Show simple item record

Factors influencing malaria control policy-making in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania

dc.contributor.authorMutero, Clifford M
dc.contributor.authorKramer, Randall A
dc.contributor.authorPaul, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorLesser, Adriane
dc.contributor.authorMiranda, Marie L
dc.contributor.authorMboera, Leonard E
dc.contributor.authorKiptui, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorKabatereine, Narcis
dc.contributor.authorAmeneshewa, Birkinesh
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T17:44:29Z
dc.date.available2014-12-08T17:44:29Z
dc.date.issued2014-08-08
dc.identifier.citationMalaria Journal. 2014 Aug 08;13(1):305
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/109455en_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Policy decisions for malaria control are often difficult to make as decision-makers have to carefully consider an array of options and respond to the needs of a large number of stakeholders. This study assessed the factors and specific objectives that influence malaria control policy decisions, as a crucial first step towards developing an inclusive malaria decision analysis support tool (MDAST). Methods Country-specific stakeholder engagement activities using structured questionnaires were carried out in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania. The survey respondents were drawn from a non-random purposeful sample of stakeholders, targeting individuals in ministries and non-governmental organizations whose policy decisions and actions are likely to have an impact on the status of malaria. Summary statistics across the three countries are presented in aggregate. Results Important findings aggregated across countries included a belief that donor preferences and agendas were exerting too much influence on malaria policies in the countries. Respondents on average also thought that some relevant objectives such as engaging members of parliament by the agency responsible for malaria control in a particular country were not being given enough consideration in malaria decision-making. Factors found to influence decisions regarding specific malaria control strategies included donor agendas, costs, effectiveness of interventions, health and environmental impacts, compliance and/acceptance, financial sustainability, and vector resistance to insecticides. Conclusion Malaria control decision-makers in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania take into account health and environmental impacts as well as cost implications of different intervention strategies. Further engagement of government legislators and other policy makers is needed in order to increase funding from domestic sources, reduce donor dependence, sustain interventions and consolidate current gains in malaria.
dc.titleFactors influencing malaria control policy-making in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109455/1/12936_2014_Article_3344.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1475-2875-13-305en_US
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderMutero et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.date.updated2014-12-08T17:44:30Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.