View Item 

Show simple item record

The Law Presidential Studies, Behavioralism, and Public Law
dc.contributor.authorSollenberger, Mitchel A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-04T16:35:39Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_14_MONTHSen_US
dc.date.available2014-11-04T16:35:39Z
dc.date.issued2014-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationSollenberger, Mitchel A. (2014). " The Law Presidential Studies, Behavioralism, and Public Law." Presidential Studies Quarterly (4): 758-778.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0360-4918en_US
dc.identifier.issn1741-5705en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/109319
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherHoughton Mifflinen_US
dc.titleThe Law Presidential Studies, Behavioralism, and Public Lawen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelGovernment, Politics and Lawen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109319/1/psq12159.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/psq.12159en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePresidential Studies Quarterlyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRicci, David M. 1984. The Tragedy of Political Science: Politics, Scholarship, and Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSnyder, Jack. 2003. “ ‘Is’ and ‘Ought’: Evaluating Empirical Aspects of Normative Research.” In Progress in International Relations Theory, eds. Colin Elman and Miriam Fendius Elman. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 349 ‐ 377.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSomit, Albert, and Joseph Tanenhaus. 1963. “ Trends in American Political Science: Some Analytical Notes.” American Political Science Review 57 ( December ): 933 ‐ 947.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpitzer, Robert J. 1988. The Presidential Veto: Touchstone of the American Presidency. Albany: State University of New York Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpitzer, Robert J.. 2008. Saving the Constitution from Lawyers. New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStark, Andrew. 2002. “ Why Political Scientists Aren't Public Intellectuals.” PS: Political Science and Politics 35 ( September ): 577 ‐ 579.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTatalovich, Raymond, and Steven E. Schier. 2014. The Presidency and Political Science. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 95 ‐ 113.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTatalovich, Raymond, Travis Cook, and Scott Yenor. 2000. “ The Constitutional Presidency: Conservative Scholarship and Energy in the Executive. ” In The Presidency Then and Now, ed. Phillip G. Henderson. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWahlke, John C. 1978. “ Pre‐Behavioralism in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 73 ( March ): 9 ‐ 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWasby, Stephen L. 2006. “ Silencing the Dummy Variable: A Plea to Heed One's Audience and Publish More.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 ( July ): 491 ‐ 493.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhitford, Andrew B., and Jeff Yates. 2009. Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhittington, Keith E. 1999. Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhittington, Keith E.. 2000. “ Once More unto the Breach: Postbehavioralist Approaches to Judicial Politics.” Law and Social Inquiry 25 ( April ): 601 ‐ 634.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, Woodrow. 1908. Constitutional Government in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, Woodrow. 1911. “ The Law and the Facts.” American Political Science Review 5 ( February ): 1 ‐ 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllport, Floyd H. 1927. “ Political Science and Psychology.” In The Social Sciences and Their Interrelations, eds. William F. Ogburn and Alexander Goldenweiser. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 259 ‐ 278.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlmond, Gabriel A. 1988. “ Separate Tables: Schools and Sects in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 21 ( Fall ): 828 ‐ 842.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlmond, Gabriel A.. 1990. A Discipline Divided: Schools and Sects in Political Science. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArnold, Peri E. 1986. Making the Managerial Presidency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarber, James David. 1992. The Presidential Character: Predicting Performance in the White House. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaum, Lawrence. 1983. “ Judicial Politics: Still a Distinctive Field.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed. Ada W. Finiter. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association, 189 ‐ 216.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeard, Charles A. 1927. “ Time, Technology, and the Creative Spirit in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 21 ( February ): 1 ‐ 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecker, Theodore L. 1970. “ Judiciary Theory.” In Approaches to the Study of Political Science, eds. Michael Haas and Henry S. Kariel. Scranton, PA: Chandler Publishing, 144 ‐ 166.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBessette, Joseph M., and Jeffrey Tulis. 1981. The Constitutional Presidency. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBond, Jon R. 2007. “ The Scientification of the Study of Politics: Some Observations on the Behavioral Evolution in Political Science.” Journal of Politics 69 ( November ): 897 ‐ 907.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConrad, Courtenay Ryals, and Will H. Moore. 2010. “ What Stops the Torture? ” American Journal of Political Science 54 ( April ): 459 ‐ 476.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorwin, Edward S. 1929. “ The Democratic Dogma and the Future of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 23 ( August ): 569 ‐ 592.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorwin, Edward S.. 1932. “ Social Planning Under the Constitution—A Study in Perspectives.” American Political Science Review 26 ( February ): 1 ‐ 27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorwin, Edward S.. 1957. The President: Office and Powers, 1789‐1957. New York: New York University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCronin, Thomas E. 1975. The State of the Presidency. Boston: Little, Brown.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCronin, Thomas E.. 1979. “ Presidential Power Revised and Reappraised.” Western Political Quarterly 32 ( December ): 381 ‐ 395.