Show simple item record

Prehospital intravenous access and fluid resuscitation in severe sepsis: an observational cohort study

dc.contributor.authorSeymour, Christopher W
dc.contributor.authorCooke, Colin R
dc.contributor.authorHeckbert, Susan R
dc.contributor.authorSpertus, John A
dc.contributor.authorCallaway, Clifton W
dc.contributor.authorMartin-Gill, Christian
dc.contributor.authorYealy, Donald M
dc.contributor.authorRea, Thomas D
dc.contributor.authorAngus, Derek C
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T17:45:34Z
dc.date.available2014-12-08T17:45:34Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-27
dc.identifier.citationCritical Care. 2014 Sep 27;18(5):533
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/109483en_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract Introduction Prompt treatment of severe sepsis in the Emergency Department reduces deaths, but the role of prehospital fluid resuscitation is unknown. We sought to determine the risk-adjusted association between prehospital fluid administration and hospital mortality among emergency medical services (EMS) patients admitted with severe sepsis. Methods We performed a prospective, observational study of patients hospitalized with severe sepsis on admission among 45,394 adult EMS encounters taken to 15 hospitals from 11/2009 to 12/2010 by a two-tier EMS system in King County, Washington. The region mandated recording of prehospital intravenous catheter and fluid administration in prehospital records, along with detailed demographic, incident, physiologic, and hospital adjustment variables. We determined the effect of prehospital intravenous catheter or fluid versus no catheter or fluid on all-cause mortality using multivariable logistic regression. Results Of all encounters, 1,350 met criteria for severe sepsis on admission, of whom 205 (15%) died by hospital discharge, 312 (23%) received prehospital intravenous fluid, 90 (7%) received a prehospital catheter alone and 948 (70%) did not receive catheter or fluid. EMS administered a median prehospital fluid volume of 500 mL (interquartile range (IQR): 200, 1000 mL). In adjusted models, the administration of any prehospital fluid was associated with reduced hospital mortality (Odds ratio =0.46; 95% Confidence interval: 0.23, 0.88; P =0.02) compared to no prehospital fluid. The odds of hospital mortality were also lower among severe sepsis patients treated with prehospital intravenous catheter alone (Odds ratio =0.3; 95% Confidence interval: 0.17 to 0.57; P <0.01). Conclusions In a population-based study, the administration of prehospital fluid and placement of intravenous access were associated with decreased odds of hospital mortality compared with no prehospital catheter or fluid.
dc.titlePrehospital intravenous access and fluid resuscitation in severe sepsis: an observational cohort study
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109483/1/13054_2014_Article_533.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13054-014-0533-xen_US
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderSeymour et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.date.updated2014-12-08T17:45:35Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.