View Item 

Show simple item record

A Design Framework for the ELTeach Program Assessments
dc.contributor.authorYoung, John W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFreeman, Donalden_US
dc.contributor.authorHauck, Maurice C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGomez, Pablo Garciaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPapageorgiou, Spirosen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-07T15:23:53Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_12_MONTHSen_US
dc.date.available2015-01-07T15:23:53Z
dc.date.issued2014-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationYoung, John W.; Freeman, Donald; Hauck, Maurice C.; Gomez, Pablo Garcia; Papageorgiou, Spiros (2014). "A Design Framework for the ELTeach Program Assessments." ETS Research Report Series 2014(2): 1-29.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2330-8516en_US
dc.identifier.issn2330-8516en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/109937
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherEnglish‐For‐Teachingen_US
dc.subject.otherTeacher Professional Developmenten_US
dc.subject.otherELTeachen_US
dc.subject.otherTeacher Professional Knowledgeen_US
dc.subject.otherEnglish Language Teachingen_US
dc.titleA Design Framework for the ELTeach Program Assessmentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109937/1/ets212036.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ets2.12036en_US
dc.identifier.sourceETS Research Report Seriesen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMessick, S. ( 1989 ). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement ( 3rd ed., pp. 13 – 103 ). New York, NY: Macmillan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKenyon, D. M. ( 2012 ). Using Bachman's assessment use argument as a tool in conceptualizing the issues surrounding linking ACTFL and CEFR. In E. Tschirner (Ed.), Aligning frameworks of reference in language testing: The ACTFL proficiency guidelines and the common european framework of reference for languages (pp. 23 – 34 ). Tübingen, Germany: Stauffenburg Verlag.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. ( 2004 ). Test equating, linking, and scaling: Methods and practices ( 2nd ed. ). New York, NY: Springer‐Verlag.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLarsen‐Freeman, D., & Freeman, D. ( 2008 ). Language moves: The place of “foreign” languages in classroom teaching and learning. Review of Research in Education, 32 ( 1 ), 147 – 186.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMagnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. ( 1999 ). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess‐Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implication for science education (pp. 95 – 132 ). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcNamara, T. ( 2006 ). Validity in language testing: The challenge of Sam Messick's legacy. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3 ( 1 ), 31 – 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMessick, S. ( 1996 ). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13 ( 4 ), 241 – 256.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMislevy, R. J. ( 1994 ). Evidence and inference in educational assessment. Psychometrika, 59, 439 – 483.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMislevy, R. J., Almond, R. G., & Lukas, J. F. ( 2003 ). A brief introduction to evidence centered design (Research Report No. RR‐03‐16). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2003.tb01908.xen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. ( 1999 ). Evidence‐centered assessment design. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMonte‐Sano, C., & Budano, C. ( 2013 ). Developing and enacting pedagogical content knowledge for teaching history: An exploration of two novice teachers' growth over three years. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22 ( 2 ), 171 – 211.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuraki, E. ( 1992 ). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16 ( 2 ), 159 – 176.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSešek, U. ( 2007 ). English for teachers of EFL—Toward a holistic description. English for Specific Purposes, 26 ( 4 ), 411 – 425.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShulman, L. ( 1987 ). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 ( 1 ), 1 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStocking, M. L., & Lord, F. M. ( 1983 ). Developing a common metric in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7 ( 2 ), 201 – 210.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceToulmin, S. E. ( 2003 ). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurner‐Bisset, R. ( 1999 ). The knowledge bases of the expert teacher. British Educational Research Journal, 25 ( 1 ), 39 – 55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. ( 1998 ). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673 – 695.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWall, D. ( 2000 ). The impact of high‐stakes testing on teaching and learning: Can this be predicted or controlled? System, 28 ( 4 ), 499 – 509.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWall, D., & Alderson, J. C. ( 1993 ). Examining washback: The Sri Lankan impact study. Language Testing, 10 ( 1 ), 41 – 69.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, S., Shulman, L., & Richert, A. ( 1987 ). ‘150 different ways’ of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers' thinking (pp. 104 – 124 ). London, England: Cassel.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZakeri, A., & Alavi, M. ( 2011 ). English language teachers' knowledge and their self‐efficacy. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2, 413 – 419.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbell, S. K., Rogers, M. P., Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Gagnon, M. J. ( 2009 ). Preparing the next generation of science teacher educators: A model for developing PCK for teaching science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20 ( 9 ), 77 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBachman, L. F. ( 2005 ). Building and supporting a case for test use. Language Assessment Quarterly, 2 ( 1 ), 1 – 34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. ( 2010 ). