Show simple item record

Development of an international online learning platform for hepatopancreatobiliary surgical training: a needs assessment

dc.contributor.authorWarner, Susanne G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorConnor, Saxonen_US
dc.contributor.authorChristophi, Christopheren_US
dc.contributor.authorAzodo, Ijeoma A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKent, Taraen_US
dc.contributor.authorPier, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorMinter, Rebecca M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-09T16:53:49Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHSen_US
dc.date.available2014-12-09T16:53:49Z
dc.date.issued2014-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationWarner, Susanne G.; Connor, Saxon; Christophi, Christopher; Azodo, Ijeoma A.; Kent, Tara; Pier, David; Minter, Rebecca M. (2014). "Development of an international online learning platform for hepatopancreatobiliary surgical training: a needs assessment." HPB (12): 1127-1132.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-182Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1477-2574en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/109609
dc.description.abstractBackground The A mericas Hepato‐Pancreato‐Biliary Association ( AHPBA ) and the Australian and New Zealand Hepatic, Pancreatic and Biliary Association ( ANZHPBA ) are developing an online distance learning curriculum to facilitate an interactive didactic experience for hepatopancreatobiliary ( HPB ) fellows in the operationalization of existing HPB fellow curricula. Two needs assessment surveys were carried out to identify the optimal structure and process for deployment in fellow education. Methods A 22‐question survey querying fellows' learning styles and current and anticipated use of learning tools was disseminated electronically to 38 N orth A merican and A ustralasian HPB fellows. A follow‐up 20‐question survey was administered to assess fellows' feelings regarding online content. Results Response rates were 55% ( n = 21) for the first survey and 42% for the second ( n = 16). In the first survey, 67% of respondents claimed familiarity with the required HPB curriculum, and 43% indicated dissatisfaction with current personal study strategies. A total of 62% ( n = 13) reported studying with focused clinical relevance versus using a prescribed curriculum ( n = 1, 5%). Fellows anticipated participating using online tools once ( n = 10, 48%) or two or three times ( n = 5, 24%) per week. Most respondents ( n = 18, 86%) would meaningfully follow one or two discussions per month. The second survey identified themes for improvement such as discussion topics of interest, avoidance of holiday timing and mandatory participation. Conclusions An international online distance learning format is an appealing mechanism for improved dissemination and operationalization of the established HPB fellow curricula. Fellows will engage in interactive discussions monthly. Controversial topics or those requiring complex decision making are best suited to this learning format.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleDevelopment of an international online learning platform for hepatopancreatobiliary surgical training: a needs assessmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSurgery and Anesthesiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109609/1/hpb12289-sup-0001-si.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109609/2/hpb12289.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/hpb.12289en_US
dc.identifier.sourceHPBen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmericas Hepato‐Pancreato‐Biliary Association. ( 2008 ) AHPBA fellows' curriculum. Available at http://www.ahpba.org/assets/fellowship/AHPBA_HPB‐Curriculum.pdf (last accessed 11 June 2014).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAustralian New Zealand Hepatic, Pancreatic and Biliary Association. ( 2009 ) ANZHPBA Fellows curriculum. Available at http://www.anzhpba.com/pdf/anzhpba‐fellowship‐hpb‐surgery.pdf (last accessed 11 June 2014).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInternational Hepato‐Pancreato‐Biliary Association. ( 2008 ) IHPBA training standards. Available at http://www.ahpba.org/assets/fellowship/IHPBA_hpb_training_standards.pdf (last accessed 11 June 2014).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuse HE. ( 2003 ) The Web‐based community college student: an examination of factors that lead to success and risk. Internet High Educ 6: 241 – 261.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSowan AK, Jenkins LS. ( 2013 ) Designing, delivering and evaluating a distance learning nursing course responsive to students' needs. Int J Med Inform 82: 553 – 564.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInternational Hepato‐Pancreato‐Biliary Association. myHPB. Available at www.ihpba.org/myhpb (last accessed 11 June 2014).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNielsen.com. January 2013: Top U.S. Entertainment Sites and Web Brands. Available at http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2013/january‐2013‐‐top‐u‐s‐‐entertainment‐sites‐and‐web‐brands.html (last accessed 11 June 2014).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSCORE Curriculum outline for General Surgery Residency. Available at http://www.absurgery.org/default.jsp?scre_booklet (last accessed 11 June 2014).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith PJ, Wigmore SJ, Paisley A, Lamb P, Richards JM, Robson AJ et al. ( 2013 ) Distance learning improves attainment of professional milestones in the early years of surgical training. Ann Surg 258: 838 – 843.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSalmon G. ( 2005 ) Flying not flapping: a strategic framework for e‐learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions. ALT‐J Res Learn Technol 13: 201 – 218.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiemens G. ( 2005 ) Connectivism: learning theory for the digital age. Int J Instr Technol Distance Learn 2: 3 – 10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConnor S. ( 2011 ) Preventing bile duct injuries. Available at http://youtu.be/UGhkI6ltAfw (last accessed 11 June 2014).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChilds S, Blenkinsopp E, Hall A, Walton G. ( 2005 ) Effective e‐learning for health professionals and students – barriers and their solutions. A systematic review of the literature – findings from the HeXL project. Health Info Libr J 22: 20 – 32.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.