View Item 

Show simple item record

Short‐term effects of a modified A lt‐ RAMEC protocol for early treatment of C lass III malocclusion: a controlled study
dc.contributor.authorMasucci, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFranchi, L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGiuntini, V.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDefraia, E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-04T16:35:58Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHSen_US
dc.date.available2014-11-04T16:35:58Z
dc.date.issued2014-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationMasucci, C.; Franchi, L.; Giuntini, V.; Defraia, E. (2014). "Short‐term effects of a modified A lt‐ RAMEC protocol for early treatment of C lass III malocclusion: a controlled study." Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research 17(4): 259-269.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1601-6335en_US
dc.identifier.issn1601-6343en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/109361
dc.publisherNeedham Pressen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherInterceptive Treatmenten_US
dc.subject.otherCephalometryen_US
dc.subject.otherAngle Class III Malocclusionen_US
dc.titleShort‐term effects of a modified A lt‐ RAMEC protocol for early treatment of C lass III malocclusion: a controlled studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109361/1/ocr12051.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ocr.12051en_US
dc.identifier.sourceOrthodontics & Craniofacial Researchen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcNamara JA Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 449 – 69.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiou EJ, Tsai WC. A new protocol for maxillary protraction in cleft patients: repetitive weekly protocol of alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005; 42: 121 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang YC, Chang PM, Liou EJ. Opening of circumaxillary sutures by alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 230 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDo‐deLatour TB, Ngan P, Martin CA, Razmus T, Gunel E. Effect of alternate maxillary expansion and contraction on protraction of the maxilla: a pilot study. Hong Kong Dent J 2009; 6: 72 – 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsci D, Turk T, Elekdag‐Turk S. Activation – deactivation rapid palatal expansion and reverse headgear in Class III cases. Eur J Orthod 2010; 32: 706 – 15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFranchi L, Baccetti T, Masucci C, Defraia E. Early Alt‐RAMEC and facial mask protocol in class III malocclusion. J Clin Orthod 2011; 45: 601 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMelsen B. Adult Orthodontics. Chichester, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell; 2012. p. 95, 206.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFranchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA. Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126: 555 – 68.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJacobson A. The, “Wits” appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 470 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod 2005; 11: 119 – 29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNgan PW, Hagg U, Yiu C, Wei SH. Treatment response and long‐term dentofacial adaptations to maxillary expansion and protraction. Semin Orthod 1997; 3: 255 – 64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlakter MJ, Albino JE, Fox RN, Lewis EA. Reliability and stability of the orthodontic patient cooperation scale. Am J Orthod 1980; 78: 559 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKircelli BH, Pektas ZO. Midfacial protraction with skeletally anchored facemask therapy: a novel approach and preliminary results. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 440 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 1953; 39: 729 – 55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLesack K, Naugler C. An open‐source software program for performing Bonferroni and related corrections for multiple comparisons. J Pathol Inform 2011; 2: 52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992; 112: 155 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWestwood PV, McNamara JA Jr, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Sarver DM. Long‐term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123: 306 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 2009; 41: 1149 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpringate SD. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula. Eur J Orthod 2012; 34: 158 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacdonald KE, Kapust AJ, Turley PK. Cephalometric changes after correction of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116: 13 – 24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLavergne J, Gasson N. Operational definitions of mandibular morphogenetic and positional rotations. Scand J Dent Res 1977; 85: 185 – 92.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcNamara JA Jr, Brudon WL. Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Ann Arbor, MI: Needham Press; 2001. pp. 375 – 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMasucci C, Franchi L, Mucedero M, Defraia E, Cozza P, Baccetti T. Stability of rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy: a long‐term controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: 493 – 500.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCevidanes L, Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA, De Clerck H. Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 799 – 806.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee NK, Yang IH, Baek SH. The short‐term treatment effects of face mask therapy in Class III patients based on the anchorage device. Angle Orthod 2012; 82: 846 – 52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGe YS, Liu J, Chen L, Han JL, Guo X. Dentofacial effects of two facemask therapies for maxillary protraction miniscrew implants versus rapid maxillary expanders. Angle Orthod 2012; 82: 1083 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiou EJ. Effective maxillary orthopedic protraction for growing Class III patients: a clinical application simulates distraction osteogenesis. Prog Orthod 2005; 6: 154 – 71.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ocr12051.pdf
Size:
337.2KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.