View Item 

Show simple item record

Children's Developing Intuitions About the Truth Conditions and Implications of Novel Generics Versus Quantified Statements
dc.contributor.authorBrandone, Amanda C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGelman, Susan A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHedglen, Jennaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-04T20:36:31Z
dc.date.available2016-07-05T17:27:59Zen
dc.date.issued2015-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationBrandone, Amanda C.; Gelman, Susan A.; Hedglen, Jenna (2015). "Children's Developing Intuitions About the Truth Conditions and Implications of Novel Generics Versus Quantified Statements." Cognitive Science (4): 711-738.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0364-0213en_US
dc.identifier.issn1551-6709en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/111169
dc.description.abstractGeneric statements express generalizations about categories and present a unique semantic profile that is distinct from quantified statements. This paper reports two studies examining the development of children's intuitions about the semantics of generics and how they differ from statements quantified by all, most, and some. Results reveal that, like adults, preschoolers (a) recognize that generics have flexible truth conditions and are capable of representing a wide range of prevalence levels; and (b) interpret novel generics as having near‐universal prevalence implications. Results further show that by age 4, children are beginning to differentiate the meaning of generics and quantified statements; however, even 7‐ to 11‐year‐olds are not adultlike in their intuitions about the meaning of most‐quantified statements. Overall, these studies suggest that by preschool, children interpret generics in much the same way that adults do; however, mastery of the semantics of quantified statements follows a more protracted course.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherAcademic Pressen_US
dc.subject.otherGeneric languageen_US
dc.subject.otherLanguage understandingen_US
dc.subject.otherLanguage acquisitionen_US
dc.subject.otherSemanticsen_US
dc.subject.otherCognitive developmenten_US
dc.subject.otherConceptsen_US
dc.titleChildren's Developing Intuitions About the Truth Conditions and Implications of Novel Generics Versus Quantified Statementsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/111169/1/cogs12176.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cogs.12176en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCognitive Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLidz, J., & Musolino, J. ( 2002 ). Children's command of quantification. Cognition, 84, 113 – 154.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeslie, S. J., Khemlani, S., & Glucksberg, S. ( 2011 ). Do all ducks lay eggs? The generic overgeneralization effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 15 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLewis, D. ( 1975 ). Adverbs of quantification. In E. Keenan (Ed.), Formal semantics of natural language (pp. 3 – 15 ). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. ( 1986 ). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73, 13 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiebesman, D. ( 2011 ). Simple generics. Nous, 45 ( 3 ), 409 – 442.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeyer, M., Gelman, S. A., & Stilwell, S. M. ( 2011 ). Generics are a cognitive default: Evidence from sentence processing. In L. Carlson, C. Holscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 913 – 918 ). Boston, MA: Cognitive Science Society.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMusolino, J., & Lidz, M. ( 2006 ). Why children aren't universally successful with quantification. Linguistics, 44, 817 – 852.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNoveck, I. ( 2001 ). When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition, 78, 165 – 188.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePapafragou, A., & Musolino, J. ( 2003 ). Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface. Cognition, 86, 253 – 282.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePapafragou, A., & Schwarz, N. ( 2006 ). Most wanted. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics [Special issue: On the Acquisition of Quantification], 13, 207 – 251.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePappas, A., & Gelman, S. A. ( 1998 ). Generic noun phrases in mother‐child conversations. Journal of Child Language, 25, 19 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePelletier, F. J., & Asher, N. ( 1997 ). Generics and defaults. In J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (Eds.), Handbook of logic and language (pp. 1125 – 1179 ). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhillip, W. ( 1995 ). Event quantification in the acquisition of universal quantification. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePouscoulous, N., Noveck, I. A., Politzer, G., & Bastide, A. ( 2007 ). A developmental investigation of processing costs in implicature production. Language Acquisition, 14, 347 – 375.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrasada, S. ( 2000 ). Acquiring generic knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 66 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrasada, S., & Dillingham, E. M. ( 2006 ). Principled and statistical connections in common sense conception. Cognition, 99, 73 – 112.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrasada, S., & Dillingham, E. M. ( 2009 ). Representation of principled connections: A window onto the formal aspect of common sense conception. Cognitive Science, 33, 401 – 448.