Show simple item record

The Interdigital Brace and Other Grips for Termite Nest Perforation by Chimpanzees of the Goualougo Triangle, Republic of Congo

dc.contributor.authorLesnik, Julie J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSanz, Crickette M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, David B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-01T18:51:41Z
dc.date.available2016-07-05T17:27:57Zen
dc.date.issued2015-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationLesnik, Julie J.; Sanz, Crickette M.; Morgan, David B. (2015). "The Interdigital Brace and Other Grips for Termite Nest Perforation by Chimpanzees of the Goualougo Triangle, Republic of Congo." American Journal of Physical Anthropology 157(2): 252-259.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-9483en_US
dc.identifier.issn1096-8644en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/111769
dc.description.abstractStudies of chimpanzee termite foraging enlighten our understanding of early hominin tool use not only by modeling the cognitive ability of our ancestors but also by emphasizing the possible role of social insects in the hominin diet. The chimpanzees of the Goualougo Triangle are known to have one of the largest and most complex tool repertoires reported for wild chimpanzees. One tool set habitually used by this population includes a perforating tool to penetrate the hard outer crust of elevated termite nests before fishing for termite prey with an herbaceous stem. Here, we report the variation present in the grips used on the perforating tool. Our analysis of video recordings of chimpanzee visitation to termite nests over a 3‐year period shows that these chimpanzees use a variety of grips to navigate the challenges encountered in opening a termite nest. For situations in which the soil is most hardened, perforating requires force and a power grip is often used. When the soil in the passageway is loose, precision grips are suitable for the task. One of the preferred grips reported here is an interdigital brace, which has previously been described in studies of how some people hold a pencil. In this study, for the first time, the interdigital brace has been thoroughly described for chimpanzees. The various strategies and grips used during perforation emphasize the importance of termites as a nutritional resource that should be considered more strongly as a food used by early hominins. Am J Phys Anthropol 157:252–259, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherJunken_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherentomophagyen_US
dc.subject.otherPan troglodytesen_US
dc.subject.otherMacrotermesen_US
dc.subject.otherinsectivoryen_US
dc.subject.otherobject manipulationen_US
dc.subject.othertool useen_US
dc.titleThe Interdigital Brace and Other Grips for Termite Nest Perforation by Chimpanzees of the Goualougo Triangle, Republic of Congoen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelAnthropologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/111769/1/ajpa22706.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ajpa.22706en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePreuschoft H. 1973. Functional anatomy of the upper extremity. In: Bourne G, editor. The chimpanzee. New York: Karger‐Verlag. p 34 – 120.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLovejoy CO, Simpson SW, White TD, Asfaw B, Suwa G. 2009. Carfeful climbing in the Miocene: The forelimbs of Ardipithecus ramidus and humans are primitive. Science 326: 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarzke M, Pouydebat E, Laurin M, Gorce P, Bels V. 2009. A clarification of Pouydebat et al., 2008, evolution of grasping among anthropoids. J Evol Biol 22: 2554 – 2557.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarzke M, Wullstein K. 1996. Chimpanzee and human grips: a new classification with a focus on evolutionary morphology. Int J Primatol 17: 117 – 139.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcGrew WC, Tutin CEG, Baldwin PJ. 1979. Chimpanzees, tools, and termites: cross‐cultural comparisons of Senegal, Tanzania, and Rio Muni. Man 14: 185 – 214.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeulman EJM, Sanz CM, Visalberghi E, van Schaik, CP. 2012. The role of terrestriality in promoting primate technology. Evol Anthropol 21: 58 – 68.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorris D. 1963. Biology of art: a study of picture‐making behaviour of the great apes and its relationship to human art. London: Methuen.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNapier J. 1956. The prehensile movement of the human hand. J Bone Joint Surg B 38: 902 – 913.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNapier J. 1960. Studies of the hands of living primates. Proc Zool Soc Lond 134: 647 – 657.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNapier J. 1962. Fossil hand bones from Olduvai Gorge. Nature 96: 409 – 411.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePouydebat E, Laurin M, Gorce P, Bels V. 2008. Evolution of grasping among anthropoids. J Evol Biol 21: 1732 – 1743.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSabater Pi J. 1974. An elementary industry of the chimpanzees in the Okorobiko Mountains, Rio Muni (Republic of Equatorial Guinea), West Africa. Primates 15: 351 – 364.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanz C, Deblauwe I, Tagg N, Morgan DB. 2014. Insect prey characteristics affecting regional variation in chimpanzee tool use. J Hum Evol 71: 28 – 37.