Show simple item record

Integrating Spatial Data Linkage and Analysis Services in a Geoportal for China Urban Research

dc.contributor.authorZhu, Xinyanen_US
dc.contributor.authorShe, Bingen_US
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Weien_US
dc.contributor.authorBao, Shumingen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Dien_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-05T18:24:36Z
dc.date.available2016-04-01T15:21:06Zen
dc.date.issued2015-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationZhu, Xinyan; She, Bing; Guo, Wei; Bao, Shuming; Chen, Di (2015). "Integrating Spatial Data Linkage and Analysis Services in a Geoportal for China Urban Research." Transactions in GIS (1): 107-128.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1361-1682en_US
dc.identifier.issn1467-9671en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/110740
dc.description.abstractMany geoportals are now evolving into online analytical environments, where large amounts of data and various analysis methods are integrated. These spatiotemporal data are often distributed in different databases and exist in heterogeneous forms, even when they refer to the same geospatial entities. Besides, existing open standards lack sufficient expression of the attribute semantics. Client applications or other services thus have to deal with unrelated preprocessing tasks, such as data transformation and attribute annotation, leading to potential inconsistencies. Furthermore, to build informative interfaces that guide users to quickly understand the analysis methods, an analysis service needs to explicitly model the method parameters, which are often interrelated and have rich auxiliary information. This work presents the design of the spatial data linkage and analysis services in a geoportal for China urban research. The spatial data linkage service aggregates multisource heterogeneous data into linked layers with flexible attribute mapping, providing client applications and services with a unified access as if querying a big table. The spatial analysis service incorporates parameter hierarchy and grouping by extending the standard WPS service, and data‐dependent validation in computation components. This platform can help researchers efficiently explore and analyze spatiotemporal data online.en_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleIntegrating Spatial Data Linkage and Analysis Services in a Geoportal for China Urban Researchen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeological Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/110740/1/tgis12084.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/tgis.12084en_US
dc.identifier.sourceTransactions in GISen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinnott R O, Galang G, Tomko M, and Stimson R 2011 Towards an e‐infrastructure for urban research across Australia. In Proceedings of the IEEE e‐Science Conference, Stockholm, Sweden: 295 – 302en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRey S J 2009 Show me the code: Spatial analysis and open source. Journal of Geographical Systems 11: 191 – 207en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRey S J and Anselin L 2010 PySAL: A Python library of spatial analytical methods. In Fischer M M and Getis A (eds) Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis, Berlin, Springer: 175 – 193en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchut P and Whiteside A 2007 OpenGIS Web Processing Service. Wayland, MA, OGC Project Documenten_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShe B, Zhu X, and Xiao W 2012 Building an integrated web‐based environment for exploratory spatiotemporal data analysis. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing, and Spatial Information Science I‐4: 169 – 174en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStadler C, Lehmann J, Höffner K, and Auer S 2012 LinkedGeoData: A core for a web of spatial open data. Semantic Web 3: 333 – 354en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStevens S S 1946 On the theory of scales of measurement. Science 103 ( 2684 ): 677 – 680en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTakatsuka M and Gahegan M 2002 GeoVISTA Studio: A codeless visual programming environment for geoscientific data analysis and visualization. Computers and Geosciences 28: 1131 – 1144en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTomko M, Greenwood P, Sarwar M, Morandini L, Stimson R, Bayliss C, Galang G, Nino‐Ruiz M, Voorsluys W, Widjaja I, Koetsier G, Mannix D, Pettit C, and Sinnott R 2012 The design of a flexible web‐based analytical platform for urban research. In Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, Redondo Beach, California: 369 – 375en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUrbanek S 2003 Rserve: A fast way to provide R functionality to applications. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Ccomputing (DSC 2003), Vienna, Austriaen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValentine D, Taylor P and Zaslavsky I 2012 WaterML, an information standard for the exchange of in‐situ hydrological observations. In Proceedings of the European Geosciences Union General Assembly, Vienna, Austria: 13275en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVivid Solutions 2013 JTS Topology Suite. WWW document, http://www.vividsolutions.com/jts/JTSHome.htmen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang S 2010 A CyberGIS framework for the synthesis of cyberinfrastructure, GIS, and spatial analysis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100: 535 – 557en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang S, Wilkins‐Diehr N R, and Nyerges T L 2012 CyberGIS: Toward synergistic advancement of cyberinfrastructure and GIScience: A workshop summary. Journal of Spatial Information Science 4: 125 – 148en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWinkler W E 2006 Overview of Record Linkage and Current Research Directions. Washington, DC, US Bureau of the Census Technical Report Statistical Research Report Series RRS2006/02en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYang C, Raskin R, Goodchild M, and Gahegan M 2010 Geospatial Cyberinfrastructure: Past, present and future. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 34: 264 – 277en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYue P, Gong J, Di L, Yuan J, Sun L, Sun Z and Wang Q 2010 GeoPW: Laying blocks for the geospatial processing web. Transactions in GIS 14: 755 – 772en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYue P, Wei Y, Di L, He L, Gong J, and Zhang L 2011 Sharing geospatial provenance in a service‐oriented environment. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 35: 333 – 343en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhang C, Zhao T, Li W, and Osleeb J P 2010 Towards logic‐based geospatial feature discovery and integration using web feature service and geospatial semantic web. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 24: 903 – 923en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmirian P, Alesheikh A A, and Bassiri A 2010 Standards‐based, interoperable services for accessing urban services data for the city of Tehran. