View Item 

Show simple item record

Patterns and predictors of sexual function after liver donation: The adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study

dc.contributor.authorDiMartini, Andrea F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDew, Mary Amandaen_US
dc.contributor.authorButt, Zeeshanen_US
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, Mary Annen_US
dc.contributor.authorLadner, Daniela P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Abigail R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHill‐callahan, Pegen_US
dc.contributor.authorGillespie, Brenda W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-04T20:37:03Z
dc.date.available2016-07-05T17:27:59Zen
dc.date.issued2015-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationDiMartini, Andrea F.; Dew, Mary Amanda; Butt, Zeeshan; Simpson, Mary Ann; Ladner, Daniela P.; Smith, Abigail R.; Hill‐callahan, Peg ; Gillespie, Brenda W. (2015). "Patterns and predictors of sexual function after liver donation: The adultâ toâ adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study." Liver Transplantation 21(5): 670-682.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1527-6465en_US
dc.identifier.issn1527-6473en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/111242
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherTransaction Booksen_US
dc.titlePatterns and predictors of sexual function after liver donation: The adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation cohort studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSurgery and Anesthesiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/111242/1/lt24108.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/lt.24108en_US
dc.identifier.sourceLiver Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwitzer GE, Dew MA, Simmons RG. Donor ambivalence and postdonation outcomes: implications for living donation. Transplant Proc 1997; 29: 1476.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalter M, Bronner E, Pascher A, Steinmüller T, Neuhaus P, Klapp BF, Danzer G. Psychosocial outcome of living donors after living donor liver transplantation: a pilot study. Clin Transplant 2002; 16: 339 ‐ 344.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePascher A, Sauer IM, Walter M, Lopez‐Haeninnen E, Theruvath T, Spinelli A, et al. Donor evaluation, donor risks, donor outcome, and donor quality of life in adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2002; 8: 829 ‐ 837.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuBay DA, Holtzman S, Adcock L, Abbey SE, Greenwood S, Macleod C, et al. Cosmesis and body image after adult right lobe living liver donation. Transplantation 2010; 89: 1270 ‐ 1275.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self‐report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26: 191 ‐ 208.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997; 49: 822 ‐ 830.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimmons RG, Marine SK, Simmons RL. Gift of Life: The Effect of Organ Transplantation on Individual, Family, and Societal Dynamics. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books; 1987.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, et al. The Mini‐International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM‐IV and ICD‐10. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59 ( suppl 20 ): 22 ‐ 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGerstenberger EP, Rosen RC, Brewer JV, Meston CM, Brotto LA, Wiegel M, Sand M. Sexual desire and the female sexual function index (FSFI): a sexual desire cutpoint for clinical interpretation of the FSFI in women with and without hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 3096 ‐ 3103.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGacci M, Bartoletti R, Figlioli S, Sarti E, Eisner B, Boddi V, Rizzo M. Urinary symptoms, quality of life and sexual function in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy before and after prostatectomy: a prospective study. BJU Int 2003; 91: 196 ‐ 200.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHendren SK, O'Connor BI, Liu M, Asano T, Cohen Z, Swallow CJ, et al. Prevalence of male and female sexual dysfunction is high following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 212 ‐ 223.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShah SM, Bukkapatnam R, Rodríguez LV. Impact of vaginal surgery for stress urinary incontinence on female sexual function: Is the use of polypropylene mesh detrimental? Urology 2005; 65: 270 ‐ 274.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwitzer GE, Dew MA, Butterworth VA, Simmons RG, Schimmel M. Understanding donors’ motivations: a study of unrelated bone marrow donors. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 137 ‐ 147.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwitzer GE, Myaskovsky L, Goycoolea JM, Dew MA, Confer DL, King R. Factors associated with ambivalence about bone marrow donation among newly recruited unrelated potential donors. Transplantation 2003; 75: 1517 ‐ 1523.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwitzer GE, Dew MA, Goycoolea JM, Myaskovsky L, Abress L, Confer DL. Attrition of potential bone marrow donors at two key decision points leading to donation. Transplantation 2004; 77: 1529 ‐ 1534.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMyaskovsky L, Dew MA, Crowley‐Matoka M, Unruh M, DeVito Dabbs A, Shapiro R, Tan H. Is donating a kidney associated with changes in health habits? Am J Transplant 2010; 10 ( suppl 4 ): 536.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorley MC, Elswick RK, Sargeant CC, Scott S. Attitude, self‐image, and quality of life of living kidney donors. Nephrol Nurs J 2000; 27: 43 ‐ 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDew MA, DiMartini AF, DeVito Dabbs AJ, Zuckoff A, Tan HP, McNulty ML, et al. Preventive intervention for living donor psychosocial outcomes: feasibility and efficacy in a randomized controlled trial. Am J Transplant 2013; 13: 2672 ‐ 2684.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiMartini A, Cruz RJ Jr, Dew MA, Fitzgerald MG, Chiappetta L, Myaskovsky L, DeVera ME. Motives and decision making of potential living liver donors: Comparisons between gender, relationships and ambivalence. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 136 ‐ 151.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarrell FE. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis. Springer Series in Statistics. New York, NY: Springer; 2001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbecassis MM, Fisher RA, Olthoff KM, Freise CE, Rodrigo DR, Samstein B, et al. Complications of living donor hepatic lobectomy--a comprehensive report. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 1208 ‐ 1217.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParikh ND, Ladner D, Abecassis M, Butt Z. Quality of life for donors after living donor liver transplantation: a review of the literature. Liver Transpl 2010; 16: 1352 ‐ 1358.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVerbesey JE, Simpson MA, Pomposelli JJ, Richman E, Bracken AM, Garrigan K, et al. Living donor adult liver transplantation: a longitudinal study of the donor's quality of life. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 2770 ‐ 2777.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchulz KH, Kroencke S, Beckmann M, Nadalin S, Paul A, Fischer L, et al. Mental and physical quality of life in actual living liver donors versus potential living liver donors: a prospective, controlled, multicenter study. Liver Transpl 2009; 15: 1676 ‐ 1687.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHumar A, Carolan E, Ibrahim H, Horn K, Larson E, Glessing B, et al. A comparison of surgical outcomes and quality of life surveys in right lobe vs. left lateral segment liver donors. Am J Transplant 2005; 5 ( pt 1 ): 805 ‐ 809.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChan SC, Liu CL, Lo CM, Lam BK, Lee EW, Fan ST. Donor quality of life before and after adult‐to‐adult right liver live donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2006; 12: 1529 ‐ 1536.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
lt24108.pdf
Size:
302.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.