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanz C, Morgan D. 2007. Chimpanzee tool technology in the Goualougo Triangle, Republic of Congo. J Hum Evol 52: 420 – 433.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanz C, Morgan D, Gulick S. 2004. New insights into chimpanzees, tools, and termites from the Congo Basin. Am Nat 164: 567 – 581.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchick K, Toth N, Garufi G. 1999. Continuing investigation into the stone tool‐making and tool‐using capabilities of a bonobo ( Pan paniscus ). J Archaeol Sci 26: 821 – 832.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSelin A. 2003. Pencil grip. A descriptive model and four empirical studies. Abo: Abo Akademi University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceToth N, Schick K, Savage‐Rumbaugh ES, Sevcik RA, Rumbaugh SM. 1993. Pan the tool‐maker: investigations into the stone tool‐making and tool‐using capabilities of a bonobo ( Pan paniscus ). J Archaeol Sci 20: 81 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTutin CE, Fernandez M. 1983. Gorillas feeding on termites in Gabon, West Africa. J Mammal 64: 530 – 531.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTuttle RH. 1969a. Knuckle‐walking and the problem of human origins. Science 166: 953 – 961.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTuttle RH. 1969b. Quantitative and functional studies on the hands of the Anthropoidea. I. The Hominoidea. J Morphol 128: 309 – 364.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWynn T, Hernandez‐Aguilar RA, Marchant LF, McGrew WC. 2011. “An ape's view of the Oldowan” revisited. Evol Anthropol 20: 181 – 197.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWynn T, McGrew WC. 1989. An ape's view of the Oldowan. Man 24: 283 – 298.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlmécija S, Moyà‐Solà S, Alba DM. 2010. Early origin for human‐like precision grasping: a comparative study of pollical distal phalanges in fossil hominins. PLoS One 5: e11727.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBackwell LR, d'Errico F. 2001. Evidence of termite foraging by Swartkrans early hominids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 1358 – 1363.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBodenheimer FS. 1951. Insects as human food. The Hague: Junk.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoesch C, Boesch H. 1993. Different hand postures for pounding nuts with natural hammers by wild chimpanzees. In: Prueschoft and Chivers, editors. Hands of Primates. New York: Springer‐Verlag. p 31 – 44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrain CK. 1967. Bone weathering and the problem of bone pseudo‐tools. S Afr J Sci 63: 97 – 99.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceByrne R, Corp N. 2001. Manual dexterity in the gorilla: bimanual and digit role differentiation in a natural task. Anim Cogn 4: 347 – 361.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristel M. 1993. Grasping techniques and hand preferences in Hominoidea. In: Prueschoft and Chivers, editors. Hands of primates. New York: Springer‐Verlag. p 91 – 108.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorp N, Byrne R. 2002. The ontogeny of manual skill in wild chimpanzees: evidence from feeding on the fruit of Saba florida. Behaviour 139: 137 – 168.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrast J, Fragaszy D, Hayashi M, Matsuzawa T. 2009. Dynamic in‐hand movements in adult and young juvenile chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ). Am J Phys Anthropol 138: 274 – 285.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDart R. 1957. The osteodontokeratic culture of Australopithecus prometheus. Pretoria: Transvaal Museum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeblauwe I, Janssens G. 2008. New insights in prey choice by chimpanzee and gorillas in Southeast Cameroon: the role of nutritional value. Am J Phys Anthropol 135: 42 – 55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenced'Errico F, Backwell LR. 2009. Assessing the function of early hominin bone tools. Am J Archaeol Sci 36: 1764 – 1773.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaldikas BMF. 1988. Orangutan diet, range and activity at Tanjung Putting, Central Borneo. Int J Primatol 9: 1 – 35.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoodall J. 1970. Tool‐using in primates and other vertebrates. Adv Study Behav 3: 195 – 249.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLazenby RA, Skinner MM, Hublin J‐J, Boesch C. 2011. Metacarpal trabecular architecture variation in the chimpanzee ( Pan troglodytes ): evidence for locomotion and tool‐use? Am J Phys Anthropol 144: 215 – 225.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLesnik J. 2011a. Tools and termites: implications for the foraging behavior of the Swartkrans hominids. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLesnik J. 2011b. Bone tool texture analysis and the role of termites in the hominid diet. Paleoanthropology 2011: 268 – 281.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLesnik J. 2014. Termites in the hominin diet: a meta‐analysis of termite genera, species and castes as a dietary supplement for South African robust australopithecines. J Hum Evol 71: 94 – 104.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.