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 34: 309 – 321en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndrienko G, Andrienko N, Demsar U, Dransch D, Dykes J, Fabrikant S I, Jern M, Kraak M‐J, Schumann H, and Tominski C 2010 Space, time and visual analytics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 24: 1577 – 1600en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndrienko N and Andrienko G 2006 Exploratory Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Data. Berlin, Springeren_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnselin L 1995 Local Indicators of Spatial Association – LISA. Geographical Analysis 27: 93 – 115en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnselin L, Kim Y W, and Syabri I 2004 Web‐based analytical tools for the exploration of spatial data. Journal of Geographical Systems 6: 197 – 218en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnselin L and Rey S J 2012 Spatial econometrics in an age of CyberGIScience. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 26: 2211 – 2226en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAuer T, MacEachren A M, McCabe C, Pezanowski S, and Stryker M 2011 HerbariaViz: A web‐based client–server interface for mapping and exploring flora observation data. Ecological Informatics 6: 93 – 110en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBatcheller J K and Reitsma F 2010 Implementing feature level semantics for spatial data discovery: Supporting the reuse of legacy data using open source components. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 34: 333 – 344en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerkley C, Bowers S, Jones M B, Ludäscher B, Schildhauer M, and Tao J 2005 Incorporating semantics inscientific workflow authoring. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, Berkeley, California: 75 – 78en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristen P 2008 Automatic record linkage using seeded nearest neighbour and support vector machine classification. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Las Vegas, Nevada: 151 – 159en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceData Numerica Institute 2012 StatGL Graphical Library: A foundation for online graphical data analysis. WWW document, http://datanumerica.com/StatGL.htmlen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeelman E, Gannon D, Shields M, and Taylor I 2009 Workflows and e‐Science: An overview of workflow system features and capabilities. Future Generation Computer Systems 25: 528 – 540en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeoliveira J 2008 GeoServer: Uniting the GeoWeb and spatial data infrastructures. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference for Spatial Data Infrastructure, St. Augustine, Trinidaden_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFonseca F T, Egenhofer M J, Agouris P, and Câmara G 2002 Using ontologies for integrated geographic information systems. Transactions in GIS 6: 231 – 257en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrew J and Bose R 2001 Earth System Science Workbench: A data management infrastructure for earth science products. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM 2001), Fairfax, Virginia: 180 – 189en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrew J, Freeston M, Freitas N, Hill L, Janée G, Lovette K, Nideffer R, Smith T, and Zheng Q 2000 The Alexandria digital library architecture. International Journal on Digital Libraries 2: 259 – 268en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFry R, Berry R, Higgs G, Orford S, and Jones S 2012 The WISERD Geoportal: A tool for the discovery, analysis and visualization of socio‐economic (meta‐) data for Wales. Transactions in GIS 16: 105 – 124en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGhaemi P, Swift J, Sister C, Wilson J P, and Wolch J 2009 Design and implementation of a web‐based platform to support interactive environmental planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 33: 482 – 491en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGil Y, Deelman E, Ellisman M, Fahringer T, Fox G, Gannon D, Goble C, Livny M, Moreau L, and Myers J 2007 Examining the challenges of scientific workflows. Computer 40 ( 12 ): 24 – 32en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGil Y, Ratnakar V, and Fritz C 2010 Assisting scientists with complex data analysis tasks through semantic workflows. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Proactive Assistant Agents, Arlington, Virginiaen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGil Y, Ratnakar V, Kim J, González‐Calero P, Groth P, Moody J, and Deelman E 2011 Wings: Intelligent workflow‐based design of computational experiments. Intelligent Systems 26 ( 1 ): 62 – 72en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoodchild M, Buttenfield B, Adler P, Krygiel A, Onsrud H, and Kahn R 1999 Distributed Geolibraries. Washington, DC, National Academies Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoodchild M F 2007 Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69: 211 – 221en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHert M, Reif G and Gall H C 2011 A comparison of RDB‐to‐RDF mapping languages. In Proceedings of the Seventh ACM International Conference on Semantic Systems, Graz, Austria: 25 – 32en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHey T and Trefethen A E 2005 Cyberinfrastructure for e‐Science. Science 308 ( 5723 ): 817 – 821en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHo Q, Lundblad P, Åström T, and Jern M 2012 A web‐enabled visualization toolkit for geovisual analytics. Information Visualization 11 ( 1 ): 22 – 42en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKumar V, Kurc T, Ratnakar V, Kim J, Mehta G, Vahi K, Nelson Y, Sadayappan P, Deelman E, Gil Y, Hall M, and Saltz J 2010 Parameterized specification, configuration and execution of data‐intensive scientific workflows. Cluster Computing 13: 315 – 333en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi S, Xiong C, and Ou Z 2011 A Web GIS for sea ice information and an ice service archive. Transactions in GIS 15: 189 – 211en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacEachren A M, Crawford S, Akella M, and Lengerich G 2008 Design and implementation of a model, Web‐based, GIS‐enabled cancer atlas. Cartographic Journal 45: 246 – 260en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMomjian B 2001 PostgreSQL: Introduction and Concepts. New York, Addison‐Wesleyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoreno‐Sanchez R, Anderson G, Cruz J, and Hayden M 2007 The potential for the use of Open Source Software and Open Specifications in creating Web‐based cross‐border health spatial information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21: 1135 – 1163en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOGC 2012a OGC GeoSPARQL‐A Geographic Query Language for RDF Data. Wayland, MA, OGC Candidate Implementation Standarden_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOGC 2012b OGC® Geography Markup Language (GML): Extended Schemas and Encoding Rules. Wayland, MA, OGC Implementation Standarden_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePettit C, Widjaja I, Russo P, Sinnott R, Stimson R, and Tomko M 2012 Visualisation support for exploring urban space and place. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing, and Spatial Information Science I‐2: 153 – 158en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePostGIS 2013 About PostGIS. WWW document, http://postgis.net/en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR Development Core Team 2011 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computingen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.