Show simple item record

Credibility perceptions of content contributors and consumers in social media

dc.contributor.authorRieh, Soo Youngen_US
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Meredith Ringelen_US
dc.contributor.authorMetzger, Miriam J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFrancke, Helenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJeon, Grace YoungJooen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-04T20:36:34Z
dc.date.available2015-05-04T20:36:34Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationRieh, Soo Young; Morris, Meredith Ringel; Metzger, Miriam J.; Francke, Helena; Jeon, Grace YoungJoo (2014). "Credibility perceptions of content contributors and consumers in social media." Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 51(1): 1-4.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0044-7870en_US
dc.identifier.issn1550-8390en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/111174
dc.description.abstractThis panel addresses information credibility issues in the context of social media. During this panel, participants will discuss people's credibility perceptions of online content in social media from the perspectives of both content contributors and consumers. Each panelist will bring her own perspective on credibility issues in various social media, including Twitter (Morris), Wikipedia (Metzger; Francke), blogs (Rieh), and social Q&A (Jeon). This panel aims to flesh out multi‐disciplinary approaches to the investigation of credibility and discuss integrated conceptual frameworks and future research directions focusing on assessing and establishing credibility in social media.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherACM Pressen_US
dc.subject.othersocial media usersen_US
dc.subject.othercontent contributorsen_US
dc.subject.otheruser‐generated contenten_US
dc.subject.othersocial mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherCredibilityen_US
dc.titleCredibility perceptions of content contributors and consumers in social mediaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInformation and Library Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/111174/1/meet14505101022.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/meet.2014.14505101022en_US
dc.identifier.sourceProceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFogg, B. J., & Tseng, H. ( 1999 ). The elements of computer credibility. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '99) (pp. 80 – 87 ). ACM Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRieh, S. Y., Jeon, G. YJ, Yang, J. Y., & Lampe, C. ( 2014 ). Audience‐aware credibility: From understanding audience to establishing credible blogs. In Proceedings of the Eight International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM '14). AAAI.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRieh, S. Y., Kim, Y. M., Yang, J. Y., & St. Jean, B. ( 2010 ). A diary study of credibility assessment in everyday life information activities on the web: Preliminary findings. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST '10), 47.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorris, M. R., Counts, S., Roseway, A., Hoff, A., & Schwarz, J. ( 2012 ). Tweeting is believing?: Understanding microblog credibility perceptions. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12) (pp. 441 – 450 ). ACM Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJeon, G. Y. J. & Rieh, S. Y. ( 2014 ). Answers from the crowd: How credible are strangers in social Q&A? In Proceedings of iConference 2014 (pp. 663 – 668 ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrancke, H. & Sundin, O. ( 2012 ). Negotiating the role of sources: Educators' conceptions of credibility in participatory media. Library & Information Science Research, 34 ( 3 ), 169 – 175.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrancke, H. & Sundin, O. ( 2010 ). An inside view: Credibility in Wikipedia from the perspective of editors. Information Research, 15 ( 3 ), paper colis702. http://informationr.net/ir/15-3/colis7/colis702.htmlen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYang, J., Counts, S., Morris, M. R., & Hoff, A. ( 2013 ). Microblog credibility perceptions: Comparing the USA and China. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13) (pp. 575 – 586 ). ACM Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUSC‐Annenberg School Center for the Digital Future. ( 2007 ). Online world as important to internet users as real world? USC‐Annenberg Digital Future Project. http://www.digitalcenter.org/pdf/2007-Digital-Future-Report-Press-Release-112906.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSt. Jean, B., Rieh, S. Y., Yang, J. Y., & Kim, Y. M. ( 2011 ). How content contributors assess and establish credibility on the Web. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST '11), 48.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwarz, J. & Morris, M. R. ( 2011 ). Augmenting web pages and search results to support credibility assessment. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11) (pp. 1245 – 1254.) ACM Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoper, B. ( 1985 ). Public attitudes toward television and other media in a time of change. New York: Television Information Office.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.