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBall, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. ( 2005 ). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29, p. 4–17, 20–22, 43–46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBall, D. L., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. ( 2008 ). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59 ( 5 ), 389 – 407.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeaton, A. E., & Allen, N. L. ( 1992 ). Interpreting scales through scale anchoring. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 17, 191 – 204.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBen‐Peretz, M. ( 2011 ). Teacher knowledge: What is it? How do we uncover it? What are its implications for schooling? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 3 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBirnbaum, A. ( 1968 ). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 397 – 472 ). Reading, MA: Addison‐Wesley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceButler, Y. G. ( 2004 ). What level of English proficiency do elementary school teachers need to attain to teach EFL? Case studies from Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. TESOL Quarterly, 38 ( 2 ), 245 – 278.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceByrne, B. M. ( 2006 ). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming ( 2nd ed. ). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCizek, G. J. ( 2012 ). Defining and distinguishing validity: Interpretations of score meaning and justifications of test use. Psychological Methods, 17 ( 1 ), 31 – 43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. ( 2003 ). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25 ( 2 ), 119 – 142.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConnelly, M., & Clandinin, D. J. ( 1988 ). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConsolo, D. A. ( 2006 ). On a (re)definition of oral language proficiency for EFL teachers: Perspectives and contributions from current research. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing, 11 ( 1 ), 1 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCouncil of Europe. ( 2001 ). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCronbach, L. J. ( 1988 ). Five perspectives on validity argument. In H. Wainer & H. Braun (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 3 – 17 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDewey, J. ( 1920 ). Reconstruction in philosophy. New York, NY: Henry Holt.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDouglas, D. ( 2000 ). Assessing languages for specific purposes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDudley‐Evans, T., & St John, M. J. ( 1998 ). Developments in English for specific purposes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDudley‐Marling, C., Abt‐Perkins, D., Sato, K., & Selfe, R. ( 2006 ). Teacher quality: The perspective of NCTE members. English Education, 38, 167 – 193.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElbaz, F. ( 1983 ). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. New York, NY: Nichols.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElder, C. ( 2001 ). Assessing the language proficiency of teachers: Are there any border controls? Language Testing, 18 ( 2 ), 149 – 170.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEngestrom, Y. ( 2001 ). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14 ( 1 ), 133 – 156.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreeman, D. ( 1996 ). The ‘unstudied problem’: Research on teacher learning in language teaching. In D. Freeman & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 351 – 377 ). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreeman, D., & Johnson, K. E. ( 1998 ). Reconceptualizing the knowledge‐base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32 ( 3 ), 397 – 417.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreeman, D., Katz, A., Le Dréan, L., Burns, A., & Hauck, M. ( 2013 ). ELTeach global pilot report 2012. Retrieved from http://elteach.com/ELTeach/media/Documents/ELTeach_GPR_9‐20‐13.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGraddol, D. ( 2006 ). English next: Why global English may mean the end of ‘English as a foreign language.’ London, England: British Council.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGraddol, D. ( 2010 ). English next: India. London, England: British Council.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrossman, P. L. ( 1990 ). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaberman, S. J. ( 2006 ). An elementary test of the normal 2PL model against the normal 3PL alternative (Research Report No. RR‐06‐14). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2006.tb02020.xen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. ( 1991 ). Fundamentals of item response theory. London, England: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarris, L., & Bain, R. ( 2011 ). Pedagogical content knowledge for world history teachers: What is it? How might prospective teachers develop it? The Social Studies, 102 ( 1 ), 9 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHouse, E. R. ( 1980 ). Evaluating with validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHutchinson, T., & Waters, A. ( 1987 ). English for specific purposes: A learning‐centered approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKane, M. ( 1992 ). An argument‐based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin, 112 ( 3 ), 527 – 535.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKane, M. ( 2013 ). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50 ( 1 ), 1 – 73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKane, M. ( 2006 ). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement ( 4th ed., pp. 17 – 64 ). Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKelly, L. G. ( 1969 ). Twenty‐five centuries of language teaching. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ets212036.pdf
Size:
4.547MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.