culture production (basketry, bark canoes, kelp water carriers, etc.) and language. The investigation of these processes of cultural revitalization, and how they interact with post-colonial and “unbroken” traditions, provides a valuable lens through which common understandings of continuity and hybridity are challenged and complicated. These articulations, and the ways in which they are formatted for public consumption in museum exhibits, heritage campaigns, and education programs, are emblematic of broader efforts to form connections in the face of notable gaps and separations. This “gap-work” highlights the continuity between the ancestors and today’s community. I argue many of these connections are compensatory; they compensate for gaps that cannot be closed. Alternatively, they highlight the productivity of disjuncture in the formation of emergent meanings and identities. All this work, through revitalization programs and other avenues, is informed by post-settlement identities shaped on the Bass Strait Islands and Tasmania proper. The present and the past connect and interact in compelling ways, defining contemporary Tasmanian Aboriginality in a dialectical manner.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectCultural Revitalizationen_US
dc.subjectIndigeneityen_US
dc.subjectAustraliaen_US
dc.subjectSettler Colonialismen_US
dc.subjectMuseum Studiesen_US
dc.titleLong Way, Long Time: Learning and Living Aboriginal Culture in Tasmania.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineAnthropologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberShryock, Andrew J.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSilverman, Raymond A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberMeek, Barbra A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberRoberts, Elizabeth Fsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelAnthropology and Archaeologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108803/1/cberk_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.