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrouch, Jeffrey P. 2009. The Presidential Pardon Power. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDahl, Robert A. 1961. “ The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest.” American Political Science Review 55 ( December ): 763 ‐ 772.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDahl, Robert A.. 2004. “ What Have We Learned? ” In Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics, eds. Ian Shapiro, Rogers M. Smith, and Tarek E. Masoud. New York: Cambridge University Press, 377 ‐ 394.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDickinson, Matthew J. 2009. “ We All Want a Revolution: Neustadt, New Institutionalism, and the Future of Presidency Research.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 39 ( December ): 736 ‐ 770.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDixon, Robert G., Jr. 1971. “Who Is Listening? Political Science Research in Public Law.” PS: Political Science and Politics 4 ( Winter ): 19 ‐ 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDragu, Tiberiu, and Mattias Polborn. 2013. “ The Administrative Foundation of the Rule of Law.” Journal of Politics 75 ( October ): 1038 ‐ 1050.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDragu, Tiberiu, and Mattias Polborn. 2014. “ The Rule of Law in the Fight against Terrorism.” American Journal of Political Science 58 ( April ): 511 ‐ 525.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEastland, Terry. 1992. Energy in the Executive: The Case for the Strong Presidency. New York: Free Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEaston, David. 1969a. “ The New Revolution in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 63 ( December ): 1051 ‐ 1061.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEaston, David. 1969b. “ The Condition of American Political Science.” In Behavioralism in Political Science, ed. Heinz Eulau. New York: Atherton Press, 22 ‐ 36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarr, James. 1995. “ Remembering the Revolution: Behavioralism in American Political Science.” In Political Science in History: Research Programs and Political Traditions, eds. James Farr, John S. Dryzek, and Stephen T. Leonard. New York: Cambridge University Press, 198 ‐ 224.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher, Louis. 1988. Constitutional Dialogues: Interpretation as Political Process. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher, Louis. 2008. The Constitution and 9/11: Recurring Threats to America's Freedoms. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher, Louis. 2011. Defending Congress and the Constitution. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher, Louis. 2012. “ Teaching the Presidency: Idealizing a Constitutional Office.” PS: Political Science and Politics 45 ( January ): 17 ‐ 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher, Louis. 2013a. Presidential War Power. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher, Louis. 2013b. “ Political Scientist as Practitioner.” PS: Political Science and Politics 46 ( July ): 519 ‐ 523.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher, Louis. 2014. “ Connecting Presidential Power to Public Law.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 44 ( March ): 157 ‐ 172.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFuller, Lon L. 1940. The Law in Quest of Itself. Boston: Beacon Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGenovese, Michael A. 2013. A Presidential Nation: Causes, Consequences, and Cures. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGerring, John, and Joshua Yesnowitz. 2006. “ A Normative Turn in Political Science.” Polity 38 ( January ): 101 ‐ 133.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlad, Betty. 1980. Jimmy Carter: In Search of the Great White House. New York: Norton.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoodnow, Frank J. 1904. “ The Work of the American Political Science Association.” Proceedings of the American Political Science Association 1: 35 ‐ 44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen, Donald, and Ian Shapiro. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen, Donald, and Ian Shapiro. 1996. “ Pathologies Revisited: Reflections on Our Critics.” The Rational Choice Controversy: Economic Models of Politics Reconsidered, ed. Jeffrey Friedman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 235 ‐ 276.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaines, Charles Grove. 1940. “ The Adaptation of Administrative Law and Procedure to Constitutional Theories and Principles.” American Political Science Review 34 ( February ): 1 ‐ 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHargrove, Erwin C. 2001. “ Presidential Power and Political Science.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 31 ( June ): 245 ‐ 261.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHart, John. 1977. “ Presidential Power Revisited.” Political Studies 25 ( March ): 48 ‐ 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHauptmann, Emily. 2012. “ The Ford Foundation and the Rise of Behavioralism in Political Science.” Journal of the History of Behavioral Sciences 48 ( Spring ): 154 ‐ 173.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHess, Stephen. 2002. Organizing the Presidency. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHill, Kim Quaile. 2012. “ In Search of General Theory.” Journal of Politics 74 ( October ): 917 ‐ 931.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHowell, William G. 2003. Power without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHowell, William G.. 2013. Thinking about the Presidency: The Primacy of Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHyneman, Charles S. 1959. The Study of Politics: The Present State of American Political Science. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJacobs, Lawrence R., and Theda Skocpol. 2006. “ Restoring the Tradition of Rigor and Relevance to Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 ( January ): 27 ‐ 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaufman‐Osborn, Timothy V. 2006. “ Dividing the Domain of Political Science: On the Fetishism of Subfields.” Polity 38 ( January ): 41 ‐ 71.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeith, Linda Camp, C. Neal Tate, and Steven C. Poe. 2009. “ Is the Law a Mere Parchment Barrier to Human Rights Abuse? ” Journal of Politics 71 ( April ): 644 ‐ 660.