View Item 

Show simple item record

Statistical Measures for Usage‐Based Linguistics
dc.contributor.authorGries, Stefan Th.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEllis, Nick C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-01T18:51:49Z
dc.date.available2016-07-05T17:27:58Zen
dc.date.issued2015-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationGries, Stefan Th.; Ellis, Nick C. (2015). "Statistical Measures for Usage‐Based Linguistics." Language Learning 65(S1): 228-255.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0023-8333en_US
dc.identifier.issn1467-9922en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/111781
dc.publisherErlbaumen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.othersurprisalen_US
dc.subject.othercorpus dataen_US
dc.subject.otherpsycholinguisticsen_US
dc.subject.otherassociative learningen_US
dc.subject.otherfrequencyen_US
dc.subject.otherdispersionen_US
dc.subject.othercontingency/associationen_US
dc.titleStatistical Measures for Usage‐Based Linguisticsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelLinguisticsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/111781/1/lang12119.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/lang.12119en_US
dc.identifier.sourceLanguage Learningen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePartington, A. ( 2011 ). Phrasal irony: Its form, function, and exploitation. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1786 – 1800.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. ( 2013 ). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 329 – 347.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePierrehumbert, J. ( 2006 ). The next toolkit. Journal of phonetics, 34, 516 – 530.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRebuschat, P. (Ed.). (2015). Implicit and explicit learning of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRebuschat, P., & Williams, J. N. (Eds.). ( 2012 ). Statistical learning and language acquisition. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. ( 1972 ). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research (pp. 64 – 99 ). New York: Appleton‐Century‐Crofts.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). ( 2008 ). A handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoland, D., Dick, F., & Elman, J. L. ( 2007 ). Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: a corpus analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 348 – 379.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. ( 1986 ). Learning representations by back‐propagating errors. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 323 ( 6088 ), 533 – 536.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmidt, R. ( 1994 ). Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious: Of artificial grammars and SLA. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 165 – 210 ). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShanks, D. R. ( 1995 ). The psychology of associative learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlobin, D. I. ( 1997 ). The origins of grammaticizable notions: Beyond the individual mind. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 5, pp. 265 – 323 ). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, N. J., & Levy, R. ( 2013 ). The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic. Cognition, 128, 302 – 319.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. ( 2003 ). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8, 209 – 243.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStuddert‐Kennedy, M. ( 1991 ). Language development from an evolutionary perspective. In N. A. Krasnegor, D. M. Rumbaugh, R. L. Schiefelbusch, & M. Studdert‐Kennedy (Eds.), Biological and behavioral determinants of language development (pp. 5 – 28 ). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSuslov, I.M. ( 1992 ). Computer model of a “Sense of humour” II: Realization in neuronal networks. Biophysics, 37, 249 – 258.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTomasello, M. ( 2003 ). Constructing a language: A usage‐based theory of language acquisition. Boston: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrousdale, G., & Hoffmann, T. (Eds.). ( 2013 ). Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTversky, A. ( 1977 ). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327 – 352.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWills, A. J. ( 2009 ). Prediction errors and attention in the presence and absence of feedback. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 95 – 100.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWulff, S., Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. ( 2007 ). Brutal Brits and persuasive Americans: Variety‐specific meaning construction in the into‐causative. In G. Radden, K.‐M. Köpcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp. 265 – 281 ). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceXu, F., & Tennenbaum, J. ( 2007 ). Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review, 114, 245 – 272.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZipf, G. K. ( 1949 ). Human behaviour and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Cambridge, MA: Addison‐Wesley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, J. R. ( 1982 ). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369 – 406.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, J. R. ( 1989 ). A rational analysis of human memory. In H. L. I. Roediger & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 195 – 210 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, J. R. ( 2000 ). Cognitive psychology and its implications ( 5th ed. ). New York: W.H. Freeman.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaayen, R. H. ( 2008 ). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaayen, R. H. ( 2010 ). Demythologizing the word frequency effect: A discriminative learning perspective. The Mental Lexicon, 5, 436 – 461.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBartlett, F. C. ( 1932/1967 ). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBates, E., & MacWhinney, B. ( 1989 ). Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3 – 73 ). New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBird, S., Loper, E., & Klein, E. ( 2009 ). Natural language processing with Python. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.‐L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. ( 2008 ). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, P10008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBybee, J., & Hopper, P. (Eds.). ( 2001 ). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBybee, J., & Thompson, S. ( 2000 ). Three frequency effects in syntax. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 23, 65 – 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarey, S., & Bartlett, E. ( 1978 ). Acquiring a single new word. Proceedings of the Stanford Child Language Conference, 15, 17 – 29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChalmers, D. J. ( 1995 ). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2, 200 – 219.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark, A. ( 2013 ). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 181 – 204.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDanon, L., Díaz‐Guilera, A., Duch, J., & Arenas, A. ( 2005 ). Comparing community structure identification. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, P09008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDaudaravičius, V., & Marcinkevičienė, R. ( 2004 ). Gravity counts for the boundaries of collocations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9, 321 – 348.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. ( 2010 ). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDell, G. S., & Chang, F. ( 2014 ). The P‐chain: Relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B., 369, 20120394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0394.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDemberg, V., & Keller, F. ( 2008 ). Data from eye‐tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity. Cognition, 109, 193 – 210.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoğruöz, A. S., & Gries, S. Th. ( 2012 ). Spread of on‐going changes in an immigrant language: Turkish in the Netherlands. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 10, 401 – 426.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEbbinghaus, H. ( 1885 ). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussenius (1913), Trans.). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 1994 ). Vocabulary acquisition: The implicit ins and outs of explicit cognitive mediation. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 211 – 282 ). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2002 ). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143 – 188.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2003 ). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 33 – 68 ). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2005 ). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305 – 352.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2006 ). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 1 – 24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2007 ). Implicit and explicit knowledge about language. In J. Cenoz (Ed.), Knowledge about language (Vol. 6: Encyclopedia of Language and Education). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Scientific.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2008 ). Usage‐based and form‐focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned‐attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372 – 405 ). London: Routledge.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2012 ). Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 17 – 44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2015 ). Implicit AND explicit learning of language. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C., & Ferreira‐Junior, F. ( 2009 ). Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 187 – 220.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C., & O'Donnell, M. B. ( 2012 ). Statistical construction learning: Does a Zipfian problem space ensure robust language learning? In P. Rebuschat & J. Williams (Eds.), Statistical learning and language acquisition (pp. 265 – 304 ). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C., O'Donnell, M. B., & Römer, U. ( 2012 ). Usage‐based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition. Currents in Language Learning, 1, 25 – 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C., O'Donnell, M. B., & Römer, U. ( 2014 ). The processing of verb‐argument constructions is sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency, and prototypicality. Cognitive Linguistics, 25, 55 – 98.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C., & Schmidt, R. ( 1998 ). Rules or associations in the acquisition of morphology? The frequency by regularity interaction in human and PDP learning of morphosyntax. Language & Cognitive Processes, 13, 307 – 336.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElman, J. L. ( 1990 ). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179 – 211.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerrer i Cancho, R., & Solé, R. V. ( 2001 ). The small world of human language. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B., 268, 2261 – 2265.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerrer i Cancho, R., & Solé, R. V. ( 2003 ). Least effort and the origins of scaling in human language. PNAS, 100, 788 – 791.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrancis, G., Hunston, S., & Manning, E. (Eds.). ( 1996 ). Grammar patterns 1: Verbs. The COBUILD Series. London: HarperCollins.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreeman, L. ( 1977 ). A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness. Sociometry, 40, 35 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGirvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. ( 2002 ). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 99, 7821 – 7826.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, A. E. ( 2006 ). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N. ( 2004 ). