Show simple item record

Implementation of smoking cessation guidelines in the emergency department: a qualitative study of staff perceptions

dc.contributor.authorKatz, David A
dc.contributor.authorPaez, Monica W
dc.contributor.authorReisinger, Heather S
dc.contributor.authorGillette, Meghan T
dc.contributor.authorWeg, Mark W V
dc.contributor.authorTitler, Marita G
dc.contributor.authorNugent, Andrew S
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Laurence J
dc.contributor.authorHolman, John E
dc.contributor.authorOno, Sarah S
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T17:47:03Z
dc.date.available2014-12-08T17:47:03Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-24
dc.identifier.citationAddiction Science & Clinical Practice. 2014 Jan 24;9(1):1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/109527en_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background The US Public Health Service smoking cessation practice guideline specifically recommends that physicians and nurses strongly advise their patients who use tobacco to quit, but the best approach for attaining this goal in the emergency department (ED) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to characterize emergency physicians’ (EPs) and nurses’ (ENs) perceptions of cessation counseling and to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation of the 5 A’s framework (Ask-Advise-Assess-Assist-Arrange) in the ED. Methods We conducted semi-structured, face-to-face interviews of 11 EPs and 19 ENs following a pre-post implementation trial of smoking cessation guidelines in two study EDs. We used purposeful sampling to target EPs and ENs with different attitudes toward cessation counseling, based on their responses to a written survey (Decisional Balance Questionnaire). Conventional content analysis was used to inductively characterize the issues raised by study participants and to construct a coding structure, which was then applied to study transcripts. Results The main findings of this study converged upon three overarching domains: 1) reactions to the intervention; 2) perceptions of patients’ receptivity to cessation counseling; and 3) perspectives on ED cessation counseling and preventive care. ED staff expressed ambivalence toward the implementation of smoking cessation guidelines. Both ENs and EPs agreed that the delivery of smoking cessation counseling is important, but that it is not always practical in the ED on account of time constraints, the competing demands of acute care, and resistance from patients. Participants also called attention to the need for improved role clarity and teamwork when implementing the 5 A’s in the ED. Conclusions There are numerous challenges to the implementation of smoking cessation guidelines in the ED. ENs are generally willing to take the lead in offering brief cessation counseling, but their efforts need to be reinforced by EPs. ED systems need to address workflow, teamwork, and practice policies that facilitate prescription of smoking cessation medication, referral for cessation counseling, and follow-up in primary care. The results of this qualitative evaluation can be used to guide the design of future ED intervention studies. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT00756704
dc.titleImplementation of smoking cessation guidelines in the emergency department: a qualitative study of staff perceptions
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109527/1/13722_2013_Article_234.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1940-0640-9-1en_US
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderKatz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.date.updated2014-12-08T17:47:03Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.