View Item 

Show simple item record

Comprehensive Clinical Assessment in Community Setting: Applicability of the MDS‐HC
dc.contributor.authorMorris, John N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFries, Brant E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSteel, Knighten_US
dc.contributor.authorIkegami, Naokien_US
dc.contributor.authorBernabei, Robertoen_US
dc.contributor.authorCarpenter, G. Iainen_US
dc.contributor.authorGilgen, Ruedien_US
dc.contributor.authorHirdes, John P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTopinková, Evaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-04T20:35:58Z
dc.date.available2015-05-04T20:35:58Z
dc.date.issued1997-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationMorris, John N.; Fries, Brant E.; Steel, Knight; Ikegami, Naoki; Bernabei, Roberto; Carpenter, G. Iain; Gilgen, Ruedi; Hirdes, John P.; Topinková, Eva (1997). "Comprehensive Clinical Assessment in Community Setting: Applicability of the MDSâ HC." Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 45(8).en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-8614en_US
dc.identifier.issn1532-5415en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/111099
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleComprehensive Clinical Assessment in Community Setting: Applicability of the MDS‐HCen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeriatricsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Gerontology and School of Public Health, University of Michigan and VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Postgraduate School of Medicine, Czech Republic.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHebrew Rehabilitation Center for Aged, HRCA Research and Training Institute, Boston, Massachusettsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNew Jersey Medical School, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackcnsack, New Jerseyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japanen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia “Agostino Gemelli”, Rome, Italyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCenter for Health Service Studies, The University of Kent, Canterbury, Great Britainen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherKlinik fur Geriatrie und Rehabilitation, Zurich, Switzerlanden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, and Canadian Collaborating Centre — interRAI Providence Centre, Scarborough, Ontarioen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/111099/1/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02975.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02975.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of the American Geriatrics Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerrucci L, Guralnik JM, Baroni A et al. Value of combined assessment of physical health and functional status in community‐dwelling aged: A prospective study in Florence, Italy. J Gerontol 1991; 46: M52 – 56.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubenstein, LZ, Wieland D, Bernabei R. Geriatric Assessment Technologies: The State of the Art. Milan: Kurtis, 1995.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorris JN, Hawes C, Fries BE et al. Designing the national resident assessment instrument for nursing homes. Gerontologist 1990; 30: 293 – 307.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHawes C, Morris JN, Phillips CD et al. Reliability estimates for the minimum data set for nursing home residents and care screening (MDS). Gerontologist 1995; 35: 172 – 178.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorris JN, Murphy K, Nonemaker S. Long term care resident assessment instrument user's manual, version 2.0. Washington, DC: American Health Care Association, 1995.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorris JN, Nonemaker S, Murphy K, et al. A commitment to change: Revision of HCFA's RAI. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45: 1011 – 1016.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVladek B. From the Health Care Financing Administration. JAMA, 1996; 275: 425.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhillips CD, Morris JN, Hawes C et al. Association of the resident assessment instrument (RAI) with changes in function, cognition, and psychosocial status. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45: 986 – 993.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMor V, Lntrator O, Fries BE, et al. Changes in hospitalization associated with introducing the RAI. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45: 1002 – 1010.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChallis DJ, Carpenter GI, Traskc KJ. Assessment in continuing care homes: Towards a national standard instrument. Canterbury: Joseph Rowntree Foundation/Personal Social Services Research Unit, 1996.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubenstein LZ, Aronow HU, Schloe M, et al. A home‐based geriatric assessment, followup and health promotion program: Design methods and baseline findings from a 3‐year randomized clinical trial. Aging Clin Exp Res 1994; 6: 105 – 120.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubenstein LZ, Siu AL, Wieland D. Impacts of geriatric evaluation and management programs on defined outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 8 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD et al. Effects of comprehensive geriatric assessment on survival, residence, and function: A metal analysis of controlled trials. Lancet 1993; 342: 1032 – 1036.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSilverman M, Musa D, Martin DC et al. Evaluation of outpatient geriatric assessment: A randomized multi‐site trial, J Am Geriatr Soc 1995; 43: 733 – 740.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStuck AE, Aronow HU, Steiner A et al. Trial of annual in‐home comprehensive geriatric assessments for elderly people living the community. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1184 – 1189.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHirdes, JP, Naus, PJ, Young JE. The use of preventive home visits among frail elderly persons: Evidence from three European countries. Can J Aging 1994; 13: 499 – 509.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceApplegare WB, Blass JP, Williams TF. Instruments for the functional assessment of older patients. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 207 – 1214.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrandeis GH, Ooi WL, Hossain M et al. A longitudinal study of risk factors associated with the formation of pressure ulcers in nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994; 42: 388 – 393.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLipsitz LA, Jonsson PV, Kelley MM, Koestncr JS. Causes and correlates of recurrent falls in ambulatory frail elderly. J Gerontol: Med Sci, 1991; 46: M114 – 122.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTinetti ME, Inouye SK, Gill TM, Doucette JT. Shared risk factors for falls, incontinence, and functional dependence: Unifying the approach to geriatric syndromes. JAMA 1995; 273: 1348 – 1354.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalanos AN, Fillenbaum GG, Cohen HJ, Burchett BM. The comprehensive assessment of community dwelling elderly: Why functional status is not enough. Aging Clin Exp Res 1994; 6: 343 – 352.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteel RK, Sherwood S, Ribbe M. The future: A person‐specific standardized assessment instrument. Age Ageing, in press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd Ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorris JN, Fries BE, Mehr DR et al. MDS cognitive performance scale. J Gerontol: Med Sci 1994; 49: M174 – 182.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceImproving the Quality of care in Nursing Homes. Publication IOM‐85‐10. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1986.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIkegami N. Functional assessment and its place in health care. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 598 – 599.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1532-5415.1997.tb02975.x.pdf
Size:
724.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.