Evaluation of potential pavement profile reference devices: 2013 reference profiler benchmark test evaluation
dc.contributor.author | Karamihas, Steven M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Perera, Rohan W. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-05T20:31:33Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-05T20:31:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-01 | |
dc.identifier | 103141 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | UMTRI-2014-31 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/109438 | |
dc.description.abstract | This report provides the results from an evaluation of reference profilers that was performed in May 2013. The evaluation tested the profile measurement accuracy, profile measurement repeatability, and longitudinal distance measurement accuracy of the reference profilers. The accuracy of the devices was evaluated by comparing the measurements with benchmark measurements that were deemed to be correct. A self-propelled and self-piloting robotic profiler that was developed by the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute was used to collect the benchmark profiles. Benchmark longitudinal distance measurements were obtained using a nylon-coated steel tape corrected for temperature. Testing was performed at the MnROAD research facility in Albertville, Minnesota. Six test sections were used for the evaluation. The texture types of the sections were dense-graded asphalt, chip seal, pervious asphalt, transversely tined concrete, longitudinally tined concrete, and diamond ground concrete. Two vendors, Surface Systems and Instruments (SSI) and International Cybernetics Corporation (ICC) participated in the evaluation. Data were collected with a SSI CS 8800 unit and two ICC SurPRO units. The main report summarizes the experiment and provides a listing of which devices achieved a passing score for each criterion on each test section. The appendices provide much more detail about the performance of each device. The appendices include a summary for each device from each experiment, as well as individual “report cards” for each device on each test section. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Soil and Materials Engineers, Inc. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 246 | en_US |
dc.language | English | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Pavements | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Measurement | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Instruments for Measuring Roughness | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Profilometers | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Cross Correlation | en_US |
dc.title | Evaluation of potential pavement profile reference devices: 2013 reference profiler benchmark test evaluation | en_US |
dc.type | Technical Report | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Transportation | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Engineering | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109438/1/103141.pdf | |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of 103141.pdf : final report | |
dc.owningcollname | Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.