View Item 

Show simple item record

Integrating the Use of Patient‐Reported Outcomes for Both Clinical Practice and Performance Measurement: Views of Experts from 3 Countries
dc.contributor.authorVan Der Wees, Philip J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNijhuis‐van Der Sanden, Maria W.g.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAyanian, John Z.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBlack, Nicken_US
dc.contributor.authorWestert, Gert P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Eric C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-07T15:24:47Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_12_MONTHSen_US
dc.date.available2015-01-07T15:24:47Z
dc.date.issued2014-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationVan Der Wees, Philip J. ; Nijhuis‐van Der Sanden, Maria W.g. ; Ayanian, John Z. ; Black, Nick ; Westert, Gert P. ; Schneider, Eric C. (2014). "Integrating the Use of Patientâ Reported Outcomes for Both Clinical Practice and Performance Measurement: Views of Experts from 3 Countries." Milbank Quarterly 92(4): 754-775.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0887-378Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1468-0009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/110074
dc.publisherNational Quality Forum (NQF)en_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherPerformance Measurementen_US
dc.subject.otherPatient‐Reported Outcomesen_US
dc.subject.otherHealth Care Policyen_US
dc.subject.otherQuality of Careen_US
dc.titleIntegrating the Use of Patient‐Reported Outcomes for Both Clinical Practice and Performance Measurement: Views of Experts from 3 Countriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/110074/1/milq12091.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1468-0009.12091en_US
dc.identifier.sourceMilbank Quarterlyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuncan EA, Murray J. The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12: 96.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKUR. Swedish Clinical Registries (KUR): outcome registries to drive development of value guided health care. http://www.kurnet.se/english/. Accessed October 2, 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiletus. Stichting Miletus. http://www.stichtingmiletus.nl/. Accessed March 27, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDevlin NJ, Appleby J. Getting the Most out of PROMS: Putting Health Outcomes at the Heart of NHS Decision‐Making. London: King's Fund; 2010.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFleuren M, Wiefferink K, Paulussen T. Determinants of innovation within health care organizations: literature review and Delphi study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004; 16 ( 2 ): 107 ‐ 123.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHildon Z, Allwood D, Black N. Patients’ and clinicians’ views of comparing the performance of providers of surgery: a qualitative study. Health Expect. December 20, 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15 ( 9 ): 1277 ‐ 1288.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrol R, Wensing M, Eccles MDD. Improving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Clinical Practice. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDepartment of Health. Patient Reported Outcome Measures in England: A Methodology for Identifying Outliers. London: Department of Health; 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaker DW, Qaseem A, Reynolds PP, Gardner LA, Schneider EC. Design and use of performance measures to decrease low‐value services and achieve cost‐conscious care. Ann Intern Med. 2013; 158 ( 1 ): 55 ‐ 59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQaseem A, Snow V, Gosfield A, et al. Pay for performance through the lens of medical professionalism. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152 ( 6 ): 366 ‐ 369.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyce MB, Browne JP, Greenhalgh J. The experiences of professionals with using information from patient‐reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ Qual Saf. February 6, 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValderas JM, Kotzeva A, Espallargues M, et al. The impact of measuring patient‐reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2008; 17 ( 2 ): 179 ‐ 193.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyce MB, Browne JP. Does providing feedback on patient‐reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2013; 22 ( 9 ): 2265 ‐ 2278.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKotronoulas G, Kearney N, Maguire R, et al. What is the value of the routine use of patient‐reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32 ( 14 ): 1480 ‐ 1501.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVaragunam M, Hutchings A, Neuburger J, Black N. Impact on hospital performance of introducing routine patient reported outcome measures in surgery. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2014; 19 ( 2 ): 77 ‐ 84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyce MB, Browne JP, Greenhalgh J. Surgeon's experiences of receiving peer benchmarked feedback using patient‐reported outcome measures: a qualitative study. Implement Sci. 2014; 9: 84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedberg MW, Steel Fisher GK, Karp M, Schneider EC. Physician groups’ use of data from patient experience surveys. J Gen Intern Med. 2011; 26 ( 5 ): 498 ‐ 504.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenhalgh J, Pawson R, Wright J, et al. Functionality and feedback: a protocol for a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of PROMs data to improve patient care. BMJ Open. 2014; 4 ( 7 ): e005601.