Credibility perceptions of content contributors and consumers in social media
dc.contributor.author | Rieh, Soo Young | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Morris, Meredith Ringel | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Metzger, Miriam J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Francke, Helena | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Jeon, Grace YoungJoo | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-04T20:36:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-04T20:36:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Rieh, Soo Young; Morris, Meredith Ringel; Metzger, Miriam J.; Francke, Helena; Jeon, Grace YoungJoo (2014). "Credibility perceptions of content contributors and consumers in social media." Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 51(1): 1-4. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0044-7870 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1550-8390 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/111174 | |
dc.description.abstract | This panel addresses information credibility issues in the context of social media. During this panel, participants will discuss people's credibility perceptions of online content in social media from the perspectives of both content contributors and consumers. Each panelist will bring her own perspective on credibility issues in various social media, including Twitter (Morris), Wikipedia (Metzger; Francke), blogs (Rieh), and social Q&A (Jeon). This panel aims to flesh out multi‐disciplinary approaches to the investigation of credibility and discuss integrated conceptual frameworks and future research directions focusing on assessing and establishing credibility in social media. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.publisher | ACM Press | en_US |
dc.subject.other | social media users | en_US |
dc.subject.other | content contributors | en_US |
dc.subject.other | user‐generated content | en_US |
dc.subject.other | social media | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Credibility | en_US |
dc.title | Credibility perceptions of content contributors and consumers in social media | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Information and Library Science | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/111174/1/meet14505101022.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/meet.2014.14505101022 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fogg, B. J., & Tseng, H. ( 1999 ). The elements of computer credibility. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '99) (pp. 80 – 87 ). ACM Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rieh, S. Y., Jeon, G. YJ, Yang, J. Y., & Lampe, C. ( 2014 ). Audience‐aware credibility: From understanding audience to establishing credible blogs. In Proceedings of the Eight International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM '14). AAAI. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rieh, S. Y., Kim, Y. M., Yang, J. Y., & St. Jean, B. ( 2010 ). A diary study of credibility assessment in everyday life information activities on the web: Preliminary findings. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST '10), 47. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Morris, M. R., Counts, S., Roseway, A., Hoff, A., & Schwarz, J. ( 2012 ). Tweeting is believing?: Understanding microblog credibility perceptions. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12) (pp. 441 – 450 ). ACM Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Jeon, G. Y. J. & Rieh, S. Y. ( 2014 ). Answers from the crowd: How credible are strangers in social Q&A? In Proceedings of iConference 2014 (pp. 663 – 668 ). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Francke, H. & Sundin, O. ( 2012 ). Negotiating the role of sources: Educators' conceptions of credibility in participatory media. Library & Information Science Research, 34 ( 3 ), 169 – 175. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Francke, H. & Sundin, O. ( 2010 ). An inside view: Credibility in Wikipedia from the perspective of editors. Information Research, 15 ( 3 ), paper colis702. http://informationr.net/ir/15-3/colis7/colis702.html | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Yang, J., Counts, S., Morris, M. R., & Hoff, A. ( 2013 ). Microblog credibility perceptions: Comparing the USA and China. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13) (pp. 575 – 586 ). ACM Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | USC‐Annenberg School Center for the Digital Future. ( 2007 ). Online world as important to internet users as real world? USC‐Annenberg Digital Future Project. http://www.digitalcenter.org/pdf/2007-Digital-Future-Report-Press-Release-112906.pdf. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | St. Jean, B., Rieh, S. Y., Yang, J. Y., & Kim, Y. M. ( 2011 ). How content contributors assess and establish credibility on the Web. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST '11), 48. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Schwarz, J. & Morris, M. R. ( 2011 ). Augmenting web pages and search results to support credibility assessment. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11) (pp. 1245 – 1254.) ACM Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Roper, B. ( 1985 ). Public attitudes toward television and other media in a time of change. New York: Television Information Office. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.