Show simple item record

Searching as learning: Novel measures for information interaction research

dc.contributor.authorRieh, Soo Youngen_US
dc.contributor.authorGwizdka, Jaceken_US
dc.contributor.authorFreund, Luanneen_US
dc.contributor.authorCollins‐thompson, Kevynen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-04T20:36:17Z
dc.date.available2015-05-04T20:36:17Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationRieh, Soo Young; Gwizdka, Jacek; Freund, Luanne; Collins‐thompson, Kevyn (2014). "Searching as learning: Novel measures for information interaction research." Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 51(1): 1-4.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0044-7870en_US
dc.identifier.issn1550-8390en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/111136
dc.description.abstractThere is growing recognition of the importance of learning as a search outcome and of the need to provide support for it. Yet, before we can consider learning as a part of search, we need to know how to assess it. This panel will focus on methods and measures for assessing learning in the context of search tasks and their outcomes. The panel will be interactive as the audience will be encouraged to engage in contributing their own experiences and ideas related to measures and methods to study learning as a part of search processes. Ideas and experiences with explicit and implicit indicators of learning and with evaluating learning outcomes will be shared during a dialogue between the audience and panelists. Outcomes from the panel discussions will contribute to formulating a research agenda for “search as learning.” The outcomes will be shared with the audience (and the wider ASIST community).en_US
dc.publisherAllyn & Baconen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.othermeasures of learning in searchingen_US
dc.subject.otherSearch as learningen_US
dc.titleSearching as learning: Novel measures for information interaction researchen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInformation and Library Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/111136/1/meet14505101021.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/meet.2014.14505101021en_US
dc.identifier.sourceProceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKintsch, W. ( 1998 ) Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgosti, M., Fhur, N., Toms, E. & Vakkari, P. (Eds.) ( 2013 ). Evaluation of methodologies in information retrieval. Report from Dagstuhl Seminar 13441.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllan, J. Croft, B., Moffat, A. & Sanderson, M. ( 2012 ). Frontiers, challenges, and opportunities for information retrieval: Report from SWIRL 2012. ACM SIGIR Forum, 46 ( 1 ), 2 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCole, M., Gwizdka, J., Liu C., Bierig, R., Belkin, N., & Zhang, X. ( 2011 ). Task and user effects on reading patterns in information search. Interacting with Computers. 23 ( 4 ), 346 – 362.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCole, M. J., Gwizdka, J., Liu, C., Belkin, N. J., & Zhang, X. ( 2013 ). Inferring user knowledge level from eye movement patterns. Information Processing & Management, 49 ( 5 ), 1075 – 1091.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins‐Thompson, K. & Callan, J. ( 2004 ). Information retrieval for language tutoring: an overview of the REAP project. In Proceedings of SIGIR 2004 (pp. 544 – 545 ). ACM.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins‐Thompson, K. & Callan, J. ( 2005 ). Predicting reading difficulty with statistical language models. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56 ( 13 ), 1448 – 1462.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins‐Thompson, K., Bennett, P.N., White, R.W., de la Chica, S., & Sontag, D. ( 2011 ). Personalizing Web search results by reading level. In Proceedings of the Twentieth ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM 2011).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaman, K., Bennett, P.N., & Collins‐Thompson, K. Toward whole‐session relevance: exploring intrinsic diversity in Web search. In Proceedings of SIGIR 2013. (pp. 463 – 472 ). ACM.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGwizdka, J. ( 2014 ). News stories relevance effects on eye‐movement. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA'2014). (pp. 283 – 286 ). ACM.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGwizdka, J. ( 2013 ). Looking for information relevance in the brain. Paper presented at the Gmunden Retreat on NeuroIS 2013. June 1‐4, 2013. (p 14.). Gmunden, Austria.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJansen, B. J., Booth, D. & Smith, B. ( 2009 ). Using the taxonomy of cognitive learning to model online searching. Information Processing & Management, 45, 643 – 663.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKammerer, Y., Nairn, R., Pirolli, P., & Chi, E. H. ( 2009 ). Signpost from the masses: Learning effects in an exploratory social tag search browser. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 625 – 634 ). ACM.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKelly, D. ( 2009 ). Methods for evaluating interactive information retrieval systems with users. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 3 ( 1 ), 1 – 224.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKopak, R., Freund, L. & O'Brien, H.L. Digital information interaction as semantic navigation, In A. Foster & P. Rafferty (Eds.) Innovations in IR: Perspectives for theory and practice (pp. 117 – 134 ). London: Facet Publishing.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarchionini, G. ( 2006 ). Exploratory search: From finding to understanding. Communications of the ACM, 49 ( 4 ), 41 – 46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarkey, K. Leeder, C., & Rieh, S. Y. ( 2014 ). Designing online information literacy games students want to play. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWildemuth, B.M. & Freund, L. ( 2012 ). Assigning search tasks designed to elicit exploratory search behaviors. Human Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval Symposium (HCIR 2012), Cambridge, MA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, M. L., André, P., & schraefel, m.c. ( 2008 ). Backward highlighting: Enhancing faceted search. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 235 – 238 ). ACM.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, M. J. & Wilson, M. L. ( 2013 ). A comparison of techniques for measuring sensemaking and learning within participant‐generated summaries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64 ( 2 ), 291 – 306.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, L. et al. ( 2000 ). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.