Show simple item record

Self-Regulation and Regulatory Discretion: Why Firms May Be Reluctant to Signal Green

dc.contributor.authorLyon, Thomas P.
dc.contributorMaxwell, John W.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-21T14:46:24Z
dc.date.available2014-11-21T14:46:24Z
dc.date.issued2015-02
dc.identifier1254en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/109417
dc.description.abstractA large literature in strategy and management has focused on why firms self-regulate and "signal green." We show this decision becomes more complex when regulators have enforcement discretion, and both firms and regulators act strategically. We model the managerial decision whether to signal the firm's type through substantial self-regulation, or whether to stay in step with the rest of the industry through modest levels of self-regulation. Self-regulation is a double-edged sword: it can potentially preempt legislation, but it can also lead regulators to demand higher levels of compliance from greener firms if preemption fails. We show how self-regulatory decisions depend upon industry characteristics and political responsiveness to corporate environmental leadership.en_US
dc.subjectself-regulationen_US
dc.subjectsignalingen_US
dc.subjectregulatoryen_US
dc.subjectflexibilityen_US
dc.subject.classificationBusiness Economicsen_US
dc.titleSelf-Regulation and Regulatory Discretion: Why Firms May Be Reluctant to Signal Greenen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusiness
dc.contributor.affiliationumRoss School of Businessen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherIndiana University - Kelley School of Business - Department of Business Economics & Public Policy; Richard Ivey School of Businessen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arbor
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109417/1/1254_Lyon.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109417/4/1254_Lyon_Feb2015.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 1254_Lyon_Feb2015.pdf : February 2015 revision
dc.owningcollnameBusiness, Stephen M. Ross School of - Working Papers Series


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.