Show simple item record

Hospitalization Costs for Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States Are Substantially Higher Than Medicare Payments

dc.contributor.authorAfana, Majeden_US
dc.contributor.authorBrinjikji, Waleeden_US
dc.contributor.authorCloft, Harryen_US
dc.contributor.authorSalka, Sameren_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-19T15:40:13Z
dc.date.available2016-03-02T19:36:56Zen
dc.date.issued2015-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationAfana, Majed; Brinjikji, Waleed; Cloft, Harry; Salka, Samer (2015). "Hospitalization Costs for Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States Are Substantially Higher Than Medicare Payments." Clinical Cardiology 38(1): 13-19.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0160-9289en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-8737en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/110534
dc.description.abstractBackgroundAcute coronary syndromes account for half of all deaths secondary to cardiovascular disease and represent a significant economic burden in the United States. Therefore, assessing hospitalization costs relative to Medicare reimbursement for these patients is important in understanding the impact of these patients on hospitals. We hypothesized that hospitalization costs for acute myocardial infarction patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were higher than their associated Medicare payments.MethodsUsing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we evaluated hospitalization costs for patients treated with PCI from 2001 through 2009 by multiplying hospital charges by the group average cost‐to‐charge ratio for each patient's hospitalization. Primary end points examined were total hospital costs and trends over time, which were correlated with clinical outcomes and insurance payments. Costs were inflation adjusted with 2009 as the reference year.ResultsMedian hospitalization costs of PCI increased from $15 889 (interquartile range [IQR] = $12 057–$21 204) in 2001 to $19 349 (IQR = $14 660–$26 282) in 2009. From 2004 to 2009, inflation‐adjusted costs for PCI decreased at a rate of 0.3% per year. In 2009, a total of 265,531 patients received PCI for acute myocardial infarction. Of these, 143 654 were <65 years old, and 121 876 were ≥65 years old. Average 2009 Medicare payments ranged from $9303 to $17 500 depending on the Medicare Severity‐Diagnosis Related Groups (MS‐DRG) billed, leaving hospitals at a loss of anywhere from $4493 to $7940 per patient when comparing costs and reimbursements across all included MS‐DRG codes.ConclusionsHospitalization costs for patients treated with PCI have been stabilizing over the last few years; however, there still remains a significant disparity between Medicare reimbursements and hospitalization costs, which has potential implications on patient outcomes, quality of care, and hospital sustainability.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleHospitalization Costs for Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States Are Substantially Higher Than Medicare Paymentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialitiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/110534/1/clc22341.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/clc.22341en_US
dc.identifier.sourceClinical Cardiologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCommittee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health. The estimated effect of the Affordable Care Act on Medicare and Medicaid outlays and total national health care expenditures. Washington, DC: US House of Representatives; 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVenkitachalam L, Lei Y, Stolker JM, et al. Clinical and economic outcomes of liberal versus selective drug‐eluting stent use: insights from temporal analysis of the multicenter Evaluation of Drug Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events (EVENT) registry. Circulation. 2011; 124: 1028 – 1037.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrinjikji W, Kallmes DF, Lanzino G, et al. Hospitalization costs for endovascular and surgical treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in the United States are substantially higher than Medicare payments. Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 33: 49 – 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrinjikji W, Kallmes DF, Rabinstein AA, et al. Hospitalization costs for patients, with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular embolectomy in the United States. Stroke. 2011; 42: 3271 – 3273.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShen YC, Wu VY. Reductions in Medicare payments and patient outcomes: an analysis of 5 leading Medicare conditions. Med Care. 2013; 51: 970 – 977.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWu VY, Shen YC. The long‐term impact of Medicare payment reductions on patient outcomes. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBazzoli GJ, Lindrooth RC, Hasnain‐Wynia R, et al. The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 and U.S. hospital operations. Inquiry. 2004; 41: 401 – 417.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBazzoli G, Clement J, Lindrooth R, et al. Hospital financial condition and operational decisions related to the quality of hospital care. Med Care Res Rev. 2007; 64: 148 – 168.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBazzoli G, Chen H, Zhao M, et al. Hospital financial condition and quality of patient care. Health Econ. 2008; 17: 977 – 995.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite C, Wu VY. How do hospitals cope with sustained slow growth in Medicare prices? Health Serv Res. 2014; 49: 11 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVolpp KG, Konetzka RT, Zhu J, et al. Effect of cuts in Medicare reimbursement on process and outcome of care for acute myocardial infarction patients. Circulation. 2005; 112: 2268 – 2275.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeshamani M, Schwartz JS, Volpp KG. The effect of cuts in Medicare reimbursement on hospital mortality. Health Serv Res. 2006; 41 ( 3 part 1 ): 683 – 700.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThorpe KE, Howard D. Health insurance and spending among cancer patients. Health Aff. 2003; 3: 189 – 198.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEleid M, Rihal C, Gulati R, et al. Systematic use of transradial PCI in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction: a call to “arms.” JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 6: 1145 – 1148.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKomocsi A, Aradi D, Kehl D, et al. Meta‐analysis of randomized trials on access site selection for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST‐segment elevation myocardial Infarction. Arch Med Sci. 2014; 10: 203 – 212.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSafley DM, Amin AP, House JA, et al. Comparison of costs between transradial and transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention: a cohort analysis from the Premier research database. Am Heart J. 2013; 165: 303 – 309.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmin AP, House JA, Safley DM, et al. Costs of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 6: 827 – 834.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceApplegate R, Sacrinty M, Schafer P, et al. Cost effectiveness of radial access for diagnostic cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 82: E375 – E384.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKochanek KD, Xu JQ, Murphy SL, et al. Deaths: preliminary data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011; 59: 1 – 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKolansky DM. Acute coronary syndromes: morbidity, mortality, and pharmacoeconomic burden. Am J Manag Care. 2009; 15: S36 – S41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Nationwide Inpatient Sample. 2001‐2009. http://www.hcup‐us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp. (accessed December 31, 2012).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Cost‐to‐charge ratio files. August 2011. http://www.hcup‐us.ahrq.gov/db/state/costtocharge.jsp. (accessed December 31, 2012).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRiley RF, Don CW, Powell W, et al. Trends in coronary revascularization in the United States from 2001 to 2009: recent declines in percutaneous coronary intervention volumes. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011; 4: 193 – 197.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhao Z, Winget M. Economic burden of illness of acute coronary syndromes: medical and productivity costs. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011; 11: 35.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRyan J, Linde‐Zwirble W, Engelhart L, et al. Temporal changes in coronary revascularization procedures, outcomes, and costs in the bare‐metal stent and drug‐eluting stent eras: results from the U.S. Medicare program. Circulation. 2009; 119: 952 – 961.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.