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHSCIC. Patient Reports Outcome Measures: PROMs publications. www.hscic.gov.uk/proms. Accessed November 12, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYHQO. Quarterly PROMs Report. York: Yorkshire and the Humber Quality Observatory; 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNHS‐Eastern‐Cheshire. Outcomes Benchmarking Support Pack: CCG Level. Manchester: NHS Eastern Cheshire; 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBasch E, Torda P, Adams K. Standards for patient‐reported outcome‐based performance measures. JAMA. 2013; 310 ( 2 ): 139 ‐ 140.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAhmed S, Berzon RA, Revicki DA, et al. The use of patient‐reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy. Med Care. 2012; 50 ( 12 ): 1060 ‐ 1070.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSelby JV, Beal AC, Frank L. The Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. JAMA. 2012; 307 ( 15 ): 1583 ‐ 1584.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReuben DB, Tinetti ME. Goal‐oriented patient care—an alternative health outcomes paradigm. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366 ( 9 ): 777 ‐ 779.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChaudry H, Rhyne J, Waters S, Cain FE, Talmage L. Maintenance of licensure: evolving from framework to implementation. J Med Regul. 2012; 97 ( 4 ): 8 ‐ 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlack N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ. 2013; 346: f167.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWu AW, Kharrazi H, Boulware LE, Snyder CF. Measure once, cut twice—adding patient‐reported outcome measures to the electronic health record for comparative effectiveness research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013; 66 (Suppl. 8): S12 ‐ S20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCella D, Hahn EA, Jensen SE, Butt Z, Nowinski J, Rothrock N. Methodological Issues in the Selection, Administration and Use of Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Perfomance Measurement in Health Care Settings. Washington, DC: National Quality Forum (NQF); 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWare JE Jr, Kosinski M, Gandek B, et al. The factor structure of the SF‐36 Health Survey in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998; 51 ( 11 ): 1159 ‐ 1165.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePROMIS. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. http://www.nihpromis.org/about/overview. Accessed October 15, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeutsch A, Gage B, Smith L, Kelleher C. Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Performance Measurement. Washington, DC: National Quality Forum (NQF); 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan der Wees PJ, Nijhuis‐van der Sanden MW, van Ginneken E, Ayanian JZ, Schneider EC, Westert GP. Governing healthcare through performance measurement in Massachusetts and the Netherlands. Health Policy. 2014; 116 ( 1 ): 18 ‐ 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedberg MW, Coltin KL, Safran DG, Dresser M, Zaslavsky AM, Schneider EC. Associations between structural capabilities of primary care practices and performance on selected quality measures. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151 ( 7 ): 456 ‐ 463.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSequist TD, Schneider EC, Li A, Rogers WH, Safran DG. Reliability of medical group and physician performance measurement in the primary care setting. Med Care. 2011; 49 ( 2 ): 126 ‐ 131.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlack N. Time for a new approach to assessing the quality of hospitals in England. BMJ. 2013; 347: f4421.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNQF. Patient‐Reported Outcomes (PROs) in performance measurement. http://www.qualityforum.org/Projects/n‐r/Patient‐Reported_Outcomes/Patient‐Reported_Outcomes.aspx. Accessed September 15 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBasch E, Goertz C, Adams Dudley R, et al. Standards for Developing and Evaluating Patient‐Reported Outcome (PRO) Performance Measures. Chicago, IL: Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement (PCPI); 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Beurs E, den Hollander‐Gijsman ME, van Rood YR, et al. Routine outcome monitoring in the Netherlands: practical experiences with a web‐based strategy for the assessment of treatment outcome in clinical practice. Clin psychol psychother. 2011; 18 ( 1 ): 1 ‐ 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNelson EC, Hvitfeldt H, Reid R, et al. Using Patient‐Reported Information to Improve Health Outcomes and Health Care Value: Case Studies from Dartmouth, Karolinska and Group Health. Lebanon, NH: Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice; 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrowne J, Jamieson L, Lewsey J. et al. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Elective Surgery: Report to the Department of Health. London: Health Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine & Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England; 2007.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones N, Jones SL, Miller NA. The Medicare Health Outcomes Survey program: overview, context, and near‐term prospects. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004; 2: 33.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
milq12091.pdf
Size:
152.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.