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRhodes, M., Leslie, S. J., & Tworek, C. M. ( 2012 ). Cultural transmission of social essentialism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 13526 – 13531.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosch, E. H. ( 1973 ). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328 – 350.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, C. L. ( 1979 ). Children's understanding of natural language hierarchies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27, 437 – 458.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, C. L. ( 1980 ). Quantifiers and question answering in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 191 – 205.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSneed, E. ( 2008 ). Input in the acquisition of genericity. Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStickney, H. ( 2006 ). Children's interpretation of partitive “most”. In T. Heizmann (Ed.), UMass occasional papers in linguistics 34: Current issues in first language acquisition (pp. 129 – 160 ). Amherst, MA: GLSA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSullivan, J., & Barner, D. ( 2011 ). Number words, quantifiers, and principles of word learning. WIREs Cognitive Science, 2, 639 – 645.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbelson, R. P., & Kanouse, D. E. ( 1966 ). Subjective acceptance of verbal generalizations. In S. Feldman (Ed.), Cognitive consistency: Motivational antecedents and behavioral consequents (pp. 171 – 197 ). New York: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAsher, N., & Morreau, M. ( 1995 ). What some generic sentences mean. In G. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 300 – 339 ). Chicago: Chicago University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarner, D., Chow, K., & Yang, S. ( 2009 ). Finding one's meaning: A test of the relation between quantifiers and integers in language development. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 195 – 219.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarwise, J., & Cooper, R. ( 1981 ). Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, 159 – 219.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrandone, A. C., Cimpian, A., Leslie, S. J., & Gelman, S. A. ( 2012 ). Do lions have manes? For children, generics are about kinds rather than quantities. Child Development, 83, 423 – 433.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrooks, P., & Braine, M. ( 1996 ). What do children know about the universal quantifiers all and each? Cognition, 60, 235 – 268.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrooks, P. J., & Sekerina, I. A. ( 2006 ). Shortcuts to quantifier interpretation in children and adults. Language Acquisition, 13, 177 – 206.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlson, G. N. ( 1977 ). Reference to kinds in English. Doctoral dissertation, Amherst: University of Massachusetts.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlson, G. N., & Pelletier, F. J. ( 1995 ). The generic book. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChambers, C. G., Graham, S. A., & Turner, J. N. ( 2008 ). When hearsay trumps evidence: How generic language guides preschoolers’ inferences about unfamiliar things. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1 – 18.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCimpian, A., Brandone, A. C., & Gelman, S. A. ( 2010 ). Generic statements require little evidence for acceptance but have powerful implications. Cognitive Science, 34, 1452 – 1482.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCimpian, A., Gelman, S. A., & Brandone, A. C. ( 2010 ). Theory‐based considerations influence the interpretation of generic sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 261 – 276.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCimpian, A., & Markman, E. M. ( 2008 ). Preschool children's use of cues to generic meaning. Cognition, 107, 19 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCimpian, A., & Markman, E. M. ( 2009 ). Information learned from generic language becomes central to children's biological concepts: Evidence from their open‐ended explanations. Cognition, 113, 14 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCimpian, A., & Markman, E. M. ( 2011 ). The generic/nongeneric distinction influences how children interpret new information about social others. Child Development, 82, 471 – 492.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen, A. ( 1996 ). Think generic: The meaning and use of generic sentences. Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrain, S. C., Thornton, R., Boster, C., Conway, L., Lillo‐Martin, D., & Woodams, E. ( 1996 ). Quantification without qualification. Language Acquisition, 5, 83 – 153.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiesing, M. ( 1992 ). Bare plural subjects and the derivation of logical representations. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 353 – 380.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman, S. A. ( 2003 ). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. London: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman, S. A. ( 2004 ). Learning words for kinds: Generic noun phrases in acquisition. In D. G. Hall & S. R. Waxman (Eds.), Weaving a lexicon (pp. 445 – 484 ). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman, S. A. ( 2009 ). Learning from others: Children's construction of concepts. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 115 – 140.