Show simple item record

Cognitive Function in Post-Menopausal Women with Breast Cancer Treated with Aromatase Inhibitors.

dc.contributor.authorClark, Patricia M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-30T20:11:13Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2015-01-30T20:11:13Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.date.submitted2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/110367
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Cognitive function changes reported as distressing by women diagnosed with breast cancer have been of interest to clinicians and researchers. The majority of post-menopausal women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer are treated with anti-estrogen therapies, usually aromatase inhibitors (AI). Estrogen is essential for brain function that supports everyday activities requiring cognitive functions of controlled attention and working and verbal memory. Post-menopausal breast cancer survivors are vulnerable to age-related cognitive decline which may be compounded by treatment-associated estrogen deprivation adversely affecting their roles at home, work, school, and society. This study explored effects of AI therapy on cognitive function in post-menopausal women treated for early stage breast cancer. The biological theory of treatment-associated estrogen deprivation was linked to neurobehavioral theory underlying basic cognitive processes of controlled attention and working and verbal memory. Methods: Fifty post-menopausal women, 21 with breast cancer treated with AI, 10 with breast cancer receiving no AI, and 19 healthy controls were enrolled in this longitudinal, non-randomized, comparative study. Established neuropsychological measures (Digit Span, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Attention Network Test) and self-report of cognitive function (Attentional Function Index) were administered at two time points coincident with pre-AI and 3 months of AI therapy. Comparative and repeated measures statistics were used to examine between and within group changes over time. Results: The AI group perceived worsening of cognitive function with more attentional lapses after three months of AI therapy in contrast to improvement in objective cognitive measures. There were no significant differences between AI and non-AI groups in objective or subjective measures of cognitive function. In comparison to healthy controls, the AI group demonstrated greater difficulty in high demand attention and working memory tasks. Similar group differences were noted in perceived cognitive function with greatest differences between the AI and healthy groups. The AI group perceived more attentional lapse over time than healthy controls. Conclusion: Post-menopausal breast cancer survivors treated with AI perceive cognitive decline despite objective improvement in attention and working memory. Nurses are instrumental in supporting these women and helping them to recognize and manage effects of cognitive decline in everyday life.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectnursingen_US
dc.subjectcognitive functionen_US
dc.subjectbreast canceren_US
dc.titleCognitive Function in Post-Menopausal Women with Breast Cancer Treated with Aromatase Inhibitors.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNursingen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberCimprich, Bernadine E.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberBecker, Jill B.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberTherrien, Barbara A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSchott, Anne F.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNursingen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/110367/1/clarkpat_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.