Show simple item record

Counting Cadres: A Comparative View of the Size of China’s Public Employment

dc.contributor.authorAng, Yuen Yuen
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-05T00:48:02Z
dc.date.available2015-06-05T00:48:02Z
dc.date.issued2012-09-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/111822
dc.description.abstractIs China’s public bureaucracy overstaffed? To answer this basic question objectively, one needs to define public employment in the contemporary Chinese context; survey data sources available to measure public employment; and finally, compare China’s public employment size with that of other countries. Using a variety of new sources, this article performs all three tasks. It also goes further to clarify the variance between bianzhi (formally established posts) and actual staffing size, as well as other permutations of the bianzhi system, especially chaobian (exceeding the bianzhi). A key finding is that China’s net public employment per capita is not as large as often perceived; quite the contrary, it is one-third below the international mean. However, it is clear that the actual number of employees in the party-state bureaucracy has grown – and is still growing – steadily since reforms, despite repeated downsizing campaigns. Such expansion has been heavily concentrated at the sub-provincial levels and among shiye danwei (extra-bureaucracies).en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe China Quarterlyen_US
dc.subjectsize of government; bureaucracy; public employment; overstaffing; bianzhi; state capacity; Chinese state statisticsen_US
dc.titleCounting Cadres: A Comparative View of the Size of China’s Public Employmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPolitical Science
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Political Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/111822/1/Ang, Counting cadres.pdf
dc.identifier.sourceThe China Quarterlyen_US
dc.owningcollnamePolitical Science


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.