Show simple item record

Initial External Validation of REGRESS in Public Health Graduate Students

dc.contributor.authorKidwell, Kelley M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEnders, Felicity B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-07T15:24:44Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_12_MONTHSen_US
dc.date.available2015-01-07T15:24:44Z
dc.date.issued2014-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationKidwell, Kelley M.; Enders, Felicity B. (2014). "Initial External Validation of REGRESS in Public Health Graduate Students." Clinical and Translational Science 7(6): 447-455.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1752-8054en_US
dc.identifier.issn1752-8062en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/110068
dc.description.abstractLinear regression is typically taught as a second and potentially last required (bio)statistics course for Public Health and Clinical and Translational Science students. There has been much research on the attitudes of students toward basic biostatistics, but there has not been much assessing students’ understanding of critical regression topics. The REGRESS (REsearch on Global Regression Expectations in StatisticS) quiz developed at Mayo Clinic utilizes 27 questions to assess understanding for simple and multiple linear regression. We performed an initial external validation of this tool with 117 University of Michigan public health students. We compare the results of pre‐ and postcourse quiz scores from the Michigan cohort to scores of Mayo medical students and professional statisticians. University of Michigan students performed higher than Mayo students on the precourse quiz due to previous related coursework, but did not perform as high postcourse indicating the need for course modification. In the Michigan cohort, REGRESS scores improved by a mean (standard deviation) of 4.6 (3.4), p < 0.0001. Our results support the use of the REGRESS quiz as a learning tool for students and an evaluation tool to identify topics for curricular improvement for teachers, while we highlight future directions of research.en_US
dc.publisherMcKinsey Global Instituteen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherBiostatisticsen_US
dc.subject.otherAssessmenten_US
dc.subject.otherValidationen_US
dc.subject.otherGraduate Level Statistics Courseen_US
dc.subject.otherLinear Regressionen_US
dc.titleInitial External Validation of REGRESS in Public Health Graduate Studentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPharmacy and Pharmacologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/110068/1/cts12190.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cts.12190en_US
dc.identifier.sourceClinical and Translational Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevon Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007; 335 ( 7624 ): 806 – 808.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNasser FM. Structural model of the effects of cognitive and affective factors on the achievement of Arabic‐speaking pre‐service teachers in introductory statistics. J Stat Educ [Online] 2004; 12 ( 1 ), Retrieved October 3, 2013, from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v12n1/nasser.htmlen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCashin SE, Elmore PB. The survey of attitudes toward statistics scale: a construct validity study. Educ Psychol Meas. 2005; 65 ( 3 ): 509 – 524.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTempelaar DT, Schim van der Loeff S, Gijselaers WH. A structural equation model analyzing the relationship of students' attitudes toward statistics, prior reasoning abilities, and course performance. Stat Educ Res J. 2007; 6 ( 2 ): 78 – 102.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChiesi F, Primi C. Cognitive and non‐cognitive factors related to students' statistics achievement. Stat Educ Res J. 2010; 9 ( 1 ): 6 – 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEmmiog˘lu E, Capa‐Aydin Y. Attitudes and achievement in statistics: a meta‐analysis study. Stat Educ Res J. 2012; 11 ( 2 ): 95 – 102.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencedelMas R, Garfield J, Ooms A, Chance B. Assessing students' conceptual understanding after a first course in statistics. Stat Educ Res J. 2007; 6 ( 2 ): 28 – 58. http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/∼iase/serj/SERJ6(2)_delMas.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWindish DM, Huot SJ, Green ML. Medicine residents' understanding of the biostatistics and results in the medical literature. J Am Med Assoc. 2007; 298 ( 9 ): 1010 – 1022.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEnders F. Evaluating mastery of biostatistics for medical researchers: need for a new assessment tool. Clin Trans Sci. 2011; 4: 448 – 454.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEnders F. Do clinical and translational science graduate students understand linear regression? Development and early validation of the REGRESS quiz. Clin Trans Sci. 2013: doi: 10.1111/cts.12088en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArmstrong R, Waters E, Moore L, Riggs E, Cuervo LG, Lumbiganon P, Hawe P. Improving the reporting of public health intervention research: advancing TREND and CONSORT. J Public Health. 2008; 30 ( 1 ): 103 – 109.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010; 340 ( c869 ): 1 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDes Jarlais D, Lyles C, Crepaz N, Group T. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health. 2004; 94 ( 3 ): 361 – 366.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2007; 4 ( 10 ): 1628 – 1654.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy TJ, McKnight C, Richman M, Terry R. Clicker Questions. 2009, July 29: Retrieved from http://www.ou.edu/statsclickers/clickerQuestions.htmen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeck R, Devore J. Roxy Peck's collection of classroom voting questions for statistics. 2008: Retrieved from http://mathquest.carroll.edu/resources.htmlen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUtts J. Statistics 110/201 Practice Regression Final Key. 2009 Retrieved from http://www.ics.uci.edu/∼jutts/110‐201‐09/PracticeRegressionFinalKey.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLewis A. Lecture 10: regression, correlation and acceptance sampling. 2012: Retrived from http://cosmologist.info/teaching/STAT/Statistics10.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, York University. (2005). Visualizing relations in multiple regression. Retrieved from http://www.math.yorku.ca/SCS/spida/lm/visreg.htmlen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEuropean Environment Agency. (2011, September 26). Illustration of the statistical analysis using multiple linear regression. Retrieved from http://www.eea.europa.eu/data‐and‐maps/figures/illustration‐of‐the‐statistical‐analysisen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceASPH. Annual Data Report. (2010). Washington, DC: Association of Schools of Public Health, 2010. http://www.asph.org/UserFiles/DataReport2010.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceManyika J, Chui M, Bughin J, Brown B, Dobbs R, Roxburgh C, Byers AH. Big Data: The Next Frontier for Innovation, Competition, and Productivity. McKinsey Global Institute. 2011en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHart Research Associates. 2010. Raising the Bar: Employers' Views on College Learning in the Wake of the Economic Downturn. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLohr S. For Today's graduate, just one word: Statistics, August 5, 2009. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/06/technology/06stats.html?_r = 0. Accessed October 3, 2013en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNicholson JR, Mulhern G. ( 2000 ). Conceptual challenges facing A level statistics students: Teacher and examiner perspectives. Papers on Teaching and Learning Statistics –ICME9. http://iase‐web.org/documents/papers/icme9/ICME9_03.pdf. Assessed February 26, 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElmore P, Vasu ES. Relationship between selected variables and statistics achievement: building a theoretical model. J Educ Psychol. 1980; 72 ( 4 ): 457 – 467.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElmore P, Vasu ES. A model of statistics achievement using spatial ability, feminist attitudes and mathematics‐related variables as predictors. Educ Psychol Meas. 1986; 46 ( 1 ): 215 – 222.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchau C, Stevens J, Dauphinee TL, Del Vecchio A. The development and validation of the survey of attitudes toward statistics. Educ Psychol Meas. 1995; 55: 868 – 875.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchram CM. A meta‐analysis of gender differences in applied statistics achievement. J Educ Behav Stat. 1996; 21 ( 1 ): 55 – 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTremblay PF, Gardner RC, Heipel G. A model of the relationships among measures of affect, aptitude, and performance in introductory statistics, Can J Behav Sci. 2000; 32 ( 1 ): 40 – 48.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaloglu M. Individual differences in statistics anxiety among college students. Personal Indiv Differ. 2003; 34 ( 5 ): 855 – 865.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBandalos DL, Finney SJ, Geske JA. A model of statistics performance based on achievement goal theory. J Educ Psychol. 2003; 95 ( 3 ): 604 – 616.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.