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 289 – 316.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGries, S. Th. ( 2003 ). Testing the sub‐test: a collocational‐overlap analysis of English ‐ic and ‐ical adjectives. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8, 31 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGries, S. Th. ( 2008 ). Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13, 403 – 437.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGries, S. Th. ( 2009 ). Quantitative corpus linguistics with R: A practical introduction. London, New York: Routledge.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGries, S. Th. ( 2010 ). Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora: Further explorations. In S.Th. Gries, S. Wulff, & M. Davies (Eds.), Corpus linguistic applications: Current studies, new directions (pp. 197 – 212 ). Amsterdam: Rodopi.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGries, S. Th. ( 2013 ). 50‐something years of work on collocations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18, 137 – 165.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGries, S. Th., & Divjak, D. S. (Eds.). ( 2012 ). Frequency effects in cognitive linguistics (Vol. 1): Statistical effects in learnability, processing and change. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGries, S. Th., Hampe, B., & Schönefeld, D. ( 2005 ). Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 16, 635 – 676.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGries, S. Th., Hampe, B., & Schönefeld, D. ( 2010 ). Converging evidence II: More on the association of verbs and constructions. In S. Rice & J. Newman (Eds.), Empirical and experimental methods in cognitive/functional research (pp. 59 – 72 ). Stanford, CA: CSLI.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGries, S. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A. ( 2004 ). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus‐based perspective on “alternations.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9, 97 – 129.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGries, S. Th., & Wulff, S. ( 2009 ). Psycholinguistic and corpus linguistic evidence for L2 constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 163 – 186.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHale, J. T. ( 2011 ). What a rational parser would do. Cognitive Science, 35, 399 – 443.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHanks, P. ( 2009 ). The linguistic double helix: Norms and exploitations. In Hlaváčková, D., Horák, A. Osolsobě, K. & Rychlý, P. (Eds.), After half a century of Slavonic Natural Language Processing (Festschrift for Karel Pala) (pp. 63 – 80 ). Brno, Czech Republic: Masaryk University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHanks, P. ( 2013 ). Lexical analysis: Norms and exploitations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. E. ( 2008 ). Implicit learning and syntactic persistence: Surprisal and cumulativity. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society Conference (pp. 1061 – 1066 ). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. E. ( 2013 ). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime's prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127, 57 – 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKilgarriff, A., Rychly, P., Smrz, P., & Tugwel, D. ( 2004 ). The sketch engine. Proc EURALEX 2004, Lorient, France., 105 – 116.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKolb, P. ( 2008 ). DISCO: A multilingual database of distributionally similar words. In Proceedings of KONVENS‐2008, Berlin, Germany.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacDonald, M. C., & Seidenberg, M. S. ( 2006 ). Constraint satisfaction accounts of lexical and sentence comprehension. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics ( 2nd ed., pp. 581 – 611 ). London: Elsevier.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacWhinney, B. ( 1987 ). Applying the competition model to bilingualism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 315 – 327.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacWhinney, B. ( 1997 ). Second language acquisition and the competition model. In A. M. B. De Groot & J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 113 – 142 ). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacWhinney, B. ( 2001 ). The competition model: The input, the context, and the brain. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 69 – 90 ). New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMichelbacher, L., Evert, S., & Schütze, H. ( 2011 ). Asymmetry in corpus‐derived and human word associations. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5, 79 – 103.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, G. A. ( 2009 ). WordNet–About us. Retrieved March 1, 2010, from http://wordnet.princeton.edu.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoon, C., Lagercrantz, H., & Kuhl, P. K. ( 2012 ). Language experienced in utero affects vowel perception after birth: A two‐country study. Acta Paediatrica, 102, 156 – 160.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewell, A. ( 1990 ). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman, M. E. J. ( 2010 ). Networks: An introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Donnell, M. B., Ellis, N. C., Corden, G., Considine, L., & Römer, U. ( 2015 ). Using network science algorithms to explore the semantics of verb argument constructions in language usage, processing, and acquisition. Manuscript submitted for publication.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePecina, P. ( 2009 ). Lexical association measures and collocation extraction. Language Resources and Evaluation, 44, 137 – 158.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePedersen, T., Patwardhan, S., & Michelizzi, J. ( 2004 ). WordNet::Similarity–Measuring the relatedness of concepts. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Fifth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics (NAACL 2004).en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
lang12119.pdf
Size:
621.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.