Phase II trial of biweekly gemcitabine and paclitaxel with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Southwest Oncology Group study S0329
dc.contributor.author | Malhotra, Binu | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Moon, James | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kucuk, Omar | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Clark, Joseph I. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Urba, Susan G. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wolf, Gregory T. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Worden, Francis P. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-09T16:54:06Z | |
dc.date.available | WITHHELD_13_MONTHS | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-09T16:54:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-12 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Malhotra, Binu; Moon, James; Kucuk, Omar; Clark, Joseph I.; Urba, Susan G.; Wolf, Gregory T.; Worden, Francis P. (2014). "Phase II trial of biweekly gemcitabine and paclitaxel with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Southwest Oncology Group study S0329." Head & Neck 36(12): 1712-1717. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1043-3074 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1097-0347 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/109649 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background A phase I study and an institutional pilot study in patients with metastatic/recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) utilizing biweekly gemcitabine and paclitaxel (GEMTAX), showed an overall response rate of 53%. 1 This phase II trial was conducted to determine the feasibility, tolerability, and efficacy of this combination. Methods Patients with metastatic/recurrent SCCHN were treated with gemcitabine (3000 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (150 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15 of every 28‐day cycle. Results In 57 patients with measurable disease, median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 4 months and median overall survival (OS) was 8 months. Overall response rate of 28% and disease stabilization in 19% were seen. There were no treatment‐related deaths with grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity seen in 20% of the patients. Conclusion Biweekly GEMTAX is feasible, well tolerated, and demonstrated reasonable efficacy. This may be an alternative for patients who are not candidates for platinum‐based chemotherapy. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 36: 1712–1717, 2014 | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Paclitaxel | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Gemcitabine | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Recurrent | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Metastatic | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck | en_US |
dc.title | Phase II trial of biweekly gemcitabine and paclitaxel with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Southwest Oncology Group study S0329 | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Otolaryngology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109649/1/hed23522.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/hed.23522 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Head & Neck | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kaplan EL Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457 – 481. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009; 59: 225 – 249. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cohen EE, Lingen MW, Vokes EE. The expanding role of systemic therapy in head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 1743 – 1752. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Vermorken JB, Mesia R, Rivera F, et al. Platinum‐based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1116 – 1127. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gebbia V, Testa A, Cannata G, Gebbia N. Single agent paclitaxel in advanced squamous cell head and neck carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 1996; 32A: 901 – 902. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Forastiere AA, Shank D, Neuberg D, Taylor SG IV, DeConti RC, Adams G. Final report of a phase II evaluation of paclitaxel in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial (PA390). Cancer 1998; 82: 2270 – 2274. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Raguse JD, Gath HJ, Bier J, Riess H, Oettle H. Gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2005; 17: 425 – 429. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kroep JR, Giaccone G, Voorn DA, et al. Gemcitabine and paclitaxel: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 2190 – 2197. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Catimel G, Vermorken JB, Clavel M, et al. A phase II study of Gemcitabine (LY 188011) in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. EORTC Early Clinical Trials Group. Ann Oncol 1994; 5: 543 – 547. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Brown T, O'Rourke T, Burris H, et al. A phase I trial of gemcitabine (LY 188011) administered intravenously every two weeks. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1991; 10:abstract 115. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Tanis BC, Clavel M, Guastalla JP, et al. Phase I study of gemcitabine (difluorodeoxycytidine; dFdC (LY 188011)) administered in a two weekly schedule. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 1990; 31:abstract 207. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rothenberg ML, Sharma A, Weiss GR, et al. Phase I trial of paclitaxel and gemcitabine administered every two weeks in patients with refractory solid tumors. Ann Oncol 1998; 9: 733 – 738. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Alousi AM, Fontana J, Yoo G, Kim H, Jacobs JR, Kucuk O. Phase II study of GEMTAX (gemcitabine and paclitaxel) in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003; 22:abstract 2044. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 205 – 216. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Brookmeyer R, Crowley J. A confidence interval for the median survival time. Biometrics 1982; 38: 29 – 41. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Argiris A, Li Y, Forastiere A. Prognostic factors and long‐term survivorship in patients with recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer 2004; 101: 2222 – 2229. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Worden FP, Moon J, Samlowski W, et al. A phase II evaluation of a 3‐hour infusion of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and 5‐fluorouracil in patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Southwest Oncology Group study 0007. Cancer 2006; 107: 319 – 327. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Argiris A, Karamouzis MV, Gooding WE, et al. Phase II trial of pemetrexed and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 1140 – 1145. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kafri Z, Heilbrun LK, Sukari A, et al. Phase II study of gemcitabine and docetaxel combination in patients with previously treated recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. ISRN Oncol 2012; 2012: 159568. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Stier S, Koll C, Neuhaus T, et al. Gemcitabine and paclitaxel in metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase I‐II study. Anticancer Drugs 2005; 16: 1115 – 1121. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.