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKirn, Michael E. 1977. “ Behavioralism, Post‐Behavioralism, and the Philosophy of Science: Two Houses, One Plague.” Review of Politics 39 ( January ): 82 ‐ 102.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKleinerman, Benjamin A. 2014. “ The Constitutional Ambitions of James Madison's Presidency.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 44 ( March ): 6 ‐ 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeonard, Stephen T. 1995. “ The Pedagogical Purposes of a Political Science.” In Political Science in History: Research Programs and Political Traditions, eds. James Farr, John S. Dryzek, and Stephen T. Leonard. New York: Cambridge University Press, 66 ‐ 98.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLlewellyn, Karl N. 1930. “ Realistic Jurisprudence—The Next Step.” Columbia Law Review 30 ( April ): 431 ‐ 465.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaveety, Nancy, ed. 2003. The Pioneers of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMead, Lawrence M. 2010. “ Scholasticism in Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 8 ( June ): 453 ‐ 464.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerriam, Charles E. 1926. “ Progress in Political Research.” American Political Science Review 20 ( February ): 1 ‐ 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, Eugene F. 1972. “ Positivism, Historicism, and Political Inquiry.” American Political Science Review 66 ( September ): 796 ‐ 817.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, Trudi C. 1990. “ Normative Political Science.” Policy Studies Review 9 ( Winter ): 232 ‐ 246.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorgan, Donald G. 1966. Congress and the Constitution: A Study of Responsibility. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMunro, William Bennett. 1928. “ Physics and Politics—An Old Analogy Revised.” American Political Science Review 22 ( February ): 1 ‐ 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNelson, Michael. 1987. “ Rossiter Revisited.” In The American Presidency, ed. Clinton Rossiter. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, xi ‐ xxix.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeustadt, Richard E. 1960. Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership. New York: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeustadt, Richard E.. 1990. Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents. New York: Free Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOren, Ido. 2006. “ Can Political Science Emulate the Natural Sciences? The Problem of Self‐Disconfirming Analysis.” Polity 38 ( January ): 72 ‐ 100.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePfiffner, James. P. 2009. Power Play: The Bush Presidency and the Constitution. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePious, Richard M. 1979. The American Presidency. New York: Basic Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePious, Richard M.. 2006. The War on Terrorism and the Rule of Law. New York: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePious, Richard M.. 2008. Why Presidents Fail. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePosner, Eric A., and Adrian Vermeule. 2010. The Executive Unbound: After the Madisonian Republic. New York: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePritchett, C. Herman. 1968. “ Public Law and Judicial Behavior.” Journal of Politics 30 ( May ): 480 ‐ 509.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePS. 2000. “ An Open Letter to the APSA Leadership and Members.” PS: Political Science and Politics 33 ( December ): 735 ‐ 737.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePutnam, Robert D. 2003. “ APSA Presidential Address: The Public Role of Political Science. ” Perspectives on Politics 1 ( June ): 249 ‐ 255.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePyle, Christopher H., and Richard M. Pious, eds. 1984. The President, Congress, and the Constitution: Power and Legitimacy in American Politics. New York: Free Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReedy, George E. 1970. The Twilight of the Presidency. New York: World Publishing.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReid, Herbert G., and Ernest J. Yanarella. 1975. “ Political Science and the Post‐Modern Critique of Scientism and Domination.” Review of Politics 37 ( July ): 286 ‐ 316.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRudalevige, Andrew. 2009. “ The Administrative Presidency and Bureaucratic Control: Implementing a Research Agenda.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 39 ( March ): 10 ‐ 24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSartori, Giovanni. 2004. “ Where Is Political Science Going? ” PS: Political Science and Politics 37 ( October ): 785 ‐ 787.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchauer, Frederick. 1985. “ Easy Cases.” Southern California Law Review 58 ( January ): 399 ‐ 440.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchubert, Glendon. 1963. “ Behavioral Research in Public Law.” American Political Science Review 57 ( June ): 433 ‐ 445.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchubert, Glendon. 1975. Human Jurisprudence: Public Law as Political Science. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShapiro, Ian. 2004. “ Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or: What's Wrongwith Political Science and What to Do about It.” In Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics, eds. Ian Shapiro, Rogers M. Smith, and Tarek E. Masoud. New York: Cambridge University Press, 19 ‐ 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSherwood, Foster H. 1958. “ The Role of Public Law in Political Science.” In Approaches to the Study of Politics, ed. Roland Young. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 86 ‐ 96.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSigelman, Lee. 2006. “ The Coevolution of American Political Science and the American Political Science Review.” American Political Science Review 100 ( November ): 463 ‐ 478.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSkowronek, Stephen. 2011. “ Shall We Cast Our Lot with the Constitution? ” In The Presidency in the Twenty‐First Century, ed. Charles W. Dunn. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 29 ‐ 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, Rogers M. 1997. “ Still Blowing in the Wind: The American Quest for a Democratic, Scientific Political Science.” Daedalus 126 ( Winter ): 253 ‐ 287.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
psq12159.pdf
Size:
118.2KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.