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman, S. A. ( 2010 ). Generics as a window onto young children's concepts. In F. J. Pelletier (Ed.), Kinds, things, and stuff: The cognitive side of generics and mass terms. New directions in cognitive science (pp. 100 – 120 ) (Vol. 12). New York: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman, S. A., & Bloom, P. ( 2007 ). Developmental changes in the understanding of generics. Cognition, 105 ( 1 ), 166 – 183.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman, S. A., Coley, J. D., Rosengren, K. S., Hartman, E., & Pappas, A. ( 1998 ). Beyond labeling: The role of parental input in the acquisition of richly‐structured categories. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63, Serial No. 253.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman, S. A., Goetz, P. J., Sarnecka, B. W., & Flukes, J. ( 2008 ). Generic language in parent‐child conversations. Language Learning and Development, 4, 1 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman, S. A., & Raman, L. ( 2003 ). Preschool children use linguistic form class and pragmatic cues to interpret generics. Child Development, 74, 308 – 325.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman, S. A., Star, J. R., & Flukes, J. E. ( 2002 ). Children's use of generics in inductive inferences. Journal of Cognition and Development, 3, 179 – 199.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman, S. A., Taylor, M. G., & Nguyen, S. P. ( 2004 ). Mother‐child conversations about gender: Understanding the acquisition of essentialist beliefs. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69, Serial No. 275.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman, S. A., Ware, E. A., & Kleinberg, F. ( 2010 ). Effects of generic language on category content and structure. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 273 – 301.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGraham, S. A., Nayer, S. L., & Gelman, S. A. ( 2011 ). Two‐year‐olds use the generic/nongeneric distinction to guide their inferences about novel kinds. Child Development, 82, 493 – 507.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenberg, Y. ( 2003 ). Manifestations of genericity. New York: Routledge.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrice, P. ( 1989 ). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGualmini, A. ( 2004 ). Some knowledge children don't lack. Linguistics, 42, 957 – 982.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuasti, M. T., Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Foppolo, F., Gualmini, A., & Meroni, L. ( 2005 ). Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 667 – 696.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalberda, J., Taing, L., & Lidz, J. ( 2008 ). The development of ‘most’ comprehension and its potential dependence on counting ability in preschoolers. Language Learning and Development, 4, 99 – 121.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarris, P. L., & Koenig, M. A. ( 2006 ). Trust in testimony: How children learn about science and religion. Child Development, 77, 505 – 524.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeim, I. ( 1982 ). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHollander, M. A., Gelman, S. A., & Raman, L. ( 2009 ). Generic language and judgments about category membership: Can generics highlight properties as central? Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 481 – 505.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHollander, M. A., Gelman, S. A., & Star, J. ( 2002 ). Children's interpretations of generic noun phrases. Developmental Psychology, 38, 883 – 894.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHorn, L. ( 1992 ). The said and the unsaid. In C. Barker & D. Dowty (Eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory II (pp. 163 – 192 ). Columbus, OH: Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuang, Y. T., & Snedeker, J. ( 2009 ). Semantic meaning and pragmatic interpretation in 5‐year‐olds: Evidence from real‐time spoken language comprehension. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1723 – 1739.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHurewitz, F., Papafragou, A., Gleitman, L., & Gelman, R. ( 2006 ). Asymmetries in the acquisition of numbers and quantifiers. Language Learning and Development, 2, 77 – 96.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKamp, H. ( 1981 ). A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. Groendendijk, T. Janssen, & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Formal methods in the study of language: Proceedings of the third Amsterdam colloquium (pp. 277 – 322 ). Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrifka, M., Pelletier, F. J., Carlson, G. N., ter Meulen, A., Chierchia, G., & Link, G. ( 1995 ). Genericity: An introduction. In G. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 1 – 124 ). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeslie, S. J. ( 2007 ). Generics and the structure of the mind. Philosophical Perspectives, 21, 375 – 405.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeslie, S. J. ( 2008 ). Generics: Cognition and acquisition. Philosophical Review, 117, 1 – 47.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeslie, S. J. ( 2012 ). Generics articulate default generalization. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes: New Perspectives on Genericity at the Interfaces, 41, 25 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeslie, S. J., & Gelman, S. A. ( 2012 ). Quantified statements are recalled as generics: Evidence from preschool children and adults. Cognitive Psychology, 64, 186 – 214.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
cogs12176.pdf
Size:
289.2KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.