Show simple item record

Prisoner Reentry, Parole Violations, and the Persistence of the Surveillance State.

dc.contributor.authorSiegel, Jonah Aaronen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-30T20:12:00Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2015-01-30T20:12:00Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/110423
dc.description.abstractThe revolving door of the state and federal prison system may be the most persistent challenge faced by criminological practitioners and scholars. Following release from custody, the majority of former prisoners end up back in the system within three years, suggesting that correctional involvement is not an isolated incident for most offenders. Through its analysis of parole violations and sanctions, the current dissertation project offers important new insights on this “revolving door” between prisons and high-risk communities. To do so, each of three empirical chapters looks at a different phase in the cycle of recidivism: offending behavior, institutional responses to offending behavior, and the consequences of institutional sanctions for offenders’ well-being. The first analytic chapter examines how geographical proximity to social service providers is related to the risk of recidivism. The findings suggest that the observed impact of contextual conditions on recidivism depends on how expansively one defines the “community” in which parolees are embedded and further demonstrates the importance of capturing the effect of service accessibility on offending behavior within the larger ecological context of where parolees live. The second analytic chapter explores how “supervision regimes,” the legal, political, and cultural factors that shape the way supervision is practiced across jurisdictions, influence the risk of recidivism. The analysis demonstrates that regional and county-level attributes shape local templates for decisionmaking among parole officers in ways that affect not only whether parolees are revoked to prison, but also the use of alternative sanctions, such as stricter community supervision and incarceration in short-term correctional facilities such as jails or detention centers. The final analytic chapter offers a rigorous assessment of the causal impact of incarceration on labor market outcomes through an examination of whether return to short-term custody interferes with the ability of parolees to find and maintain work. Findings indicate that the experience of short-term re-incarceration dramatically increases the risk of unemployment among parolees in the months during and following their incarceration. Taken as a whole, the analyses shed light on how offending behavior, institutional decision-making, and the experience of incarceration combine to perpetuate the cycle of recidivism.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectprisoner reentryen_US
dc.subjectrecidivismen_US
dc.subjectcommunity correctionsen_US
dc.subjectback-end sentencingen_US
dc.subjectunemploymenten_US
dc.titlePrisoner Reentry, Parole Violations, and the Persistence of the Surveillance State.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSocial Work and Sociologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberMorenoff, Jeffrey D.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberDanziger, Sandra K.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberRyan, Joseph P.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberHarding, David Jamesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberGrengs, Joseph D.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Worken_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSociologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/110423/1/siegelja_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.